BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING

It was submitted on July 22, it was firstly “selecting for review”, and then “assigning for review”, and then it changed to “selecting for review”, and this status lasts until now. I am panic, I don’t know what the situation is.

(5) Thank | 21LLL23

The first time I submitted to this journal, I felt that the requirements for publication were quite strict. The reviews were completed within 1 month; there were three peer reviewers. Two reviewers recommended acceptance pending minor revisions, while the other reviewer suggested major revision. Overall, it was not a terrible experience but the editor was extremely slow to respond to any inquiries. After our manuscript was accepted, it was selected for a video abstract by the editorial department. Unfortunately, because there was no indication of this in advance, we could not complete the video abstract in the amount of time allotted by the journal. If you submit to this journal, be prepared for a video abstract request (apparently this is common).

(0) Thank | Anonymous

17-03-27 Submission;17-06-24 Return to the review comments, minor repairs;17-07-12 Accepted.The cycle is longer than I thought.The journal has a small number of articles per year, and the requirements are still quite high.Innovative, experimental results, language.Good luck ~

(2) Thank | xiaodanxdz

became the Assigning Editor three days after submitting the manuscript. After two days, the editor-in-chief refused, saying that the manuscript is rich, not the quality of the manuscript, but the publishing space is limited.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

good journal, in our school belongs to the top 100.On July 12th, the August 7th overhaul.Returned on September 30, the National Day has come back.quite fast.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

A week, still in the assigning editors, I don’t know if it’s awkward.I thought about this very quickly, I didn't expect the first step to be so slow.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

has selectd for 3 articles this year, and fortunately, 2 articles were rejected.A revision was sent to the chemosphere. BB is a journal of Willy, the impact factor has not been very high, but the influence in the industry is huge, together with EST, Water research and called the three major ace journals in the environmental field.I personally think that the quality of the article is better than Water research.The editor is very bullish, and there is basically no chance of irrigation. In 2011, there were 12 domestic articles, of which Yu Hanqing’s laboratory accounted for 4 articles.The review speed is very fast. Generally, the editor should have 7-14 days for the first trial and 14 days for the external trial.Sending these articles is also a good example of the natural fund that failed this year. I will apply again next year...

(3) Thank | Anonymous

is a very good journal, and it is faster regardless of whether it is received or rejected.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

was a half-monthly journal, and now it has been published in a monthly journal. It was directly edited by the editor.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

In the past two years, many metabolic engineering big cows have alreadyTransferring the direction of submission, basically not publishing articles on BB, all turned to ME to submit the manuscript...I have to ask Mr. Zhong to pay attention to this trend...

(1) Thank | Anonymous

The speed of reviewing is also high, the requirements are high, and the rate of rejection of domestic submissions is very high. Anyway, it is written by Chinese people. Most of them will pick up the language and ask for the experiment.Very high, more difficult

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The old-fashioned top-level journals in the biotechnology category have a high rejection rate. Recently submitted a manuscript, submitted on May 17, and the editorial notice on July 8th, the problem is notMore, but asked to change the full text into a communication to the editor on August 13th to return the revised draft, August 30 editors return, let the language change to find a translation company to help modify, September 4 return to the revised draft, September 7The day of receiving the teacher Zhong Jianjiang is still very nice. The key to the submission of the novel is to have a novelty. I wish you all success

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Journal homepage: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0290

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Rejection rate is very high

(0) Thank | Anonymous

very good journal

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The top journal in the downstream field of bioengineering,The impact factor is generally high and has risen rapidly in recent years, mainly because it has received a large number of articles from upstream and interdisciplinary subjects.Orthodox articles are very readable.The number published annually in the country is generally in single digits.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I have seen this journal editor, D.S. Clark, and he talked to him that B&B is now more focused on original articles, which is the novelty in your article.He wants to constantly improve B&B's IF and do a top journal in biotechnology.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Previous articles included in BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOENGINEERING are mostly engineering studies, and there is now a trend toward upstream research.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

1) Wiley's journal, IF is not as exaggerated as the publication in Sciencedirect.2) It is difficult to send, and there are 10 articles in the country every year.3) Great influence, engaging in authoritative publications in biology, articles like model 4) Chinese editors turned in Zhong Jianjiang, and the rate of rejection of the initial review was very high.In general, the excellent publication

(0) Thank | Anonymous