INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES

2019.9.24 submit, with editor, 3 days; 2019.9.27 under review, 15 days; 2019.10.12 ready for decision, 2 days; 2019.10.14 revision request (minor revision), two reviewers, very friendly, praised us, and mentioned some small problems, 13 days; 2019.10.27 re-submit, with editor, 1 day; 2019.10.28 accept. The editor was Aichun Dong. The editing efficiency is very high. I resubmitted it at midnight on Saturday, and received the email at 5 AM earlier on Monday. Thank you very much, Professor Dong. I think the main reason for the long time wqs that the reviewers were not easy to find or the reviewers were inefficient. I wish everyone’ article will be accepted as soon as possible.

(8) Thank | YSL

The editor of the journal is very strong, and the processing speed is quite fast. Every time it is less than two days for a status update. Very responsible reviewers.

(1) Thank | whuthskjt@163.com

Submitted on February 7, 20192019.2.10 reviewer invited2019.2.11 under reviewReady for decision that day.It’s been 8 days today. The state hasn’t changed. Is it going to be cold? How can I end the review and I will not give it to me for so many days.The editor is ian sims

(5) Thank | 椒盐玉米

has submitted unknown resultsWith editor has been 2 weeks, can you deal with it as soon as possible

(5) Thank | forpaper

The editor is jf kennedy, the processing speed is very fast, the review speedIt is also fast and efficient. It is submitted to the revision for two months. The review comments are also very pertinent. A very good journal must be supported. I wish the INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES to be better and better.

(3) Thank | polymer

12.5 selectd out12.14 gave a major overhaulReturn to the revised opinion on 12.22Direct acceptance of No. 12.2712.28 school draft, the doi numberHope is getting betterEdit jf kennedy

(3) Thank | Tammy

Is this publication still in the state of reviewer invited before under review?How long will it last?

(0) Thank | jakson

My article is in the state of Ready for DecisionIt’s been a month, is it a holiday, my editor is Ian Sims

(0) Thank | 18763802351@163.com

Submitted for 31 days, or reviewer invited, did I select for it?The editor is John .F. kennedy

(0) Thank | songsbob@163.com

08.4.27 Submission08.6.10 Rework, said to be a major overhaul, but made a few comments, it is estimated that the reviewer did not read the article clearly08.6.19 review submission08.6.26 Accepted

(0) Thank | 1217120457@qq.com

Received 4 March 2018Major revision 18 May 2018Received in revised form 6 June 2018Accepted 8 June 2018Proof 9 June 2018A reviewer asked six questions to supplement the data.What is the procedure after Proof?Is there a copyright transfer program? Now the status of the article is sent to production. What is the status of the following?Can exchange: QQ: 946892599

(0) Thank | 946892599@qq.com

Purification of plant seed enzymes, and catalytic organic synthesis.The article was reviewed for two months, overhauled for two months, and the experiment was completed. After completing the overhaul, the review was submitted two weeks later, and the review was accepted one month. Two reviewers, one of the reviewers recommended by me, one by the reviewer.The opinions were very pertinent. One reviewer raised some grammar questions. One reviewer raised some professional questions. After the overhaul, the article improved a grade, submitted on January 17, 2017, and accepted on June 8, 2018.

(0) Thank | 2693376980@qq.com

review speed is very fast, jf kennedy very nice, review halfIn the month, I will give you 5.6 suggestions for modification. I will receive it on the second day after the repair. I will be online the same day!I hope the impact factor will go up!rise!rise!!

(4) Thank | smile

Submitted in December 2017, directly acceptd in April 2018, only modified some minor issuesThe editor of the journal was very helpful. The editor who accepted me was dong aichun editor. The processing speed was very fast, and the next day was under review.I selectd for biomaterials and was my first article.Thanks to the editors and reviewers for their recognition!!!Personally think that the journal is in a good direction in biomaterials, hopes are getting better and better, and the impact factors and partitions are rising and rising!

(0) Thank | C

is too slow for 3 months or under review. I hope to have a quick result

(0) Thank | 111

Luo Professor really nice, very responsible editor.Hope that the journal is getting better and better

(2) Thank | 毛毛虫

submitted the journal for the first time, from submission to recruitment for 3 months, and modified twice.Online after the accept.John F Kennedy is very nice to edit and process manuscripts very quickly.The research content should be novel and systematic.I wish the factor soared.

(0) Thank | twyla666@sina.com

review for 14 days, giving minor repair opinions, after 10 daysReworked, received one week.Speed ​​is really good, thanks to Professor Khan, really efficient

(0) Thank | 996985903@qq.com

The speed of reviewing the journal depends on the editor and the third article.New Zealand editor I. Sims dare not compliment, the processing speed is not as slow as usual, I have to deal with the manuscript every time, I am also drunk, every time, it is already the second article of the editor, sovery clear.Two articles were submitted in October 2017 (I. Sims) and December (J.F. Kennedy), but they were acceptd almost simultaneously.However, both editors are very responsible, thank you.The journal is now accepting more and more articles, and the speed of the articles is getting slower and slower. It takes almost 5-6 months for the articles to be published, and the friends who urgently need articles should pay attention to them.Attach the review schedule for two articles:(December contribution) Received at Editorial Office15 Dec 2017Article revised13 Jan 2018Article accepted for publication2 Feb 2018(October contribution) Received at Editorial Office5 Oct 2017Article revised21 Dec 2017Article accepted for publication29 Jan 2018

(8) Thank | chenguangjing2015@126.com

Has been submitted for more than 20 days, has been with editor, so slow ah ~

(0) Thank | JasonandJarry

The first submission was very smooth, and the review was quick. Professor Dong was quicker to edit, and the review comments were more pertinent. After the revision was made, the revised draft was accepted and the Ph.D. was expected.Received at Editorial Office3 Oct 2017Article revised19 Dec 2017Article accepted for publication19 Dec 2017

(2) Thank | 307484180@qq.com

Dong Professor is very fast.The status is updated one or two days at a time.From submission to reception for a total of 17 days, a minor repair in the middle.

(3) Thank | zmlizm@126.com

is like J.F. Mr. Kennedy.It took only 10 days from submission to returning opinions. With editor one day ready for decision 1 day

(2) Thank | lsx20131120a@163.com

likes Mr. J.F. Kennedy, fastIt took only 10 days from submission to returning opinions. With editor one day ready for decision 1 day

(0) Thank | lsx20131120a@163.com

One of the top professional journals of polysaccharides, the reviewer should be a small peer, each question asks the fatal part of the article, repaired several times back and forth, finally persuaded and received.The Ph.D. graduated on this article.Saved my life!It is predicted that next year's IF is likely to break 4.

(1) Thank | biochildren