JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY

Thank you for your experience. The editors are still very good. 6 months after submission, I was anxious and sent an email reminder, and then they quickly gave review comments and required major revisions. It was then accepted one month after the revision. The reviewers were relatively professional and gave valuable comments. The following is the process of the paper, for your reference only. 17-12-2019 Initial date submitted; 19-12-2019 With editor; 08-02-2020 Under Review; 26-05-2020 Major revision; 12-07-2020 Revised, with editor; 04-08-2020 Accepted.

(2) Thank | 老5

2019.7.25 Submit; 2019.08.25 Under Review. Two reminders. 2020.06.05 Minor revision. 2020.06.13 Submit revised manuscript. A reminder. 2020.07.14 Accept. It’s really too long, too long. You must remember to remind the manuscript. Reminding manuscripts is too important.

(2) Thank | POMEKWD

2019.12.28, submission; 2019.12.31, with editor; 2020.02.10, under review; 2020.04.18, major revision; 2020.05.06, submitted revised manuscript; 2020.06.19, accept. The editor was nice, who gave many good suggestions. The comments raised by the reviewers were pertinent, professional and constructive, and they should be the peer. During the period, it was Christmas and Chinese New Year; the whole process took a bit long time. In addition, it was affected by the COVID-19, it took half a year. I hope that domestic and foreign colleagues will be healthy and safe during pandemic!

(2) Thank | 逍遥和尚

This journal is very responsible, and will not deliberately ask for a major change in the language of the publication of the Aswell Publishing House. The overall feeling is that the editor is very good, and it is inconvenient to repeatedly modify the details until acceptance. I have already sent two articles and I feel that the editor is very good. As for the IF, it is only 1.75, which is not high. It will rise very quickly, but it is a journal with similar influence as TCA and IECR.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The 36th floor is good. How long does it take to receive review comments after the required reviews are completed?

(0) Thank | bluefire

One of the articles, up to now 10 months, still under review, do not want to select, send an email to find the editor, sent yesterday, has not responded.I don't know if I haven't heard back for so long. What happened? I refused a manuscript. Can't I even bother to refuse?Don't like it, don't let others go, do it?Hey...

(4) Thank | 不追了

Required Reviews Completed The review of the first review ended half a month. Why not give comments or reject the draft?Is it generally a review of this journal directly?Is there a state in the middle?

(3) Thank | wuyun123

20180207 contribution;20180731 overhaul;20180810 Heavy shot after overhaul;20180818 receiving;20180822 Proof of the school.

(0) Thank | Kylin

Very fast

(0) Thank | 月下柳儿笑

rejected after one and a half months of submission, the review speed is very fast, and it is more professional for thermal analysis technology.

(0) Thank | 樱吹雪

17 in October, and submitted to under review at the end of October. I am still under review, and the review is slow.

(3) Thank | 496245417@qq.com

The second article, the first one took some detours and finally accepted.The second article 2017-12-14submit 2018-01-01 under review, now in March, the review comments have not yet returned.Looking forward to the last post of Bo's career.

(1) Thank | Rivers0407

2017.11.20 Submission2018.1.20 Review comments2018.2.12 Submit revised draft2018.2.25 Receive

(4) Thank | 1203241504@qq.com

2017.12.052017.12.17 or With editor

(2) Thank | gvohq

submitted for two weeks, or with editor.Like fast journal

(1) Thank | 基材

2017-3-14 submitted2017-3-25 under review2017-5-20 under review

(0) Thank | zhu04401539@163.com

14-03-2017 25-03-2017 Under Review

(0) Thank | zhu04401539@163.com

From the submission to the recruitment for 5 months, repaired in the middle...

(0) Thank | lixivip89@163.com

4.1 submission;5.22 The editor refused to submit the manuscript, but the reason for rejecting the manuscript was wrong.5.30 re-submitment;6.16 under review;Currently there is no feedback on August 11..Oh, don't mention it..

(0) Thank | 大漠沙如雪

It’s almost two months, or with the editor, what’s the matter?

(12) Thank | 15815634@qq.com

ArticleThe emphasis is on the thermodynamic analysis of the mixed combustion direction. It has been submitted for more than a month. It has been with the editor state. Should I remind me??,

(2) Thank | 1143297659@qq.com

The first article of the journal was very good. The reviewers and editors were very strong, giving a very positive evaluation, a minor repair, and a direct reception.Later, I selectd for an article with the editor for more than 20 days. I hope that the editor will give it a little. This journal is still very good.

(0) Thank | h670598410@163.com

I can't find a reviewer at first, and the recommended reviewer is not willing to give a review, so I dragged it for nearly a year, and the article was written.It’s still a bit of a long time.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Editing is very good. After the modification, the notice will be given within two weeks. The efficiency of the work is relatively high. If the reviewer reviews the draft faster, the overall review cycle will beGreatly shortened.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

The review speed is OK, the review is completed, and it is ten days in the editor.

(0) Thank | 009