It is about space electric propulsion. 2020.7.13, submitted; 2020.8.25, the results of the first review were returned. There were 14 comments. The reviewers also helped to revise several language issues. I replied one by one; 2020.9.15, the results of the second review were returned. There was one review. The reviewer said that there was a value that he felt was too small, and let me to explain. After checking, I found that it was wrongly written when transcribing the data. The manuscript was returned after revision; 2020.9.17, accepted. The editor should not send it back to the reviewers, but accepted it directly. However, the publication fee is too high, which was USD 2,050.

(4) Thank | 阿三爱阿笠

An aeronautical test article. On December 7, 2019 It was submitted; on January 27, 2020, first review comments returned, there are about 7 questions, and I answered them one by one; On March 26, 2020, the second review comments returned. One question. It is recommended to add data, but I disagreed; it was accepted on April 14, 2020.

(1) Thank | 航空小瓦工

The submission system is relatively simple, which is much simplified, comparing with other complicated submission procedures. The editor who typeset was still very responsible and help you correct grammatical errors. Currently it ranks 16/31 in JCR Q3. As long as it goes one step forward, it can enter Q2. Please cite papers from it more. The reviewers were quite professional, who were all experts in the industry, and their opinions were more pertinent. The speed of publication and publication online was very fast. The only bad thing was that it was too expensive, 1900 dollars...

(2) Thank | TYG

November 20, 2017 submitted; January 22, 2018, peer review results came back, major revision. It took us two weeks to revise it. Accepted on February 12, 2018. $1750 in publication fee, so expensive.

(4) Thank | 为求毕业的博士狗

The reviewers don't seem to know what they want. They recommended several articles for me to read, but it turns out they were all written by the same author. These articles have nothing to do with my work, yet I am required to study and follow them. One reviewer asked strange and irrelevant questions about a basic topic with existing precedents. After submitting the revised manuscript, it was ultimately rejected. It's hard to believe this is an open-access journal. It's been over four months, and I have had to deal with eight different reviewers, each time making changes according to their feedback only to be assigned to a new reviewer.

(0) Thank | qcc

Rejected, relieved, it took nearly three months, indeed slow.

(0) Thank | qcc

It has changed from pending approval to AE assigned

(0) Thank | qcc

It's been over a week and we still don't know what's going on with pending approval

(0) Thank | qcc

Brother, after my first round of revisions, they said my paper had risks. The second round of revisions was minor, but the third round has been pending approval for a month now

(0) Thank | rrrsd

After the first minor revision, I was told that my paper may be suspected of peer manipulation and needed to be re-evaluated. After the re-evaluation, I was given another minor revision. However, after the second minor revision, the paper entered a pending approval status directly. This status has been ongoing for a month. During this time, I asked the editor, who said it was undergoing quality checks. Has anyone encountered a similar situation, and how much longer will it take to be accepted?

(0) Thank | rrrsd

Reviewer's comment: There are some innovative aspects, but it's better to reject it

(0) Thank | qcc

You are better off rejecting me

(0) Thank | qcc

Choose according to your workload, mine is too heavy, and reviewers suggest submitting to a different journal

(0) Thank | qcc

It has been a week since we invited the reviewer, but we have not been able to invite them yet

(0) Thank | qcc

I would like to ask OP, are you still waiting for further instructions? I have been in the AE assigned status for over half a month. Will it take much longer?

(0) Thank | Daniel

Changed the email address, and the recipient received it

(0) Thank | hoyo

Has the problem been resolved? I also encountered this situation recently and I don't know what to do

(0) Thank | cha五此人

Looking at the recent events, Hindawi Publishing Corporation is basically in big trouble. They seem unable to handle their normal business at the moment. I submitted an article for minor revisions in December last year, and it has been pending approval for 4 months. During this period, they suddenly claimed there were risks in the peer review process and needed further review. After waiting for 2 more months, it was still pending approval. When I emailed them, they either didn't reply or sent template responses that didn't solve any problems. I promptly withdrew my submission and sent it elsewhere. Open-access journals are so slow and have a bad attitude. I advise against submitting to Hindawi to avoid being in the same situation as authors from the previous batch, who got their articles published but then the journal was removed from SCI without being indexed, which was quite foolish.

(0) Thank | zzz12345

Associate Editor is already assigned, Academic Editor unassigned.

(0) Thank | Laplace

Hello, may I ask if this journal has any requirements for article length?

(0) Thank | hhxxo

Hello, may I ask if this journal has any requirements for the length of articles?

(0) Thank | hhxxo

Last November, I also sent this confirmation. You can just reply directly. It's really slow, until now there is still no initial review result, and the editor does not reply to emails. They even changed an academic editor in the meantime, but still no response to emails.

(0) Thank | pytorch_null

I subscribed to this magazine at the beginning of the month, but received a modification request that says "We would like to receive your confirmation of the final authorship for this manuscript." After replying to the email, it seems like the editor did not receive my message. I have reminded them several times to reply to my email. Has anyone else encountered this situation, friends...

(0) Thank | hoyo

2022. 11.9 - submit
2023. 1.20 - minor revision request

(0) Thank | Williamfantacy

2022-08-21: Submitted
2022-10-29: Major Revision Requested
2022-11-16: Revised
2022-11-28: The revised manuscript addresses all the comments of the reviewers satisfactorily. The manuscript is recommended for publication in the Journal.
2022-11-29: Accepted
2022-11-30: Publish (waiting online)

(1) Thank | 好好学液发