My Account Submit My Manuscript
Letpub, Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service

BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS

   For Publishers  New

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   IF range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:
Professional Journal Cover Design
APA has partnered with LetPub to provide a full suite of author services

[BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS]Hello, you are Visitor Number 53639 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleBIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS
Journal Title AbbreviationsBIOTECHNOL LETT
ISSN0141-5492
E-ISSN1573-6776
h-index92
CiteScore
CiteScoreSJRSNIPCiteScore Rank
2.220.6410.760
Subject fieldQuartilesRankPercentile
Category: Immunology and Microbiology
Subcategory: Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
Q245 / 98
Category: Chemical Engineering
Subcategory: Bioengineering
Q263 / 139
Category: Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Subcategory: Biotechnology
Q2100 / 257

Self-Citation Ratio (2018-2019)2.70%
Official Websitehttp://www.springer.com/life+sciences/microbiology/journal/10529
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.editorialmanager.com/bile/
Open AccessNo
PublisherSPRINGER, VAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS, 3311 GZ
Subject AreaEngineering
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencySemimonthly
Year Publication Started1979
Annual Article Volume170
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0141-5492%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Authorized Data from Publisher:
Data from Authors: About 1.0 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 42%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS】CiteScore Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • CiteScore Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS: Write a review
Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-03 22:42:00
In my opinion, this journal is rather easy to get published in – the journal only requires a small amount of innovation. The one-month review period is very reasonable, especially for graduate students who are looking to publish quickly. This is a great SCI journal. I do, however, recommend that all submissions are written in the format requested by the journal and that the language is polished prior to submission.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: 914735630@qq.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-31 09:24:03
The article has been received, saying that it is 2-3 weeks online, but now it has been more than a month, no news, I don't know what happened, I dare not send an email to ask the editor.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 914735630@qq.com

Author: 西瓜烤红薯


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-06-22 13:17:42
submitted for 2 weeks and received it directly.Happy
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 西瓜烤红薯

Author: bz


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-08-10 09:37:06
The review speed is very fast, and the results are fed back in 3 weeks.The journal has a high standard of language and writing.After I was repaired, I was re-repaired. It was edited by the editor-in-chief.Very responsible and responsible for the editor of nice.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | bz

Author: bz


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-08-10 09:36:56
The review speed is very fast, and the results are fed back in 3 weeks.The journal has a high standard of language and writing.After I was repaired, I was re-repaired. It was edited by the editor-in-chief.Very responsible and responsible for the editor of nice.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | bz

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-28 16:56:00
was rejected one month, before the brothers selectd an article, the editor reply similarity is too high, halo
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-19 16:17:00
Select Submission Classifications,,, can not be selected, is empty, dizzyNow!!!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-14 17:08:00
I submitted it in 13.8.12. The journal's submission system is not very useful.But the speed of review is as fast as many people say.13.8.12 Even in the evening, NEW SUBMISSION, 13.8.13 was already assigned by Editor in the morning, but I got the message in the morning of 13.8.14, because the content was too light and was directly rejected..Reject: results too slight*/results too preliminary* is the opinion given by Editor in chief, so it is more informative.We receive m
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-06 23:00:00
Just submitted an article today, insecticidal protein microcapsules,,, blessing can be....2 weeks, no information yet..Calm..Nearly 3 weeks of tragedy..It is said that the experiment is incomplete and it is recommended to do biometric tests..Halo, our lab can't do that..
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-25 18:08:00
Submitted for 2 months, the efficiency is high, as long as the content is new.The editor is very responsible.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-04-07 13:38:00
Two weeks after submission, return to review comments
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-03-22 11:27:00
I have been submiting for 20 days, and I have been NEW SUBMISSION.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-30 16:50:00
Writing in strict accordance with the requirements of the journal before submission, the review is very fast.Be novel, short and fine.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-01-29 22:55:00
Edit reply: We have removed your submission from our submission queue. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-03 11:08:00
under review 3 weeks, seeking calm ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-23 23:53:00
Please consult, after the revision is submitted, is it in the state of Editor Assigned?How long does it usually give the result
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-06-12 15:39:00
as long as the article is innovative, it is quite fast.I have revised comments after 1 week of submission, minor repairs.Be carefully revised according to the reviewer's comments, especially paying attention to the format of the article.Prepare to return the revised comments in these two days, I hope everything goes well~~~:)
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-21 17:25:00
Submitted in the previous period, was pitted, rejected after 2 revisions, saying that my last modification did not meet the requirements.Directly rejected, without any detailed reasons.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-20 09:40:00
I would like to ask this journal is a few districts
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-02-26 08:15:00
reviewing the speed is very fast, what is the December 27th select, January 20th notice overhaul,Return to 3 days to receive ~ Note that the modification should meet the requirements of the BL itself for each part, such as the number of words in the abstract, etc., strictly follow the author guidence to write well
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-01-10 20:18:00
format and language requirementsHigh, review is fast, the article requires a short and precise, slightly innovative.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-29 13:01:00
format and language requirements are high, review is fast, three days to give a letter of rejection, the article requires a short and fine, slightlyInnovative can
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-12-09 10:49:00
20101.768
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-11-21 19:27:00
must have a new format to be changed in advance to change at least almost
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-09 08:57:00
feelingIt is relatively easy, and the quality requirements of the article are not very high. Many teachers and students in China have selectd here.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [BIOTECHNOLOGY LETTERS]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Intentional Space Tag


Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.

Security Code*

© 2010-2020 United States: ACCDON LLC Tel: 1-781-202-9968 Email: info@accdon.com
Address: 400 5th Ave, Suite 530, Waltham, Massachusetts 02451, United States
LetPub Privacy Policy