Ten days after the manuscript was submitted, the first review comments returned. We revised it and resubmitted it in one week, and it was directly accepted. It took 26 days in total from submission to online publication. The editor was responsible, and followed up and communicated with us for the status of the manuscript in time.

(0) Thank | Loriain-HH

It was very quick. The reviewers' comments were received after more than ten days, and the revision was completed in a week. It got accepted directly after two days.

(0) Thank | 小虫子

The review was fast, and it was accepted directly after the major revision was made. A total of 23 days was spent. The editor is very friendly.

(0) Thank | haha

Please translate the following paragraph into English: https://www.mdpi.com/journal/micromachines/special_issues/NGEJ891O4E

(0) Thank | YupeiJJ

This year, submitting to the journal automatically entitles you to a reduction of 500CHF, which means the APC is 2100CHF, and additional discounts can be enjoyed based on the relevance of the submission.

(0) Thank | YupeiJJ

The topics include but are not limited to energy harvesting technology, energy harvester structural design, adaptive/self-tuning energy harvester, vibration characteristics analysis, metamaterials, dynamic modeling, power management systems, interface circuit design, etc. The scope of submission is wide and the review process is fast (yupeijian@swjtu.edu.cn).

(0) Thank | YupeiJJ

Recently, we have launched a special issue on "self-tuning and self-powered energy harvesting devices" in this journal. We welcome interested teachers to submit articles and consult.

(0) Thank | YupeiJJ

We are currently organizing a Special Issue on memristors and photonic memristors. I am the guest editor. If you have suitable manuscripts, please feel free to contact me at liyuan-long@hdu.edu.cn.

(0) Thank | me

Submitted on 23.10.13, two reminder emails were sent, but there was no review feedback by 23.12.28. Originally wanted to expedite the graduation process, but not only was it slow, the price also increased to 2600 CHF, over 20,000 RMB. Today, I sent an email to withdraw the submission, hoping to quickly end this MDPI ordeal

(3) Thank | 九龙塘飞天小婉儿

What is the current status now?

(0) Thank | bzn

We are currently working on a special issue on additive manufacturing of metal-ceramic composites. I am the guest editor, and if you have suitable manuscripts, please feel free to contact me for submission

(1) Thank | 向宽处行

I applied for a master's degree in 2019, which was relatively easy. If the innovation is not too significant and the funding is sufficient, it is worth applying

(0) Thank | tb96553712

The submission cycle is 2 months. It is too expensive to exceed 20,000 CMY, and approval from the student council is required. The reviewer from the student council told me not to submit to this journal again next time, which is embarrassing

(0) Thank | 有风度有态度

8-10 Submission Received
8-21 Minor Revisions
8-24 Manuscript Resubmitted
8-28 Accepted for Publication

(0) Thank | 定量原位原子尺度

11.06 submission recorded

(17) Thank | MV_Master

Submitted by the end of July, received the first round of three reviews with revision suggestions by the end of August. 
Revised version uploaded on September 11. 
Second round of review approved; subsequently reviewed and edited by the editorial team, followed by English revision. 
Accepted by the end of September, with invoice prepared for remittance. 
Successful remittance in early October, published online. Hard work pays off. 
P.S.: The publication fee has surprisingly increased from 1800 CNY to 2600 CNY, exceeding 20,000 CNY. It is considered relatively expensive in the OA publication fees. 
Only the remitter is responsible for all transaction fees, so overseas bank remittance can only be done at the counter. Online banking and apps only support sharing of transaction fees

(5) Thank | 有风度有态度

2023.7.11 Receive

(0) Thank | 张先生125

The text translates to: "Since June 23, 2023, it has been under review. I heard that this journal is fast, I hope so."

(0) Thank | 张先生125

How did you know that this is the reason for rejecting the review? Anyway, I couldn't find any peers in its database. I randomly selected it, but later the editor found someone, who can also be considered a peer, although not a close one.

(0) Thank | hxn1

The first review was given to three expert reviewers. Two of them had no comments, but the other one provided a lot of feedback, mentioning every aspect. I copied it down in Word, which resulted in four pages. I am a little worried.

(0) Thank | Bjut多

Pretty fast, and the reviewers are not too strict.

(0) Thank | linkle

May I ask how you resolved this issue? I have encountered the same problem and the editor hasn't responded to emails either.

(0) Thank | qqrwbyb

I have been rejected twice for not selecting peer review during the submission process. Does this mean they are dissatisfied with my article?

(0) Thank | GAO启强

Hello, I have submitted this journal twice, but both times it was rejected due to not selecting peer review. Should peer review be chosen during the submission process for general manuscripts?

(0) Thank | GAO启强

20221215 Submission
20221216 Under review
20230104 Major revision after the first review; Expert 1 made major revisions, Expert 2 made minor revisions.
20230115 Revised after the first review
20230117 Expert 1 approved, Expert 2 did not submit for review.
20230118 Awaiting final review by the academic editor
20230122 Accepted
20230123~24 English and formatting revisions
20230125 Proofreading
20230126 Published

(1) Thank | hxn1