My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Professional Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY]Hello, you are Visitor Number 110235 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleAPPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
Journal Title AbbreviationsAPPL MICROBIOL BIOT
ISSN0175-7598
E-ISSN1432-0614
h-index198
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
3.921.1271.236
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Immunology and Microbiology
Subcategory: Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Q117 / 98
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: Biotechnology
Q151 / 257

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)8.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.springer.com/chemistry/biotechnology/journal/253
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.editorialmanager.com/amab/
Open AccessNo
PublisherSPRINGER, 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10013
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationGERMANY
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1984
Annual Article Volume849
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0175-7598%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 2.0 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 50%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY: Write a review
Author: zhanyulian@hotmail.com


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-03-12 01:43:54
I submitted to AMB on January 18. The reviewers were all recommended by the editor (I did not list any recommended reviewers myself). I received reviews extremely quickly – by January 29 – from all reviewers. Most of the reviews were positive! I revised my paper according to the reviewer’s comments and it was accepted on Feb 6. The review speed is great – far beyond my expectations. Once my paper was accepted, I was told that the proof would take 3-4 weeks. I highly recommend this journal.

(2) Thank | zhanyulian@hotmail.com

Author: 猪猪读博士


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-02 23:10:43
The first SCI, the AMB, the reviewer is very nice, the editor is very responsible, in short, it feels good!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 猪猪读博士

Author: 超级小学渣


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-14 20:04:17
The draft of No. 31, No. 11.7 was submitted for review. Until now, there was no news on January 14, 2019. It was almost two and a half months. What is the situation? Now this journalIs it so slow?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 超级小学渣

Author: DundeeKang


Subject Area: ????????
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-06 00:43:56
How can I keep commenting??The first time to send EST, unreviewed directly refused, and changed to AEM, reviewer, small Japanese editor Hideaki Nojiri declined. tampering with AMB 9.13 contribution 10.8 minor repair 10.23 repaired 10.27 received.The speed of review is fast. I feel a little water.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | DundeeKang

Author: DundeeKang


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-11-06 00:38:17
投ES
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | DundeeKang

Author: DundeeKang


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-10-31 02:35:13
Before submiting ES
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | DundeeKang

Author: Jingxia_Mei@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-26 09:47:31
5.4 submitted to the journal;5.4 sent back to author Change the format, results and discussion need to be divided into two parts, no conclusions;5.6 Submission5.8 with editor5.18 under review6.12 major revision Overhaul, both reviewers agree that the content is interested, each person submits five comments, and needs to complete four application experiments (most have been done), the data needs statistical analysis;6.27revised manuscript submitted No summary drawing is required, and no more than 10 charts are required in the text, and the extra data is placed in the supplementary file.6.28 with editor7.3 under review7.25 accept This time is quite long, only one reviewer replied.After two and a half months, it was not easy, and I was very fortunate. The first time I wrote an article, I was in the first place.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Jingxia_Mei@163.com

Author: 707145297@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-11 16:39:52
The reviewer is very responsible and the review is coming to an end.Overhaul once, minor repairs, it is directly acceptd.Ha ha..Let's share it!725554986
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 707145297@qq.com

Author: 12549277@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-30 22:09:52
2018.2.1 Submitted
         2.2 submitted QC
         2.5 with editor
         2.11 under review
      
         4.7 minor revision
         4.26 revised manuscript submitted
         4.28 decision in process
         4.29 accept
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 12549277@qq.com

Author: Spillar


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-07 23:40:27
2017.12.6 submitted to journal;12.7 with editor;12.19 under review;2017.1.20 major revision;2.15 submitted to journal;2.17 major revision;2.24 submitted to journal;2.26 with editor;3.4 minor revision;3.6 accept.CEJ, STOEN, and Chemosphere have been rejected by the editors, and they have been transferred to AMB, two reviewers, and 33 opinions in the first instance. One of them is a tutor of foreign cooperation, and 18 editors have revised opinions. The amendments are detailed in detail.The draft speed is amazing, the format requirements are strict, and every comment of the reviewer should be taken care of. The individual feels that the article is not very innovative.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Spillar

Author: houningkewanderful@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-06 15:54:54
Yours is also contributing a month, what dynamics are there?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | houningkewanderful@163.com

Author: houningkewanderful@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-04 17:22:50
I also submitted a manuscript for a month, and I am still in the editor's hands.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | houningkewanderful@163.com

Author: keyan008


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-03 21:44:19
with editor A month soon, what stuff
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | keyan008

Author: 妮蔚莲


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-12-04 19:10:29
2016.5.2 Submission2016.5.13 Edit Rejection
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 妮蔚莲

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-04-07 09:07:57
Give everyone my contribution history for reference.8.4 submission;8.7 requires uploading sequence, deadline for one month;9.10 In the middle of the delay, write a letter to the editor, request extension of time;9.11 The Chief Editor replied and agreed to give it two weeks;9.27 submit the sequence;10.3 submitted to journal;10.10 under review;10.30-1.15 Requires reviewers for review, recommended 3 times before and after, 7 or so each time, all require Europe and America;2.7 overhaul, deadline 3.17;3.14 write to the editor in chief, requesting a delay in the deadline;3.15 No reply, urgent!3.16 The Chief Editor agrees to give two weeks of worship;3.31 submit revision;4.5 Accept.In general, I feel that the editor of AMB is a lot more nice than several other journals, but this article is really entangled, the twists and turns
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: wu


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-02-27 15:04:24
2月4日稿On February 7th, minor repairs will upload the sequencing data.February 10 upload sequenceFebruary 12 with editorFebruary 15 under reviewOn February 27th, the editor wrote a letter saying that no reviewers could be found (I chose the authors of the past one or two years)Has been under reviewIt doesn't look too fast..急啊
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | wu

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-26 15:27:00
The first AMB is still easy this year's IF: 3.425, soared tooFast, it is estimated that it is more difficult to contribute later.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-20 16:48:00
Reviewing speed is fast!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-02-27 15:02:00
This is the third AMB of the ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Very fast ~ haha ​​~
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-31 19:08:00
The speed is very fast, I thought it was quite promising, but it was indeed a reviewer who was a little amateur, negatingThe application value of my article.In fact, he really does not understand my business. If you really do this, you must know that the result I got is already good.But forget it, I don't want to make any complaints. Now I am going to switch to another journal, but I still thank the editors. The speed is really fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-19 09:09:00
The estimated period for reviewers is one month, so under review for more than one month + one week can be drafted.This is my reminder letter: AMAB-D-12-****** / Re: Enquiry of review process
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-08 20:22:00
I would like to ask, my article is received on April 24th.Why are you now in October and have not been published yet?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-28 10:43:00
2 At the end of the month, the manuscript was very depressed, and it was a waste of a month.In May, return to the review comments.The opinions of the two reviewers were good, and the other one was amateur, and the result was rejected.However, the editor gave the opportunity to re-attend.On August 22, the data was added and the reviewer's RESPONSE was re-submited, and the repair was given 20 days later.Received after two days of minor repairs.This journal has a relatively high format requirement for the article (after all, it is a German journal), the results and discussion must be written separately, and there must be no independent conclusion. Also, we should try not to find China when we are looking for reviewers (including Taiwan).), and must have a few European and American.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-22 14:26:00
7.6Submission, 7.13 Under review, 7.25 status change is still Under review.No. 9.21 results.2 reviewers: one raised a lot of comments, details.Another objection directly to the paper research content, that the experimental part of the data is incomplete and needs to be supplemented.After editing the comprehensive opinions, they are directly involved.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-20 14:47:00
6 At the end of the month, the editor directly called back, saying that the wild strain must provide the number of the public deposit. After the revision, it was re-submited in early July. With the editor, it will be under review for almost 10 days, one month later.At the end of the manuscript, it took another week to return to the comments. The two reviewers had a harsh opinion, lacked new ideas, and the experimental part was not complete. One was not very picky. The editor decided to reject the draft, but allowed the supplementary experiment to be greatly revised.hard pitch.I feel that AMB is currently submiting too many people. The results of the review that may have been overhauled in the past are now rejected directly by the editor. I just don't object to your re-entry, and the shelves are getting bigger and bigger...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY AND BIOTECHNOLOGY]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag


Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*

© 2010-2020 United States: ACCDON LLC Tel: 1-781-202-9968 Email: info@accdon.com
Address: 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
LetPub Privacy Policy