X
My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

CELLULOSE

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Journal Cover Design
FREE Webinar: Guide to Publishing in Top-Tier International Journals

[CELLULOSE]Hello, you are Visitor Number 61227 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleCELLULOSE
Journal Title AbbreviationsCELLULOSE
ISSN0969-0239
E-ISSN1572-882X
h-index98
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
5.800.9111.204
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Materials Science
Subcategory: Polymers and Plastics
Q117 / 154

Self-Citation Ratio (2019-2020)20.50%
Official Websitehttps://www.springer.com/journal/10570
Online Manuscript Submissionhttps://www.editorialmanager.com/cels/default.aspx
Open AccessYes (Hybrid OA journal)
PublisherSPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS, 3311 GZ
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencyQuarterly
Year Publication Started1994
Annual Article Volume677
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0969-0239%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: Ordinary, 3-8 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Very difficult
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【CELLULOSE】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on CELLULOSE: Write a review
Author: 噬魂的小鬼


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-16 13:00:25
My focus is directly related to this field, so I thought that Cellulose would be the ideal journal to submit my graduate research. There are high requirements for language and organization, as well as innovation, for publication. My manuscript went through two rounds of revisions; it was evident that the reviewers were influential scientists in the field (no doubt many of whom I cited in my manuscript). The reviewers’ comments were helpful, although some were a little harsh. My overall impression of this journal is that you must be a well-known scientist to publish – otherwise it is fairly difficult.

(11) Thank | 噬魂的小鬼

Author: 科研狂人


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 10.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-19 17:20:17
The journal is very good, the top journals, but the requirements are also high, there must be very good innovation, the English level requirements are also high, modified three times before and after, several layers of skin go down, it is recommended that there is no majorInnovative and eager to graduate, you can look at other journals.I hope that the Cellulose impact factor will be higher.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 科研狂人

Author: 十年磨一剑


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-02-12 14:02:53
was recommended by other journals and was requested to modify the manuscript format after submission, which wasted a long time.The review speed is very fast. In the first month or so, the initial review requires additional revision experiments to provide new data.It took two months to redesign the experiment and supplement the data.Received two weeks later but requested to continue to modify the content of the article, add literature and cite new research content.It took another two weeks to modify it.After receiving proofs, the submission was completed within two days and still waiting for online.The journal is very strict, and the questions raised by the three reviewers are very detailed. One of them is more negative, and the other two are more interesting.The supplementary data is very comprehensive and the review is directly accepted.It is estimated that considering the narrow scope of the journal, the final editor requested to add a few articles, which is estimated to increase the citation rate of the journal.The editor has helped a lot in the process of submitting manuscripts.Because research is at the forefront, innovation is stronger.However, I feel very lucky to be accepted, and the experimental data is very comprehensive.Very good journal, I hope that the impact factor can be greatly improved.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 十年磨一剑

Author: 倚天利剑


Subject Area: Multidisciplinary
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2019-01-26 15:19:57
Cellulose Immediate Impact Factor: 2719/731=3.72, expected to break 4!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 倚天利剑

Author: 秤砣


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-05 18:17:39
10-30 New Submission10-31 Submissions Sent Back to Author11-02 New Submission11-06 Submissions with Production Completed11-07 Editor Assigned11-10 Editor Invited11-11 Editor Assigned11-25 Under Review12-04 Reviews CompletedThe first time I selectd for Cellulose, I hope that it will be smooth
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 秤砣

Author: nature


Subject Area: Engineering
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-12-04 16:52:16
Submitted on September 26, reviewed on October 5, updated on November 11th, or in review, now review is two months, really letPeople are in a hurry
Show Review in Original Language
(10) Thank | nature

Author: panying@hdu.edu.cn


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-06 13:58:19
21 Mar 2018 New submission26 Mar 2018 Editor Assigned30 Mar 2018 Reviewers Assigned16 Apr 2018 Under review18 Apr 2018 Under review07 May 2018 Reviews Completed13 May 2018 Major revisions12 Jun 2018 Revision Submitted14 Jun 2018 Under review18 Jun 2018 Reviews Completed21 Jun 2018 Revise27 Jun 2018 Revision Submitted28 Jun 2018 Accept
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | panying@hdu.edu.cn

Author: 饭菜


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-03 21:29:53
edited very carefully.After re-submitment, I gave a small repair editor very patient
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 饭菜

Author: kira kun


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-16 00:40:45
is made of fiber modified. It feels that the drug is easier than before. I didn’t dare to select at first. The boss said that he tried his luck and the reviewerMy work is not very well understood, and the questions raised are not very good. It is better luck.It may just be the way I am in this direction. Overall, there are quite a few high quality articles on cellulose.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | kira kun

Author: plyu@ncsu.edu


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-21 04:02:12
About transparent conductive film:Submission of 2017.12.29;2018.01.28 returned to the overhaul;Due to the supplementary experiment, the author was added, and the problem of returning the format was experienced several times in the middle;03.05 repair;03.14 is required to polish the language; the editor is responsibleDue to the delay in the Chinese New Year, it took a total of two months and twenty days.
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | plyu@ncsu.edu

Author: Jesse_d@foxmail.com


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-02 17:01:26
About the direction of photodynamic antibacterial:Submission of 2017.11.08;12.13 return to the overhaul;1.17 repair;The acceptance of No. 2.1 took a total of two months and more than twenty days.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Jesse_d@foxmail.com

Author: e


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-21 15:45:19
The time is nearly seven months, and the results are given only for the first time in four months.I repaired it three times and finally accepted it today.Edit very patient
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | e

Author: 494835248@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-06 10:21:03
submitted on September 16, 2017, rejected on the 20th, the editor said that it is very interesting but to add some contentI hope that after the revision, I will continue to select. I will submit the manuscript twice on October 1 and submit it directly for review. On November 20th, the review comments will come back. Xiao Xiu: Some words, grammar, and content are not too big.Reworked on December 1st, the editor felt that the language was not too good, and then returned to the second time.The proposal was submitted again on December 14th, and the editor still felt that it was not possible, and requested to provide a touch-up certificate to prove that it had been polished by the touch-up company.Submitted for the third time on December 30 and accepted directly on January 4.Wishing good ~
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | 494835248@qq.com

Author: madis


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-11-06 16:12:33
cellulose The review speed is now slightly reduced. It has just been an article, and it took three and a half months to accept it.I just received the previous overhaul opinion and selectd for 4 months.The journal is still relatively good.Need some innovation, and the content should be richer.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | madis

Author: jack


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-10-20 19:05:11
cellulose This year, it became a district.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | jack

Author: Xuthes


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-21 18:21:30
9月9日稿稿, October 14The day was overhauled and repaired one month later and received directly.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Xuthes

Author: poker wu


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-20 22:48:51
cellulose is really difficult..
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | poker wu

Author: Johnzhang0610@126.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-10-20 20:31:14
just got a cellulose, a small class counts a district, Chinese Academy of SciencesDivided into Zone 2, received directly after one month of overhaul, a total of 3 months, is also the first sci, to commemorate.Do not understand can contact me QQ953239718.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Johnzhang0610@126.com

Author: johnzhang0610@126.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-01 21:27:19
just submited in cellulose, I wish good luck, I feel that the journal is not popular
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | johnzhang0610@126.com

Author: Paul


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-07-05 03:16:00
The second chapter Cellulose, the whole process is relatively smooth, the manuscript processing speed is very fast, the editor is very nice.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | Paul

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-03 20:45:00
submission for two months, have not returned opinions
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-25 17:59:00
2012 impact factor ratioIn 2011, it dropped slightly, from 3.6 to 3.476. In 2013.06, I hope that the results will be returned in 2013.09. The two reviewers are satisfied with the content of the article, but one of the reviewers thinks that English is poor and must be carried out.Modifications, otherwise affecting the meaning of the text, so the editor gave the overhaul.Hurry to amend, two shots a few days later, still too rush, because the language expression caused some logical understanding errors, the editor thinks no, I hope to continue to improve, very hung, I thought it was no play, depressed.It took about two weeks to modify it carefully.2013.10 Three shots, the editor was accepted a few days later.I think the time is relatively heavy
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-08 01:31:00
very good journal, review draft received, see the journal are very fast, generally give results within 3 months!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-02 05:18:00
12FebruaryThe manuscript, after several modifications, is now accepted.The editor is very patient.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-01 11:15:00
After three months of process, I finally accepted it.Two months, I sent a letter reminder to edit kaushika mahesh (Indians?) The reply was very fast.Later, I learned that the second reviewer couldn't get in touch, and the first reviewer's opinion was very positive. "Good paper, no revision required" was just a matter of adding a few grammar and chart aesthetics.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [CELLULOSE]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.


© 2010-2021  ACCDON LLC 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, MA 02451, USA
PrivacyTerms of Service