Biotechnology for Biofuels

Late sharing: For small research groups who have never published in BFB, and those waiting for graduation, the process will be relatively difficult. This is an old brand journal in the field of biomass energy, which is highly recognized in foreign countries than in China. In recent years, BT has grown rapidly. 2019.9.26 submitted; 2019.10.9 under review; 2019.12.8 major revision; 2019.1.7 re-submitted; 2019.1.17 accepted; 2019.4.1 April Fool's Day, online. I don't understand, it is a journal that charges page fees, why the proofreading was delayed for almost 3 months, and the typesetting editor hadn't moved for a long time. The entire submission process was incredibly long. If you don't have enough time for submission, it is not recommended to submit to BFB only.

(6) Thank | T.

The journal has high requirements for innovation and a certain amount of work. The editor was very responsible, and the processing efficiency was high! 2019.09.02, submission; 2019.09.06, sent for review; 2019.10.12, major revision; 2019.11.07, the revised manuscript was submitted; 2019.11.11, the editor accepted it directly. It is the Q1 top journal in biomass energy, which has a high evaluation in the industry!

(1) Thank | 卖火柴的小王子

2019.04.08 submitted; 2019.04.19 with editor; 2019.04.21 under review; 2019.05.14 major revise; 2019.06.11 resubmitted; 2019.06.16 accepted.

(0) Thank | 老冬瓜

Biotechnology for Biofuels is an authoritative journal in the field of bioenergy. This journal publishes more than 100 articles a year, and there are many stages of review; thus, the innovation of the research published is high. The current editor is professional and responsive. This publication is prominent in the field of bioenergy in Europe and the US. Based on my experience, the review speed is very fast; often times the first round of reviews are returned in less than 3 weeks. The impact factor is currently above 6, and I think that the impact factor will continue to increase given that bioenergy is a popular field for study.

(13) Thank | JY

2018.10.06 submitted2018.10.13 assigned reviewers2018.10.20 with editor- under review2018.10.29 major revise2018.11.26 resubmitted2018.11.29 acceptedEmail reply is expected to be online after 2 weeks online

(2) Thank | 太阳hld8124

After the first submission was overhauled, the editor encouraged the re-submitment of additional data.Accept directly after the heavy submitment overhaul.It lasted for a year before and after.Héctor A. Ruiz Very nice!

(0) Thank | 810095629

first timeSubmission, to tell the truth, the little heart can't stand it, and then slowly get used to it, but fortunately the final result is good.2018.04.12 submited2018.04.20 with editor2018.04.30 under review2018.06.2 major revise2015.06.26 resubmitted2018.07.05 accepted

(0) Thank | 279918580@qq.com

2018.2.19 submit2018.3.18 minor revision2018.4.4 acceptManuscript processing is faster

(0) Thank | hdpeng89@gmail.com

2017.09.08 submited2017.09.30 with editor2017.10.20 under review2017.11.30 major revision2018.01.04 accept

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The first article was reviewed for 4 months and rejected.The second article was applied for 1 month and was directly acceptd (starting with the first article, and for the first time in 8 years, it is not necessary to modify it for the first time).I feel that although the first article has a large amount of data, 40% overlaps with the predecessors; although the second article is not very large, it is indeed innovative and tells a more complete story.So both reviewers are directly accepted.

(1) Thank | laoqi

reviewing the high efficiency, but the requirements are also high, 25 days after the submission is rejected

(0) Thank | LSM99

The lab has been tragedy several times before, and it has finally been repeated recently!Submission experience: reviewing drafts is more efficient, more than 20 days in the first instance; five reviewers in the first instance, the opinions are more professional; the reviewers are foreigners, and the language requirements are relatively high; the editors pay great attention to the reviewers' opinions, and I am aThe reviewer’s comments were reviewed three times.Overall feeling: authoritative journal in the field of bioenergy!IF is higher and will go up, but the requirements are really high and need to highlight research highlights.

(4) Thank | Underwood

This journal is too embarrassing, five reviewers, 60 comments, fortunately did not refuse to give a major repair, the first trial is quite fast 35 daysI hope that I can do it in a journal that dreams of dreams.

(4) Thank | 晓冉

Magazine is very demandingThe workload is quite large, with a strong focus on innovative and original insights.Authoritative journals in the field of bioenergy have been rejected several times in the laboratory.If the results are innovative, it is recommended that you select for this journal as a symbol of bioenergy status.Submitted for two months, although the tragedy, but the comments from the reviewers are in place, from the language should be three old foreigners!2015.06.08 submited2015.06.14 with editor2015.06.20 under review2015.07.28 rejected

(9) Thank | chenxin@hotmail.com

2013.2.24 投出2013.2.18 under review2013.4.2 editorial decision making2013.5.21 major revise2013.6.19 Revised 2013.6. 26 minor revise2013.7.2 Revised 2013.7.5 editorial accepted over 4 yearsThe month was finally received. The editor of this journal is very good. I will write a letter and ask questions soon.The article on the innovation of the

(5) Thank | Anonymous

journal homepage URL: http://http://www.biotechnologyforbiofuels.com/ online submission URL: http://www.biote

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2011 if: 6.09 higher impact factor

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Homepage: http://www.biotechnologyforbiofuels.com/ Currently IF reaches 6, it is still very good.The page fee is higher, but you can apply for a reduction.

(0) Thank | Anonymous