Given the diversity and complexity of organisms, it is not a problem to produce different results and publish them, as scientific research itself allows and encourages questioning, supplementing, improving, and even overturning previous knowledge. When writing a paper, we need some strategies, focusing mainly on two points: truthfully presenting materials and methods, especially highlighting discrepancies with others, in detail; in the discussion section, do not avoid contradictions, compare similarities and differences with previous studies, and try to provide reasonable and effective explanations

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The relationship between the results of this study and relevant theories; the limitations or shortcomings of your research; the practical significance and application value of this study; suggestions for future research

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What can be discussed in a discussion?

(0) Thank | 八坂篷蔚

How do I handle it when my discussion results don't align with my previously published articles?

(0) Thank | 深渊兴业

Did you win later?

(0) Thank | 无影建刚

Probably too cold, I doubt if there is no editorial review, no comments for reviewers for 3 months

(0) Thank | Bertha

Review speed: 4.0 experience sharing: It is probably too niche. I suspect that there is no editor reviewing it. It has been three months and no one has given any feedback for review

(0) Thank | 太虚康震

As long as we can maintain the SCI source journals, that's all that matters. If the school starts using CiteScore for evaluation, there's nothing to worry about. On one hand, CiteScore includes a wider range of journals, so our journal will definitely be included. Additionally, it benefits smaller journals, so the disparity between journals won't be as drastic. I hope the school adopts CiteScore

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁