Because it was an article invitation, the processing speed was relatively fast. The modification requirements of the article were relatively high, and it was necessary to write in an imperative tone. Although it was an invitation, the review was strict. And the three reviewers had detailed review comments. Then we made an appointment to shoot the video. There were still a few months before the official publication. Generally speaking, the review period was relatively long.

(2) Thank | Dr. Tree

Our published article is a description of the method of drug administration to the inner ear in mice. The editor invited us to contribute after reading articles we published in the past. After submission, the review comments came after a little more than 2 months; two reviewers, requested minor revision. The paper was accepted about 1 month after revision. Then the editor contacted us to schedule the time and place for the recording, and they have designated video photographers in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, etc. From the video recording to official publication was about 3 months. The journal mainly focuses on descriptions of methods. Contributions can be invited or unsolicited. It is not difficult to get accepted, but the cycle is long.

(0) Thank | guopengent@163.com

Our published article is a description of the method of administration of the inner ear in mice.The editor contacted us through the articles we published in the past, and submitted the review comments more than 2 months after submitting the manuscripts, two reviewers, Xiao Xiu.Received about 1 month after repairing as required.Then the editor will contact the time and place of the scheduled recording, and there will be a designated video agent in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, etc. The video will be officially published for about 3 months.The journal is mainly a description of the methodology, can be submitted in a draft, or free to submit, it is not difficult, but the cycle is long.

(4) Thank | guopengent@163.com