Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | J BIOTECHNOL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 0168-1656 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1873-4863 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 140 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020) | 2.60% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/505515/description | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://www.editorialmanager.com/JBIOTEC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Engineering | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | NETHERLANDS | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Semimonthly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1984 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 220 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0168-1656%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 4.2 month(s) Data from Elsevier: Average 5.2 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: About 35% Data from Elsevier: 23% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Article Publication Time | Data from Elsevier: Average 4.1 Week(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY: | Write a review |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-02-15 08:55:00 One month review. The executive deputy editor is very strong. Two reviewers. As long as there is a well-founded response to the review comments, the possibility of acceptance is high. ![]() ![]() |
Author: annerpapa Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-09-20 15:51:54 Submitted for three days, I was told that I have not received the articles of the genome announcement.2018.09.20 ![]() ![]() |
Author: huiyongzhang115@163.com Subject Area: Medical Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2018-08-11 03:43:43 Submitted for 2 months, overhauled, revised for 2 months, then submitted 1Month, minor repair, minor repair submitted for 1 week, accepted the next day. ![]() ![]() |
Author: gscao@henu.edu.cn Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-09-23 01:26:17 language requirements are very high!Language requirements are high!Language requirements are high!Because it is very important, say 3 timesThe editor is very good and pays attention to detail.It will take more than three months from the first article to the revised one.Minor repairs are also a little bit of detail.I am confident that I will be bold in the article. ![]() ![]() |
Author: gscao@henu.edu.cn Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-09-23 01:26:16 language requirements are very high!Language requirements are high!Language requirements are high!Because it is very important, say 3 timesThe editor is very good and pays attention to detail.It will take more than three months from the first article to the revised one.Minor repairs are also a little bit of detail.Have confidence in the article, boldly selectd is ![]() ![]() |
Author: gscao@henu.edu.cn Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-09-23 01:26:16 language requirements are very high!Language requirements are high!Language requirements are high!Because it is very important, say 3 timesThe editor is very good and pays attention to detail.It will take more than three months from the first article to the revised one.Minor repairs are also a little bit of detail.Have confidence in the article, boldly selectd is ![]() ![]() |
Author: gscao@henu.edu.cn Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-09-23 01:26:16 language requirements are very high!Language requirements are high!Language requirements are high!Because it is very important, say 3 timesThe editor is very good and pays attention to detail.It will take more than three months from the first article to the revised one.Minor repairs are also a little bit of detail.Have confidence in the article, boldly selectd is ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-09-20 15:34:00 Innovative requirements are relatively high ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-09-13 22:13:00 ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-06-12 22:22:00 The overall requirements are strict, the review period is very slow, and it will be returned to the reviewer after the overhaul, and it will be delayed for 2 months. Those who urgently need the article will still submit again. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-12-24 20:02:00 The first time to select for a rejection of the week, 1. The volume exceeded the standard 2. The language has not reached the standard after the submission has been reviewed for 2 and a half months, and it is not possible to send an email to rush to the Christmas... Graduation still waiting for the article anxious... ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-12-18 17:28:00 The editing efficiency is very high, less than one month in the first trial, overhaul, repaired after five weeks, accepted within one week, basically in the editor's handStay no more than a week, of course, except for format review Sep 19, 2012 submitted to the journalSep 20, 2012 with editorSep 21, 2012 with editorSep 28, 2012 Completed - Reject ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2012-09-23 12:14:00 3 marginal journal, overallLook at the rising year by year.In the field, it belongs to the mid-range journal, and has selectd for one article. The revision opinion is given in one month or so. The overhaul is received and received two days after returning. The journal is more efficient. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-06-30 12:15:00 just sent an article, I feel that the speed of reviewing is still fast, one month, minor revise, and one month after the repair, I personally think that the editing efficiency is OK.The speed of the manuscript mainly depends on the reviewer, so you can recommend a good reputation based on your past experience. People who compare Nice and work efficiently are reviewers ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Life Science技术 Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-03-21 20:55:00 .Be sure to select for the journal after you have no problem with the language.The review speed is average.The requirements for innovation are not high, and the research content is required to be informative.After submitting the manuscript, the article number with editor is usually distributed one or two days.The technical review was about a week, and then began to submit the review ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-01-24 10:32:00 German journal, the requirements are very strict, after the overhaul, minor repairs three times, the last time only changed the title one word ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-01-23 16:54:00 contributionAfter three months, the main editor was sent a reminder to reply, and the repair was received four months later. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2010-07-26 12:53:00 The biggest feeling is that the review speed is relatively slow, and the first trial is almost 4 months.The quality of the article is relatively high, and generally requires systematic and in-depth research. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2010-07-15 09:40:00 This journal is a good biotechnology, accepting a wide range of articles, whether it is molecular biology, genome, biological information, biochemistry, etc. ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page |