Review speed: 1.0 Experience sharing: The editor is very good and the review process is very fast, rejected in less than a week.

(0) Thank | 一吃就胖小梦鑫

Submission Acceptance Rate: 25.0
Experience Sharing: The current acceptance rate at JNM is relatively low (ie, less than 18% for original articles

(0) Thank | 天神院巧青

If the method is being described for the first time, detailed explanation is necessary. A thorough explanation demonstrates the rigor and thoughtfulness of the research work; however, if the method has already been described in a previously published paper, a brief description and reference can suffice

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Briefly describe the method, include references

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How much can the method be abbreviated?

(0) Thank | 平原文波

When should the method section be detailed and when can it be abbreviated?

(0) Thank | Oswald Edie

There are a lot of emotions, I suggest not to submit during sensitive political periods. The submission website is always inaccessible, more troublesome than other magazines. After the first review two months later, there is a major revision requiring 60 days to revise, the feedback is quite fair, adding experiments as required, but there is not enough time to extend the revision period, when writing to the magazine, the THAAD incident happened, after sending three emails, there was no response, so I gave up submitting

(0) Thank | 北陆安吉

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: From submission to acceptance in less than a month, I thought I was very serious. When the review came back, I found many spelling errors, but I still think the direction of my writing and grammar are fine. I need to reflect on myself. The reviewer's questions were not tricky, and there were no questions about the experimental design, etc. I suggest that everyone carefully check spelling, grammar, and statistical methods before submitting

(0) Thank | 凌霄冉冉