1. The review speed was slow, but the review process was very transparent. You can see every step of the way, such as whether an editor is found, whether a reviewer is found, when the reviewer submits the results, and so on. Unlike other journals, it's just like a black box. You know nothing after you submit it. You can only see a few simple steps. 2. Journal reviewers and editors were very serious. They not only asked academic questions, but also modified the English expression in details. Sometimes the language habits of the reviewers were different and they changed back and forth. 3. There were 2 to 4 reviewers. 4. If the manuscript can enter the Discussion stage, the possibility of acceptance was still quite large. Of course, there were many articles rejected at the stage. 5. Compared to some US journals, the publication fee was not high. 6. It is not recommended to submit to this journal in order to meet the graduation requirements. On the one hand, the review cycle is long (according to their rules, the fastest review circle is 4 months). On the other hand, there is a risk of rejection at the Discussion stage.

(4) Thank | 海风吹向你

A great journal in the field of atmospheric sciences, with a lot of attention! Manuscript submission is divided into two stages. First, Quick report, which takes 1–2 months, and discussion after passing the Quick report; then anonymous review and public review. The number of reviewers ranged from 2–4. I met 4 reviewers the first time I submitted a manuscript. It was miserable. It finally went through 2 major revisions and 1 minor revision, then got accepted!

(14) Thank | 大气环境遥感

It is a journal with high attention. Language is very, very important. The content will not be persuasive and acceptable if it is written in broken English, and those written in fluent English will be persuasive and mild comments will be made. Fortunately, the boss's research English was strong enough that all the four reviewers gave minor revision.

(1) Thank | 2/3 Observer

Our article was finally published in ACP. It was not a straightforward submission experience, that’s for sure. It was very time-consuming; the reviewers requested that a lot of content be intricately explained. ACP also charges a lot of layout fees, and recently increased their service fee for retouching.

(5) Thank | Anonymous

18 Aug 2022 Registered
18 Aug 2022 File upload
18 Aug 2022 iThenticate.com Similarity Report completed: similarities negligible / not found
18 Aug 2022 Uploaded files validated
18 Aug 2022 Editor call first choice
18 Aug 2022 Editor found
18 Aug 2022 Editor initial decision: Access review with quick reports from referees
18 Aug 2022 Referee nomination & report request started
07 Oct 2022 Editor decision: Start review and discussion

Translation:

18 Aug 2022 Registered
18 Aug 2022 File upload
18 Aug 2022 iThenticate.com Similarity Report completed: similarities negligible / not found
18 Aug 2022 Uploaded files validated
18 Aug 2022 Editor call first choice
18 Aug 2022 Editor found
18 Aug 2022 Editor initial decision: Access review with quick reports from referees
18 Aug 2022 Referee nomination & report request started
07 Oct 2022 Editor decision: Start review and discussion

(0) Thank | Leon Kennedy

Each call to the editor has a deadline of 5 days. There is no second choice index terms filled out, so there is no editor call for second choice. The nomination deadline is 8 days, the quick report submission deadline is 12 days, and the discussion lasts for 40 days.

(0) Thank | navy0415

30 May 2022 Discussion started
Anonymous Referee #2 nominated on 14 May, accepted on 15 May, report on 27 May
Anonymous Referee #1 nominated on 05 May, accepted on 06 May, report on 19 May
05 May 2022 Access review with quick reports
26 Apr Editor found
23 Apr Editor called all editors
18 Apr Editor called first choice
18 Apr Uploaded files validated
18 Apr Similarity Report completed
14 Apr File upload
14 Apr 2022 Registered

(10) Thank | navy0415

Every time you call the editor, it takes 5 days.

(0) Thank | navy0415

May I ask what is your current situation? Are you available to add me on QQ? My QQ number is 305431456.

(0) Thank | 云朵奥

The self-quote has increased by nearly 29%, will I be kicked out?

(4) Thank | niu

The peer review process was very thorough. Three reviewers conducted three rounds of review, and the editor reviewed it once before it was sent for revision and once more before final acceptance. This journal has a great reputation and is a must for scholars in the atmospheric field.

(26) Thank | 风雨无阻+++

Unable to find someone to promote.

(0) Thank | 居酒屋

The processing speed is slightly slow, but the process is open and transparent, allowing you to see every step of the process.

(1) Thank | 居酒屋

Excuse me, do you have any updates? I am Editor assignment interrupted, but I haven't withdrawn my submission. I don't know what to do.

(0) Thank | Cissie

Continuation of the previous item: 
Editor Initial Decision: Start review and discussion after technical corrections (20 Jul 2021)
Editor assigned (15 Jul 2021)
Editor cancelled (15 Jul 2021) The editor missed the initial decision deadline; waiting for Executive Editor response
Editor assigned (09 Jul 2021)

(0) Thank | 风雨无阻+++

The allocation of the editor is a bit slow in speed, and the specific status is as follows. Currently, it is still in the D stage.

No Editor available (08 Jul 2021) waiting for Executive Editor response
Editor Call all Editors (03 Jul 2021)
Editor Call Second Choice (28 Jun 2021)
Editor Call First Choice (23 Jun 2021)
Uploaded Files validated (23 Jun 2021)
iThenticate.com Similarity Report completed (23 Jun 2021) similarities negligible / not found
File Upload (22 Jun 2021)
Registered (22 Jun 2021)

(151) Thank | 风雨无阻+++

has been acceptd after several twists and turns. Now in the proofreading stage, the editor puts an opinion on the website where the data I listed is added.I don't know what it means. I ask you if you have encountered a similar situation. How do you answer it?

(0) Thank | loda0519@163.com

The article was finally acceptd after a few twists and turns. Now in the proofreading stage, the editor puts an opinion on the site where the data I listed is located at add last access.I don't know what it means. I ask you if you have encountered a similar situation. How do you answer it?

(0) Thank | loda0519@163.com

The article was finally acceptd after a few twists and turns. Now in the proofreading stage, the editor puts an opinion on the site where the data I listed is on the add last access.I don't know what it means. I ask you if you have encountered a similar situation. How do you answer it?

(0) Thank | loda0519@163.com

The article was finally acceptd after a few twists and turns. Now in the proofreading stage, the editor puts an opinion on the site where the data I listed is on add last access.I don't know what it means. I ask you if you have encountered a similar situation. How do you answer it?

(0) Thank | loda0519@163.com

The article was finally acceptd after a few twists and turns. Now in the proofreading stage, the editor puts an opinion on the site where the data I listed is on the add last access.I don't know what it means. I ask you if you have encountered a similar situation. How do you answer it?

(0) Thank | loda0519@163.com

has selectd many times, the previous favorite.Unfortunately, the review is too slow now.The deadline for the reviewer is not mandatory, so it doesn't matter if you drag it.Now many reviewers are doing this

(0) Thank | Anonymous

JournalThe editor was very serious and gave a lot of specific comments.After the revision, the overall quality of the article has improved a lot.The review period is very long.

(1) Thank | xf

Atmospheric field top publication.Luck is better, the research done on the editor's taste, it took only two months from the time of receiving and receiving, but this is the best article I think I have written so far, the experiment is clever, the data is reliable,The results are also very interesting.

(0) Thank | doctormodiser

has been undergoing two overhauls and minor repairs from submission to reception for the entire 8 months.The two overhauls were proposed by a reviewer, and the three minor repairs were proposed by the editor.The editor is very patient and an expert in the field.

(1) Thank | Anonymous