X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

Nanoscale Research Letters

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[Nanoscale Research Letters]Hello, you are Visitor Number 212245 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleNanoscale Research Letters
Journal Title AbbreviationsNANOSCALE RES LETT
ISSN1931-7573
E-ISSN1556-276X
h-index81
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
7.700.8701.143
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Condensed Matter Physics
Q140 / 411
Category: Physics and Astronomy
Subcategory: Materials Science (all)
Q171 / 455

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)3.80%
Official Websitehttps://www.springer.com/journal/11671
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/NARL
Open AccessYes
PublisherSPRINGER, 233 SPRING ST, NEW YORK , USA, NY, 10013
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started2006
Annual Article Volume388
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1931-7573%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher: 48 days, to first decision for reviewed manuscripts only
30 days, to first decision for all manu
Data from Authors: About 2.7 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Easy
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Nanoscale Research Letters】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on Nanoscale Research Letters: Write a review
Author: 饼师


Subject Area: Physics
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-04-28 21:34:19
Received review comments at the end of March. All three reviewers suggested minor revisions. We took two weeks to supplement experiments, analyze data, and complete the response letter. All three reviewers gave comments for acceptance yesterday, and we got the letter of acceptance. Thank you!

(5) Thank | 饼师

Author: SCITOP


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-04-28 08:42:42

(2) Thank | SCITOP

Author: 彩虹


Subject Area: Environmental Sciences
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-03-31 10:04:39
It was submitted on February 20. It was under review on February 27. Reviewers completed it on March 13. Reviewers were assigned on March 30. Do you mean the third reviewer was assigned as the two reviewers have different opinions? How are you on the 11th floor?

(0) Thank | 彩虹

Author: llyaomo@163.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-26 12:39:24
Our paper is on crystal silicon solar battery. After submission the manuscript was sent to peer review within 3 days. The result of the first- review came back in half a month. Four reviewers. I revised the paper and resubmitted.  The paper was accepted three weeks later. Not counting the month I was on vacation, this article was accepted in one month, which is quite good. If you need a paper soon, you can try this journal. The efficiency is high when publication is not free.

(0) Thank | llyaomo@163.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-22 17:10:00
It took only a month from submission to acceptance. The review was fast but also serious. The reviewers provided very helpful feedback. My many grammar and vocabulary problems had to be modified. And some content had to be modified. For example, if you add experimental equipment, you will be able to list the changes in the revised draft.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 皮皮同学


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-19 10:23:01
has been submitted for 10 days, and is still inviting reviewers, and it feels very slow.Is there any news on the 12th floor article?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 皮皮同学

Author: 博士僧


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-07 19:16:16
More than two months, or under review, I have recently selectd in this journal
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 博士僧

Author: SCITOP


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-10 17:14:02
selectd for nearly a month, has been the Reviewers Assigned state, the middle time has changed twice
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | SCITOP

Author: mazzyeagle


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-09-25 11:23:03
2 05 Submission3 10 2 are given to minor repairs3.25 Modifying the return5.28 1 reviewer disappeared, and there was no reply~~ Editor-in-Chief invited 2 reviewers~~1 to accept 1 overhaul (this overhaul is obviously a layman)6.15 Revised and returned, politely introduced the relevant theories in this field6.24 Reviewer of overhaul to minor repair7.12 minor repair return8.10 AcceptThere are fast and slow, look at luck.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | mazzyeagle

Author: 还可以


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-05 21:14:27
first English article, first half month, 10 days after minor repairRecruitment, the middle of the reply to the comments delayed for a month, the review speed is very fast.The only insufficient page fee is too high: $1,450.The article focuses on the ion exchange of inorganic perovskites.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 还可以

Author: hahaxiao


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-21 17:07:14
Generally, there is news in the first instance in one month. Now even if the impact factor has reached 2.8, it will be officially expected to break through 3 in June!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | hahaxiao

Author: 第一帅


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-12 15:47:51
The second article was rejected.Two reviewers, one refused, one gave some comments, and finally refused
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 第一帅

Author: 1064664751@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-17 10:57:23
is very fast, the editor is responsible.NARL is SCIE?Is it SCI?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 1064664751@qq.com

Author: yiukk


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-01 14:12:09
review is still very fast, selectd out on October 30, returned to minor repairs at the end of November, received on December 1st, need a layout fee of 940 pounds, I heard thatIt is necessary to drop from Zone 2 to Zone 3, but after reading the new partition in November, it still writes Zone 2.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | yiukk

Author: 3321


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-28 18:42:05
money-saving tools, a teacher editor of the school, huh, huh!
Show Review in Original Language
(20) Thank | 3321

Author: zzsad


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-14 10:37:29
journal is still very fast, and the layout fee is required. After two weeks after the submitment, it is under review. The two reviewers are still very responsible and gave many review comments.And two months of overhaul time, saying that my reply review comments are enough for an article...After the change is accepted, the influence factor will continue to rise
Show Review in Original Language
(19) Thank | zzsad

Author: zhffriend


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-12-24 11:34:06
9Submission No. 5,Major revision on September 27, and revised draft on November 7th.November 7th, second trial, minor repair, submitted out four days laterAccepted on November 15th.Very fast, two reviewers.
Show Review in Original Language
(14) Thank | zhffriend

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-28 01:08:00
Magazine review is quite fast, Received: 7 January 2013Accepted: 14 February 2013Published: 2 March 2013 is the back page fee is too expensive, or hit the pound, must go to the big bank foreign exchange
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-13 11:31:00
Please select for Nanoscale Research Letters review status changed to Editorial decision making, how is it
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-23 10:07:00
modified 2 times acceptance, it is easier.The layout fee is too expensive, £750. It is recommended to pay by credit card.It seems that the relevant institutions of the Chinese Academy of Sciences will be cheaper to contribute.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-09-07 12:34:00
Feel that this journal is not kind, has selectd two, and the situation is exactly the same: after submitting the manuscript for more than a month, he received the rejection letter from the editor, and there is no external audit at all.If your editor thinks that the manuscript level is low within 1-2 weeks, it is completely acceptable to withdraw the manuscript. It will take a long time to make a draft. How long does it take for the editor to review the first trial for more than a month?However, fortunately, two pieces of rejected ones have been published, and one has been selectd for a journal of more than 2 points. At present, the review comments have been returned, minor repairs.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-09-07 11:02:00
How can this journal submission go to the contact details section every time, and then go down and go on?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-21 10:41:00
Journal Homepage URL: http://www.springer.com/materials/nanotechnology/journal/11671
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-08 10:57:00
Have studied this journal carefully.It is a journal belonging to SCI-E.SCI-E is often classified within the scope of SCI in China, and the real SCI-E is actually a network version of SCI.In other words, if the SCI is not good, it may be classified into SCI-E. If SCI-E is good, it may rise to SCI.The last article, from submission, revision, to acceptance, was shared for 2 months.Feeling efficiency is OK, there are 2 reviewers, the problem is not difficult to answer, but more.There is also a high charge after acceptance.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-07-08 14:19:00
The review speed is very slow, and the editing is very draggy.Finally, the reviewers were found to be uneven, and some comments were very layman!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [Nanoscale Research Letters]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service