Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | TUMOR BIOLOGY (According to the latest JCR data, this journal is not indexed in the JCR.) | ||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | TUMOR BIOL | ||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 1010-4283 | ||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1423-0380 | ||||||||||||||||
h-index | 70 | ||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | N/A | ||||||||||||||||
Official Website | https://www.springer.com/journal/13277 | ||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://www.editorialmanager.com/TUBI | ||||||||||||||||
Open Access | Yes (Hybrid OA journal) | ||||||||||||||||
Publisher | SPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS, 3311 GZ | ||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Medicine | ||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | SWITZERLAND | ||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Bimonthly | ||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 2010 | ||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 1625 | ||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | |||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1010-4283%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 1.0 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: About 27.5% | ||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on TUMOR BIOLOGY: | Write a review |
Author: 笑笑 Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-03-15 23:45:59 You are required to recommend 2-3 reviewers at submission. I received a notice for major revision after one month, and I was given one month. There were 2 reviewers who recommended publication after grammatical problems are fixed, but the other reviewer raised several questions that were not easy to address. I asked for an extension of one week, and carefully answered each question. I submitted the revised manuscript in the morning, and when I checked the status at night, It was already "Accept." The editor must have accepted the paper without sending the revised manuscript to the reviewers. It took 2 months from submission to acceptance. I think this is quite fast. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-07-18 18:38:43 has been delisted by SCI, everyone must be cautious ![]() ![]() |
Author: xmyy Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2017-01-20 10:03:11 The speed is very slow after repairing ![]() ![]() |
Author: cici Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-11-28 16:30:10 No news for half a year, retraction ![]() ![]() |
Author: haha Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted directly Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-10-28 10:48:19 It seems that Springer has been with the journal. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-07-26 16:01:38 editor assigned for two weeks has not arranged for reviewer ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-10-23 11:39:00 2.518 Hit rate about 18% ![]() ![]() |
Author: Wang Panna Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-08-13 18:37:26 dragged me for nearly half a year before giving the message, and finally refused to draft ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-01-28 17:57:00 4-5 people are recommended for submissionThe reviewer submitted a notice of overhaul for one month and gave it a month. Two reviewers commented that the grammar problem could be published after revision. The other two reviewers had several questions and felt bad answers.The time limit application extended the modification time of one week, answered each question seriously, submitted the revised draft in the morning, and checked the status at night. “Accept” may be directly accepted by the editor, and the revised draft was not sent to the reviewer.It took 2 months and 12 days from submission to acceptance.Still relatively fast. ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page |