You are required to recommend 2-3 reviewers at submission. I received a notice for major revision after one month, and I was given one month. There were 2 reviewers who recommended publication after grammatical problems are fixed, but the other reviewer raised several questions that were not easy to address. I asked for an extension of one week, and carefully answered each question. I submitted the revised manuscript in the morning, and when I checked the status at night, It was already "Accept." The editor must have accepted the paper without sending the revised manuscript to the reviewers. It took 2 months from submission to acceptance. I think this is quite fast.

(2) Thank | 笑笑

has been delisted by SCI, everyone must be cautious

(6) Thank | Anonymous

The speed is very slow after repairing

(0) Thank | xmyy

No news for half a year, retraction

(2) Thank | cici

It seems that Springer has been with the journal.

(1) Thank | haha

editor assigned for two weeks has not arranged for reviewer

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2.518 Hit rate about 18%

(0) Thank | Anonymous

dragged me for nearly half a year before giving the message, and finally refused to draft

(0) Thank | Wang Panna

4-5 people are recommended for submissionThe reviewer submitted a notice of overhaul for one month and gave it a month. Two reviewers commented that the grammar problem could be published after revision. The other two reviewers had several questions and felt bad answers.The time limit application extended the modification time of one week, answered each question seriously, submitted the revised draft in the morning, and checked the status at night. “Accept” may be directly accepted by the editor, and the revised draft was not sent to the reviewer.It took 2 months and 12 days from submission to acceptance.Still relatively fast.

(0) Thank | Anonymous