Submitted: 5 April 2020; Major revision: 4 June; Revision submitted: 10 July; Minor revision: 7 August, Revision submitted: 20 August; Minor revision: 1 September; Revision submitted: 4 September; Accept: 13 September.

(12) Thank | Nasar

2019.11.11 Submission; 2020.1.13 Major revision; 2020. 3.23 Revised submission; 2020.4.26 Minor revision; 2020.4.28 Revised submission; 2020.6.28 Accepted (50 days after the last revised submission, I reminded the manuscript and was asked to revise some minor issues. It was accepted three or four days after the revised submission).

(0) Thank | Good

06-oct-2019, submission; 23-dec-2019, major revision; 29-jan-2020, the revision submitted; 09-Mar-2020; minor revision.

(0) Thank | 2020加油

23-feb-2018 awaiting admin processing; 25-feb-2018 under review, major revision; 05-jul-2018 awaiting admin processing; 19-jul-2018 under review; 12-sep-2018 major revision; 09-nov-2018 submitted, awaiting admin processing; 21-nov-2018 under review; 12-jan-2019 accepted after minor revision; 28-jan-2019 Online.

(2) Thank | 筷子辣椒德芙

2021.10.5 submitted
2021.12.9 major revision
2022.2.16 minor revision
2022.3.2 accept

(0) Thank | 晚风恰好温柔

After one month with the editor, it took another month under review. After submitting for revision, it took another month under review.

(0) Thank | JiaoFL

Where can I download the manuscript that the reviewers returned for this journal?

(2) Thank | the girl

The magazine is too slow, taking 4 months to review my submission, only to reject it and encourage me to resubmit. The editorial review level is not good, just some grammar or other minor issues. One minor revision and one major revision, but the suggestions for the major revision are also very minor. In summary, it took a long time and the experience of submitting was very poor. I had to follow up twice during the process.

(0) Thank | lv

May I ask how long did you submit it for review with the editor?

(0) Thank | 军哥93

The journal quality is relatively high, and the requirements are also relatively high.

(0) Thank | JiaoFL

Hello, may I ask how long it takes for you to receive the initial review results after submitting your contribution?

(0) Thank | 梦里花香

In my personal opinion, it was quite difficult. I only found one reviewer, who examined it very carefully and pointed out numerous minor and major issues. However, the editor rejected it outright, stating that this journal rejects over 85% of the submissions.

(0) Thank | 南城旧梦

I have been waiting for 24 days now, and currently it is still in the "With Journal Administrator" status. Have there been any new developments? It makes me doubt if I am out of the running or if I made a mistake.

(0) Thank | 禾—苗

It has been nearly three months now, and it is still with the editor. Over 20 days ago, I asked the editor and they said they were still looking for reviewers. It has been so many days since then, and they still haven't found any.

(0) Thank | tttttttsssss

I am also in the same situation as you, may I ask if you have submitted for review now?

(0) Thank | 南城旧梦

I submitted it to the editor over 20 days ago, has it still been with the editor for over two weeks now? Why is it taking so long?

(2) Thank | tttttttsssss

archives of agronomy and soil science23-feb-2018 awaiting admin processing25-feb-2018 under review, major revision05-jul-2018 awaiting admin processing19-jul-2018 under review12-sep-2018 major revision09-nov-2018 submitted,awaiting admin processing21-nov-2018 under review12-Jan-2019 accepted after minor revision

(1) Thank | 筷子辣椒德芙

archives of agronomy and soil science23-feb-2018 awaiting admin processing25-feb-2018 under review, major revision05-jul-2018 awaiting admin processing19-jul-2018 under review12-sep-2018 major revision09-nov-2018 submitted,awaiting admin processing21-nov-2018 under review

(1) Thank | 筷子辣椒德芙

archives of agronomy and soil science23-feb-2018 awaiting admin processing25-feb-2018 under review, major revision05-jul-2018 awaiting admin processing19-jul-2018 under review12-Sep-2018 Major revision09-Nov-2018 submitted, awaiting admin processing

(0) Thank | 筷子辣椒德芙

I have done several times for reviewers of this journal. In general, the journal requirements are not high. Many of the articles sent to me are not very good, but the editors still submit them for review.In recent years, the impact factor has risen relatively quickly, but it may remain at around 2.The general editor gives a month's review time, and it will be as soon as one month. If the comments have not been returned, the editor will send an email to remind you.In general, journals that are not difficult, the speed of reviewing varies from person to person. I usually give advice for one month, which is suitable for students who are eager to essay.

(6) Thank | 三十二画生

Slow, anxious conclusions and careful consideration of graduation!It takes a long time for reviewers and contributors at each stage, not too long...

(2) Thank | 苗大侠

is not difficult, and it is received after minor repairs. The disadvantage is that the review time is relatively long. 4 months return to modify

(0) Thank | DundeeKang

archives of agronomy and soil science23-feb-2018 awaiting admin processing25-feb-2018 under review, major revision05-jul-2018 awaiting admin processing19-jul-2018 under review submitted the draft, and now re-review, hope to be in the middle!

(1) Thank | 筷子辣椒德芙

archives of agronomy and soil science23-feb-2018 awaiting admin processing25-feb-2018 under review,major revision05-Jul-2018 awaiting admin processingBecause I didn't register, I don't know how to change the state I wrote below, so I copied it again and added the latest information.

(0) Thank | 筷子辣椒德芙

Archives of agronomy and soil science23-feb-2018 awaiting admin processing25-feb-2018 Under ReviewBecause I didn't register, I don't know how to change the state I wrote below, so I copied it again and added the latest information.

(1) Thank | 筷子辣椒德芙