Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | Geotechnique Letters | ||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | GEOTECH LETT | ||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 2049-825X | ||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 2045-2543 | ||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 5.40% | ||||||||||||||||||||
期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | http://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/toc/jgele/current | ||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | https://www.editorialmanager.com/GLETT | ||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | INST CIVIL ENGINEERS, 1 GREAT GEORGE ST, WESTMINISTER, ENGLAND, SW 1P 3AA | ||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL | ||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | ENGLAND | ||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | |||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 0 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 32 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||||||
OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||||||
WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=2049-825X%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: | ||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on Geotechnique Letters: | Write a review |
Author: strawdolly Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-06-04 17:10:30 Judging from the published articles, it took 3 to 4 months for the open access articles, and about 6 months for non-open access articles. ![]() ![]() |
Author: QianTutu Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-11-12 10:27:39 This journal is really slow, it took a month to review. Another two months passed, the editor-in-chief rejected my submission without sending an email, and I'm not clear on the reasons for the rejection. Beware, low publication volume and such a hassle. ![]() ![]() |
Author: zd678 Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2023-03-14 14:16:46 May I ask if it is easy to submit to this journal? How is the review period? Is it difficult or not? ![]() ![]() |
Author: Kinao Subject Area: Geoscience Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2022-10-03 14:52:13 The first SCI paper in life, the journal will definitely provide reviewers' comments within 2 months. Submitted on May 3, 2022. Major revision on June 30, 2022. Revised on August 18, 2022. Accepted directly on September 28, 2022. Since it is mainly a short article, it can also be submitted with relatively less content. ![]() ![]() |
Author: akk Subject Area: Engineering and Materials Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-01-06 08:08:19 Both reviewers gave their comments. One of them was very negative and gave undoable comments and rejected it after deatiled major revision. Problem is the editors do not pass on to the third reviewer even if one of the reviewers is positive. They only communicated negative revier's comments. Comparing to its impact factor journal seems very brutal ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page |