Maybe because this is an inter-disciplinary journal, not many people have noticed this journal. Although it is not a high-tiered journal, the reviewers were very good and gave me very thorough comments.

(3) Thank | POP

The review process is quite fast.

(0) Thank | shmily_ld

The review speed is acceptable.

(0) Thank | shmily_ld

2025.2.12: Submission

2025.2.14: Editor Assigned

2025.2.19: Reviewers Assigned

2025.2.19: Under Review

2025.3.06: Reviewers Assigned

2025.3.11: Under Review

2025.3.11: Reviews Completed

2025.3.11: Editor Assigned

2025.3.13: Major revision

2025.4.05: Revision Submitted

2025.4.05: Editor Assigned

2025.4.07: Under Review

2025.4.28: Reviews Completed

2025.4.30: Accepted But Needs Final Editing

2025.5.7: Revision Submitted

2025.5.8: Editor Assigned

2025.5.11: Accept

(1) Thank | shmily_ld

Is there only one reviewer's opinion for this month's review?

(0) Thank | 红中lucky

How long have you invited the reviewers for?

(0) Thank | 红中lucky

May I ask how long it took to find the reviewers? After being under review for a month, I was invited to find reviewers again, but it's been almost a month and I still haven't received any invitations. I'm not sure what the current situation is, and I'm afraid to rush them.

(0) Thank | 红中lucky

Can I ask how long the overall process usually takes? Will the review process for this journal be lengthy?

(0) Thank | 红中lucky

Finally accepted, it went quite smoothly.

(0) Thank | Janko

Which template are you using? The one I downloaded from the guide is single-column, but I noticed that the published ones are all double-column. Can you provide a link to the template?

(0) Thank | 阿狸糕吧

The review process is acceptable, with feedback usually returned to the authors within about a month. However, it takes longer for reviewers to actually review the manuscript due to multiple rounds of revisions, which can take several months. The second review is usually much quicker, taking less than a month. It takes approximately one month from acceptance to publication.

(0) Thank | dumh

How long did it take for your second review?

(0) Thank | Janko

How long is the specific duration of your second review?

(0) Thank | Janko

May I ask how long the specific duration of the second review of your paper is, approximately?

(0) Thank | Janko

How long did it take for you to review the second time?

(0) Thank | Janko

Reminded three times, no response

(0) Thank | lvvvvv123

Have you ever followed up with the editor, and if so, how did they reply?

(0) Thank | ywzywz

Been reviewing the assigned work for over two months now, but it has been withdrawn

(0) Thank | lvvvvv123

It’s been two months and the reviewers are still not assigned

(0) Thank | lvvvvv123

Is reviews completed already finished? It has been reviews completed for 10 days, is it going to be rejected?

(2) Thank | Janko

Can any senior scholars who have submitted before tell me how long it takes for the first review? Will the reviewers be given a deadline for the review?

(0) Thank | ywzywz

Why did you publish the comment on April 16th when the editor assigned it on April 20th?

(1) Thank | pl_w

The submission made on April 3 is still being revised for formatting, with strict requirements, but each time the feedback received is quite vague.
Editor Assigned on April 20
Rejected on May 1
Emm's rejection was quite fast

(0) Thank | Yinny

2022/11/2 submitted
2022/11/13 under review
2022/12/12 reject
The reviewer provided detailed comments on the review. The review process took one month, which was relatively fast, although the submission was ultimately rejected.

(0) Thank | 贺行风

The review process is quite long, taking nearly 9 months from submission to acceptance, which involved two rounds of revisions. Of course, I also have a tendency to procrastinate and only submitted the paper on the deadline day. Secondly, the reviewers' comments were very objective, and the revisions included a lot of experimental content and data, making the article more persuasive.

(0) Thank | ttttttttttttt