By 2019.04.14, real time impact factor: JMCA=11.590 rise: 0.80, CM=9.800 rise: −0.359, ACS Energy Letters=19.800 mixed: 3.469, CEJ=10.810 rise: 2.455, Nano Research=8.330 rise: −0.815 ACS AMI=8.990 rise: 0.534, JPS=8.430 rise: 0.963, JEC=7.180 rise: 2.018, JMST=6.050 rise: 1.010, EA=6.330 rise: 0.947, Nanoscale=7.070 rise: 0.100, CC=6.150 rise: −0.014, JPCC=4.260 rise: −0.049, Applied Surface Science=6.280 rise: 1.125

(10) Thank | 匿名0

As of 2020.3.10, the real-time impact factor of this journal in 2019 is: 2480/340=7.2941. The impact factor of last year was released in June each year. Until now, what should be included in 2019 is almost included, and it is expected to be about 7.3. The growth rate of (the impact factor of) this journal is good. The impact factor of domestic journals has risen sharply, and the scores risen are basically over 2. The impact factor of Nano-Micro Letters in 2018 was 19.0, and the immediate impact factor in 2019 was already 13. If you don't believe it, you can calculate it yourself. If your articles are not very good, then it is more cost-effective to submit articles to domestic journals during this period.

(1) Thank | penguin

Congratulations on JEC's promotion to Q1. By December 22, 2019, real-time impact factor: JEC=6.8, JMCA=11.8, CEJ=10.44, EA=6.05, Nanoscale=6.13, AMI=8.41, JPS=7.9, nano research=7.81, energy storage materials=15.86, CC=5.73, ACS energy letters=17.64, AEM=23.51, materials today energy=5.43.

(25) Thank | penguin

The review comments all clearly say that our idea is novel but just needs more evidence support. We demonstrated better phenomena, but then it is not our fault that there are no better ways for characterization. Even worse, not long after we find that an article centered on our idea is published in a higher-tiered journal. Sad. I think the journal rejected our paper unfairly.

(13) Thank | 18306481980@163.com

4.29 Submitted in the evening
5.1 With editor, editor invited, with editor
5.2 Under review
5.4 RRC, major revision, two reviewers, 11 comments
5.5 Resubmission
5.6 Returned for formatting changes, uploaded copyright transfer
5.7 Accepted in the morning
The fastest submission experience, only took seven days from start to finish
Thanks to the editor for efficiently handling the work on the holiday of May 1st, and the formatting editor also responded quickly to emails. Hoping for further development of JEC.

(1) Thank | macronanosmall

4.3 WE

(0) Thank | SCI_zhang

4.23 WE

(0) Thank | SCI_zhang

4.22 stj is translated as "April 22nd" in English.

(0) Thank | SCI_zhang

The editors of this journal are all Chinese, and they are all well-versed in the Chinese community.

(0) Thank | WLXCEO

All the editors are Chinese, what do you think?

(0) Thank | WLXCEO

ACS Nano rejected after revision, so I submitted it to this journal without even looking at it. I feel that it is difficult to evaluate domestic journals, especially after the new classification came out, the feeling is even stronger.

(0) Thank | 祎祎

I will need the text that you want me to translate into English.

(0) Thank | WLXCEO

3.22 DIP translates to "3.22倾斜" in English.

(0) Thank | WLXCEO

3.20 stj
3.21 we

翻译为：

3.20 stj
3.21 we

(0) Thank | WLXCEO

3.7 stj
3.8 we
3.11 ei
3.12 we
Hope for a good outcome.

(0) Thank | 刀客塔9029

The speed is actually fine, I went out for some exchanges and wrote a long paper halfway through.

(1) Thank | if奖

The first review gave major revisions, and after the revisions, 2 were accepted and 1 was rejected (no specific comments, just said the overall lack of innovation). The version submitted for review is the final revised version.

(0) Thank | 半颗糖

On March 7th, I received an edit request to modify the image format according to the template. I replied with the modifications on March 8th. How long will it take to receive and obtain the DOI number? The deadline for the Young Fund application is approaching, and I also want to include the article in the Fund's representative works. Seeking help from all friends.

(0) Thank | 方形西瓜汁

Have the comments from the review been addressed? Did you submit it without making any changes?

(0) Thank | yangbobobo

Efficiency at maximum capacity, everyone please support domestic journals! 

2025.02.07 Submitted to Journal 
2025.02.08 Under Review
2025.02.11 Required Reviews Completed
2025.02.13 Minor Revision
2025.02.18 Revision Submitted to Journal
2025.02.19 Accepted

One review, a previous submission to Advanced Materials for revision was rejected, submitted with feedback to JEC, and was accepted in just 12 days. Please support leading domestic journals. 
First submission from personal account (小卡拉米).

(0) Thank | 半颗糖

Submit fast. Reject fast. No one delays, very efficient. 
02.10 Submitted to Journal; With Editor
02.11 Reject

(0) Thank | SAIJINWANG

I have both of these, but in terms of the quality of my articles, I believe JEC has higher requirements for submissions.

(0) Thank | 小楚tx

2025.1.8 submitted to journal
2025.1.11 under review
2025.1.15 rrc
2025.1.19 major Revision
2025.1.24 revision submitted to journal
2025.1.26 rrc
2025.1.27 Accept

Small research group, no big shot correspondence, journal only looks at the quality of the manuscript, double-blind review, very detailed, thank you Professor Zhang Qiang, the processing speed is really fast.

(0) Thank | 三井

We are also a small research group and this is our first submission. We have already submitted 5 times before, but none have been sent for review. The quality of the journal is still relatively high.

(0) Thank | ztt

Thank you Professor Zhang Qiang for handling it so quickly.

(0) Thank | ztt