Although it is ranked Q4, this is a long-standing journal and the review is rigorous. Editors and reviewers were very responsible. Accepted after major revision.

(0) Thank | wenli.huang17@gmail.com

Have you experienced "out for review" when submitting your manuscript, or have you always been "with editor" during the external review process? I have been "with editor" for quite some time.

(0) Thank | 搞科研啦啦啦

What is the acceptable level of similarity for a journal to consider it as a duplicate?

(0) Thank | 楠木予安

2023.1.12   Submit
2023.1.16   Resubmit (double-blind, request to remove funding information)
2023.1.17   With Editor
2023.4.14   Reject

(0) Thank | SCI贴贴

Received a rejection message last night, and my heart sank. After six months of three rounds of revisions, the external review experts had no comments in the second round of feedback. The editor requested a third round of major revisions, but the result was still a rejection. I don't know if writing an appeal letter will be of any use. Sigh...

(0) Thank | Nikki

First submission, external review for 5 months, rejection. If you are pursuing speed in the future, be cautious when submitting to this journal.

(3) Thank | baie

The submission process is lengthy, and the editors enjoy rejecting submissions.

(0) Thank | baie

Submit a year and a half, overhaul 2 times, minor repair 1 time, receive

(0) Thank | 小天

5Submission in October, revised in October, revised draft again, one month toReplying to the comments, rejection of the draft

(0) Thank | ToviaTing