Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | Botanical Studies | ||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | BOT STUD | ||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 1999-3110 | ||||||||||||||||
h-index | 43 | ||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 2.40% | ||||||||||||||||
期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||
Official Website | https://www.springer.com/journal/40529 | ||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://www.editorialmanager.com/BOST | ||||||||||||||||
Open Access | Yes | ||||||||||||||||
Publisher | ONE NEW YORK PLAZA, SUITE 4600 , NEW YORK, United States, NY, 10004 | ||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | PLANT SCIENCES | ||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | TAIWAN | ||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | |||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 2013 | ||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 33 | ||||||||||||||||
Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||
OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||
WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1999-3110%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: 13 Weeks | ||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: | ||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on Botanical Studies: | Write a review |
Author: 我的幸福会长大 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-04-23 16:15:51 The manuscript was submitted in November 2019; the first review comments were received and the revised manuscript was sent back in early February 2020; the second review comments were received and the revised manuscript was sent back in early March 2020; it was accepted in mid-April 2020. ![]() ![]() |
Author: wuhuigensheng Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2015-12-12 14:24:19 Submitted on September 20, 2015. Now 3 months have passed, and the paper is still in the “Reviewers assigned” state. We have sent three emails to the editorial office. The first one they replied but the next two no reply at all. Anyone who needs a paper soon, don’t submit here. Comments by others: 1. I received a reply from the editorial office today, told me to revise and re-submit. I submitted the manuscript on July 1, and afterward I had asked about the paper 4 times and was always told to wait. Only on November 1, I received the comments of the first round of review. However, the reviewers gave their comments as early as July 21, so you can see how long it was delayed by the editor. This journal does not respect authors, and often takes 3 or 4 months to reply to authors. The decision was revision and re-submit, what a waste of time! Students who are eager to publish their papers must not submit here. Its impact factor is not high, and they are particularly irresponsible to the authors. A painful lesson for me. 2. This journal is very slow. It was fast in the past few years. In recent years, the editors have been particularly irresponsible. The first review could take months, so everyone, do not submit here. 3. Slow journal, do not submit. The review was super slow, even though it used to be quite fast. It’s been 4 months since my submission, and I still haven’t received the comments from the initial round of review. I emailed the editor a few times but got no reply. Don't submit here if you need a paper soon. 4. Too slow, do not submit here. The first review could drag on for a few months. It wastes your time, and the impact factor is not high. ![]() ![]() |
Author: linzhenghe@126.com Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-12-28 09:07:35 speed is still a comparison block, published in less than three months.For students who want to graduate, it is still good ![]() ![]() |
Author: li_hu2009@163.com Subject Area: Life Science Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted directly Write a review |
Reviewed 2016-07-26 16:58:09 May 9th contribution, minor repair on June 13, and then received after July 24th, okay, less than three months. ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page |