X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE]Hello, you are Visitor Number 77188 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleINTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE
Journal Title AbbreviationsINT J ENG SCI
ISSN0020-7225
h-index94
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
13.402.7311.988
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Engineering (all)
Q13 / 297
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Mechanical Engineering
Q116 / 596
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Mechanics of Materials
Q112 / 377
Category: Engineering
Subcategory: Materials Science (all)
Q133 / 455

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)21.60%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/278/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/JENS
Open AccessNo
PublisherPERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD, THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD, ENGLAND, OX5 1GB
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1963
Annual Article Volume106
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0020-7225%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 4.5 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 3.3 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Easy
Data from Elsevier: 9%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 4.7 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)
  Reviews on INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE: Write a review
Author: 数学物理爱好者


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-25 21:20:14
Just received an article, not easy.There must be a very new idea, very good results.The analysis should be in place.The best theory combines experiments.It took nearly half a year from submission to reception, and it took two months to complete the experiment.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 数学物理爱好者

Author: 清华


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-23 20:10:23
with editor 42 days, the editor sent an email,Dear Dr. ....,I have looked through your paper, and I have to decline it. This particular problem is of too narrow an interest for the general audience of the journal (plus, I have to limit the proportion of papers on nano- topics). I suggest youSubmit it to a more professional publication where it would have larger readership,Respectfully,Mark KachanovEditor-in-ChiefInternational Journal of Engineering Science
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 清华

Author: 大工


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-09 17:18:08
Rest assured, IJES will definitely be a cow journal in the future, and the impact factor has not broken through 10 and hurry to submit.
Show Review in Original Language
(23) Thank | 大工

Author: 上海交通大学


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-09 17:07:42
To be honest, IJES is definitely a cow journal, and the impact factor has not broken through 10.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 上海交通大学

Author: 1458943362@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-09 16:56:00
Do micro-nano mechanical, with editorAfter 6 days, the editor directly refused. I feel that the journal has a large amount of submissions. The 30 articles in the article are very normal. The number of submissions in the year is more than 3,000, and the number of publications is only 105. The editor is also refreshing and does not delay time.The paper was later transferred to composite science and technology. The review draft was published for three months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 1458943362@qq.com

Author: 1458943362@qq.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-09 16:55:51
Do micro-nano machinery, with editor 6 days later, the editor directly refused, I feel that this journal has a large amount of submissions, and 30 articles have a normal usage, with more than 3,000 submissions per year.The article was published in 105 articles. The editor-in-chief is also refreshing and does not delay time. The paper was later transferred to composite science and technology. The review draft was published for three months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 1458943362@qq.com

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-09 15:56:43
Traditional direction is generally rejected without review, editor kachanov in order to improve the impact factor, only choose tallOn or related to the household.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 星


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-09 11:14:38
is doing traditional machinery, now it is comingThe worse it is not to post in this journal, it was not like this
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 星

Author: 星


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-09 11:13:25
Doing traditional machinery, it is getting worse and worse in this journal, it was not like this before
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 星

Author: 星


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-09 10:52:15
Two reviewers gave the revised comments, the editor also refused, the traditional machinery is getting worse and bad in this journal
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 星

Author: 回力


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-07 09:00:00
Three reviewers, two overhauls, one minor repair, also rejected,
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 回力

Author: nnn


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-03 17:14:52
we are currently accepting less than 4% of submissions as a result of the ever increasing popularity of the journal. papers that may have been accepted a few years ago are now experiencing stronger competition for space inThe journal, and so we have to reject your paper.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | nnn

Author: 大连理工


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-03 12:55:41
To be honest, this journal is very bullish, with high impact factor and more people (3000).The circulation is too small.More than three judges will be rejected as long as they disagree.The three people are judged by the judges, and the two are extremely serious and benefit a lot.However, if there is a judge who does not give advice, there is only one sentence:Reject, the reason is no creativity.He nnd
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 大连理工

Author: Aid agencies


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-30 21:35:26
The recruitment rate is 3.5%, and an article is accepted in almost 30 articles!!!Being able to accept a paper in this journal shows that it is very level!!!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Aid agencies

Author: lybn


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-29 21:20:02
With Editor 73 days later, I feel that this journal editor is not responsible, and I should not use the paper urgently.Cast
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | lybn

Author: Aid agencies


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-29 17:57:35
Do the hemodynamic mechanism of heart disease, have been modified and acceptd
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Aid agencies

Author: vikky


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-27 20:27:08
is a good journal, selectd on June 22nd.The number is IJES - 2018 - 1341, indicating that the annual volume is about 2,900, 105/2900, the probability of employment is 3.6%,The description is a very good journal that is very difficult to accept!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | vikky

Author: 南航力学小博


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-16 12:04:09
Received 15 December 2017Major change 10 May 2018Rejected 31 May 2018The reviewer requested that the experiment be supplemented, because the request of the reviewer was rejected, and after the second revision was uploaded, the editor directly refused.I feel that this journal must be reviewed by the reviewers and should be related to the amount of submission.The journal is very good, but it is very difficult. It has more than 3,000 articles in a year. The 124/3000 description is not easy.Although rejected, I have to admit that this is a good journal.It is too slow and it is very time consuming.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 南航力学小博

Author: 南航力学小博


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-16 12:03:52
Received 15 December 2017Major change 10 May 2018Rejected 1 May 2018The reviewer requested that the experiment be supplemented, because the request of the reviewer was rejected, and after the second revision was uploaded, the editor directly refused.I feel that this journal must be reviewed by the reviewers and should be related to the amount of submission.The journal is very good, but it is very difficult. It has more than 3,000 articles in a year. The 124/3000 description is not easy.Although rejected, I have to admit that this is a good journal.It is too slow and it is very time consuming.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 南航力学小博

Author: 天大


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-12 13:07:21
with editor 83 days, the editor sent an email,i have looked through your paper, and i have to decline it. this particular problem is of too narrow an interest for the general audience of the journal. i suggest you submit it to a more professional publication where it would have greater readership.This kind of publication is not a general pit, hehe!I don’t want to select for students who are eager to use the article!!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 天大

Author: huhuashi


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-10 18:52:41
First-instance 62 days, return 5 reviewers' opinions.Only one reviewer has a negative opinion, and the editor-in-chief said that the new idea is not enough, saying that at least one reviewer is not recommended.Even the chances of modification are not given.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | huhuashi

Author: huhuashi


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-10 18:52:04
62 days in the first instance, returning 5 reviewers' opinions.Only one reviewer held a negative opinion, and the editor said that the new idea was not enough, saying that at least one reviewer was not recommended.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | huhuashi

Author: 浙江大学某博士


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-08 20:29:22
is doing human vascular flow dynamics, with experimental and theoretical derivation.A total of three reviewers, three are minor revisions.But they are all experts in the industry.After being sent back, the overall feeling is that the journal is relatively slow, and the first trial takes three months.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 浙江大学某博士

Author: 上交


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-25 11:48:20
Five reviewers, three recommended accepts, one overhaul, one refused, the editor has refused.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 上交

Author: w(゚Д゚)w


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-17 10:45:33
with editor for three months, did not submit for review, received the editor's email:i have looked through your paper, and i have to decline it. this particular problem is of too narrow an interest for the general audience of the journal. i suggest you submit it to a more professional publication where it would have greater readership.Little cry for a while~~~~~~~~~~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | w(゚Д゚)w

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    Next    Last  (To Page
/4)

Start your review of [INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCE]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service