Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

PLoS One

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[PLoS One]Hello, you are Visitor Number 444248 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitlePLoS One
Journal Title AbbreviationsPLOS ONE
ISSN1932-6203
h-index241
CiteScore
CiteScoreQuartiles within subject categoriesCiteScore Rank
3.01Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Medicine (miscellaneous) (Q1)

Subject fieldRankPercentile
Category: Agricultural and Biological Sciences
Subcategory: General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
16 / 177
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
42 / 186

Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)6.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.plosone.org/home.action
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/default.asp
Open AccessYes
PublisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 185 BERRY ST, STE 1300, SAN FRANCISCO, USA, CA, 94107
Subject AreaBiology
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyIrregular
Year Publication Started2006
Annual Article Volume20328
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1932-6203%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 2.6 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 88%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【PLoS One】Impact Indicator Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Indicator Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)
  Reviews on PLoS One: Write a review
Author: luckyzcx


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-02-19 16:06:00
has been overhauled for more than a month, then minor repairs, from posting to publication for 140 days. The editor is very responsible and quite professional.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | luckyzcx

Author: meng


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-12-04 03:16:54
remember where I saw the comment about plos one before, saying that there is an article in my life,It’s stinking when you selectd more, and you agree!!
Show Review in Original Language
(9) Thank | meng

Author: cykk


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-28 10:59:22
There may be less than 3 points next year
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | cykk

Author: 627395814@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-10-27 09:03:14
has been submitted for more than one month, or under review
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 627395814@qq.com

Author: wxd123


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-10-26 14:49:30
selectd for more than 1 month, or uner review
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | wxd123

Author: bigantbrl@hotmail.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-16 09:52:24
Overall, it was still very smooth, submitted on June 17th, and the reviewer returned to the major revision evaluation on July 16th. There are some good suggestions, and the change will be completed on August 5th.Voted, the 10th was received.From the trial to the formal acceptance of the entire process for nearly 2 months.Although the Chinese people are confused about their journals, they believe that the so-called good journals also have low-value articles. As a strictly prohibited researcher, you should not wear colored glasses on journals. Every article should be the best for yourself.The degree, if it is worth to publish, the results that are unbelievable and the experiments that cannot be repeated are sent to journals that no one is watching. It is also shameful for science.Therefore, it is not necessary to entangle this. This is a water publication, and it is only a matter of one or two years.
Show Review in Original Language
(21) Thank | bigantbrl@hotmail.com

Author: gtt


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-07-28 13:37:22
Ready to select for this, who told me how much the next page fee?
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | gtt

Author: pppaaa


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-03-07 11:08:35
is indeed water journal, good mix
Show Review in Original Language
(62) Thank | pppaaa

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-02-18 21:20:08
said that after the water journal selectd for it, it was only after 3 months of review that the reviewer encountered 2 big peers and 1 small peer opinion gave 46 big repairs 2 times but the journalsThe processing speed is really not very fast. It is not like other journals who have returned to the editors for a half-month to return to the reviewers. There is no news. However, the amount of documents is so large that it is stable to the 3rd district.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: ADU


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-02-04 16:42:19
Long time, the journal's tolerance is strong, there are scruples when submiting, but after all, it's fast.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | ADU

Author: 358816637@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-01-13 09:14:35
selectd rejected, modified Plos one, first trial for more than one month, two reviewers, edited toOverhaul, more opinions, wrote more than 20 pages, after uploading with the editor more than 20 days directly accepted.I feel that after the revision in 2015, from the format to the review, the whole is strict, the reviewers are very professional, the opinions are in place, and the article is improved a lot. I hope that IF will rise steadily!
Show Review in Original Language
(17) Thank | 358816637@qq.com

Author: 435966483@qq.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-12-15 21:40:23
has already submitted two articles, one is almost two months, let's wait for the news; the other is also editor invited for a month..Anxiety
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 435966483@qq.com

Author: huwg09@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-11-28 13:52:25
The first submission on August 22nd, the technical review has not passed, the upload was uploaded again on the 25th, and the review was completed one week later. On October 9th, the first review opinion was obtained, and two reviewers,The opinions were positive and negative, but the editor seemed to prefer a reviewer who had a positive opinion. He gave a major repair, 45 days, and after the revision, he selectd on November 15th. At present, there is 13 days with the editor. I don’t know what the rhythm is.~~ Anxious~~ Pray for good luck!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | huwg09@163.com

Author: xiaomu


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-11-18 23:06:47
PLOS ONE This journal is very good. Although it is slow, it is still accepted. The editors and judges are very sincere and very rigorous. Thanks to PLOS ONE for achieving so many people, so those who are disgusting.The journal is dead!In addition, I personally think that those who are black journals must be refused, or see many people who selectd for this journal are very successful, personal opinions,!
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | xiaomu

Author: wyuwpp@126.com


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-09-05 05:41:13
15Submission on July 19th, with editor and under review within one week.It took nearly a month to review the manuscript, and on August 15th received the review comments, two reviewers, one of which recommended a theoretical experiment to verify, overhaul opinions; another reviewer Xiao Xiu received, mainly for certain issuesMade a simple explanation.It took a few days to replenish the experiment and repair the manuscript. It was repaired on August 31. On the same day, it was with editor. After three days, it directly became decision in process. On the fourth day, it was received directly, less than two months before and after.The editing efficiency is quite high, and the reviewer's opinions are also very pertinent. The opinions put forward are very entangled at the beginning, but after the completion of the supplement, I feel that the quality of the article is much improved, more systematic and more comprehensive.
Show Review in Original Language
(14) Thank | wyuwpp@126.com

Author: Felix888


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-08-06 12:30:49
PLOS ONE This junk journal is not generally slow. It has been submitted for 2 months. The editor still didn't submit the review. When I got fired, I sent it out.
Show Review in Original Language
(11) Thank | Felix888

Author: science


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-07-30 11:35:58
The impact factor has dropped for several years and may rise next year
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | science

Author: 110


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-11-24 08:56:07
Very fast, 2 months to give advice, repaired for one month, modified after receiving, half-month online publication.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 110

Author: 查理


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-11-23 12:36:39
The journal editor is very professional, careful. The response speed is fast. And the layout fee can be reduced.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 查理

Author: YY


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-11-10 15:42:29
The article has been submitted, and the submission will be submitted in May, from May to 10During the month, I have been "editor invited". I have received several letters saying that I have not found a suitable editor. I can choose to retract. I still choose to continue waiting for the result. At the end of October, I finally became an under review.Review, look forward to a good result!The first sci in
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | YY

Author: plant


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-10-18 16:57:04
this journal is more controversial, butOverall, PLOS ONE also has more good articles published.Our group recently published an article.The second revision requires a change in the language, and the American experts at LetPub have helped us a lot.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | plant

Author: kucaicai


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-10-03 10:10:42
recording speed is very fast, repaired twice
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | kucaicai

Author: xiao


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-09-06 06:32:21
Since the purpose of PLOS one is different from other journals, the importance of the paper is no longer evaluated before publication, but is accepted by peers after publication, providing an opportunity for extensive exchanges..Then, there may be some articles with low academic value in the journal.Therefore, the Chinese do not want to use PLOS one to brag about how high the impact factor of their articles is, which is contrary to the purpose of the journal.There are still some good articles on it, but the layout fee is too high, which is difficult for general scholars to bear.
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | xiao

Author: zhaoqm123


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-03-24 18:43:44
Reviewing speed is faster.But it is said that it is getting slower and slower now, and there may be too many manuscripts.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | zhaoqm123

Author: zhni2013


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-12-11 16:28:44
This journal has always been good, it is a bit expensive to pay money
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | zhni2013

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    7    Next    Last  (To Page
/7)

Start your review of [PLoS One]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.