Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | Applied Physics Reviews | ||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | APPL PHYS REV | ||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 1931-9401 | ||||||||||||||||
h-index | 40 | ||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 1.30% | ||||||||||||||||
期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||
Official Website | http://scitation.aip.org/content/aip/journal/apr2 | ||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | http://apr.peerx-press.org/cgi-bin/main.plex | ||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||
Publisher | 1305 WALT WHITMAN RD, STE 300, MELVILLE, USA, NY, 11747-4501 | ||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | PHYSICS, APPLIED | ||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | UNITED STATES | ||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | |||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 0 | ||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 140 | ||||||||||||||||
Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||
OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||
WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1931-9401%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: | ||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: | ||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
|
|
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on Applied Physics Reviews: | Write a review |
Author: Hill Actaeon Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-06-26 17:58:25 The American Physical Society's flagship journal, Physical Review A, has seen an increase in the number of articles published over the past two years. However, the difficulty remains high, and the quality of the papers is very high, making them very representative and groundbreaking in the field. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 一念狂心 Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-06-20 22:20:30 Received a few months ago, the impact factor was cut in half, and the journal has been downgraded to tier two in the Chinese Academy of Sciences rankings. The operations of this publishing house are very poor. ![]() ![]() |
Author: beiwu Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-06-17 09:56:11 Submitted on March 12, reviewed on March 21, received editorial comments on April 18, accepted in May. It's pretty fast ![]() ![]() |
Author: 一个达不溜 Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-05-30 20:36:34 Do all authors have to provide their ORCID iD? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 哈哈哈1112 Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-04-29 01:06:29 Do all authors need to provide an ORCID iD in order to move on to the next step? ![]() ![]() |
Author: beiwu Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-03-27 16:00:08 How many reviewers does this journal usually have? How long does it usually take to receive reviewer's feedback after submission? ![]() ![]() |
Author: hitlyz Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-02-13 13:49:35 The application was submitted on January 31st, but it is still in "Under consideration" status as of February 13th. The internal review process is quite slow ![]() ![]() |
Author: 糊糊哈哈 Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-01-20 19:55:24 The efficiency of handling scripts by the screenwriter is decent, with two previous submissions being rejected within three days. The most recent submission took two weeks for review, with major and minor revisions before acceptance, totaling about four months from start to finish. The journal, "APR," is highly reputed in the field of applied physics, with over one hundred articles published annually. Approximately 30% of these articles are authored by Chinese researchers, with reviews and articles each accounting for about half of the publications. Reviews are mostly by invitation, while articles, numbering in the tens each year, are more challenging to submit ![]() ![]() |
Author: pfliu Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-12-28 15:09:05 Speed is fine, but it's a physics-based area ![]() ![]() |
Author: * Timeless Subject Area: Physics与天体Physics Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-09-06 17:01:36 The quality of APR is quite good, and its development is also getting better. Reviewers generally respond within two weeks, and editors also respect the opinions of reviewers ![]() ![]() |
Author: 发发发发呀发 Subject Area: 材料科学 Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-01-01 08:04:29 9.9.22 submit 09.17.22 securing reviewer 09.20.22 under review 09.25.22 securing reviewer 09.27.22 under review 10.11.22 editorial evaluation-editor 10.11.22 Decision Letter being Prepared 中修,两个reviewer, 一个建议投chemistry相关的刊+提了4个意见,另一个reviewer很positive 提了5个意见 11.19.22 resubmit 12.19.22 decision letter- accepted Translation: 9.9.22 submit 09.17.22 securing reviewer 09.20.22 under review 09.25.22 securing reviewer 09.27.22 under review 10.11.22 editorial evaluation-editor 10.11.22 Decision Letter being Prepared During revision, two reviewers, one suggested submission to a chemistry-related journal and provided 4 comments, while the other reviewer was very positive and provided 5 comments. 11.19.22 resubmit 12.19.22 decision letter- accepted ![]() ![]() |
Author: 打牛 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-08-11 22:33:43 The latest upgraded version in December 2021, why is it in the second district and not a top-tier journal? Is it to surpass domestic journals? ![]() ![]() |
Author: jinye9475 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-10-12 11:12:45 I received an invitation to submit a review article from the APR editor because of other research articles I had already published. At that time, I happened to be writing a review article, so I asked the editor if it would be acceptable. They said it was, but they mentioned that the scope of my original content was too small and asked me to expand it and write a longer article. They gave me a deadline of six months. Following the editor's advice, I completed the writing and submitted it. The editor and two reviewers provided feedback, and while there were no major issues, one of the reviewers pointed out twice that the direction of my review did not align with the scope of the APR journal. After my first explanation was ineffective, I responded and made revisions, which were then accepted. It seems that the editor held more authority in this decision. Despite some difficulties, the overall process went smoothly, and communication with the editor was very smooth and efficient, leaving me with a positive impression. ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page |