The journal adopts open review, author knows the specific name of the reviewer, and the review is relatively rigorous. Generally, there are reviewers. It is an open access journal, and the fee is high, $2290. The review speed was fast, the result came back in four weeks in the first round, and two weeks in the second round. It took seven weeks in total; it was accepted finally after major revision and minor revision.

(1) Thank | shouhuzhe

The review process was very fast, taking about a month for the initial submission. However, we were asked to make significant revisions, with a total of 16 comments from the two reviewers. After resubmitting the revised manuscript, it was rejected by the editor, who said the methodology was not acceptable. Why didn't they mention this during the initial review?

(0) Thank | zqyexa

Submitted:          2024-12-10
Editor Rejected:  2024-12-20

Reason:
manuscript does not align closely enough with the aims and scope.

Which i disagree, because it was completely same scope.

(0) Thank | Johnny G.

How long will it take to make the changes?

(0) Thank | 万花成娟

Review speed: 1.0 
Research focus: Image experience sharing 
Submitted on May 21, accepted on July 19, the only issue is the high cost, everything else is fine.

(0) Thank | 上清巧双

I initially invited 7 reviewers, but now it has turned into a technical review. What does this mean?

(0) Thank | 乌龙笑萱

Did you win, bro?

(0) Thank | 碧波海云

Nothing

(0) Thank | 碧波海云

I want to ask, I sent an email about a technical issue, but when I click on the webpage, I don't know where to make modifications. What should I do?

(0) Thank | 暗月寺采萱

Review speed: 3.0 Experience sharing: There has only been one reviewer for the second review, rejection after more than two months, only one out of four reviewers rejected, the others all agreed

(0) Thank | Anna Isabel

Are we allowed to recommend reviewers when submitting a manuscript?

(0) Thank | Rock North

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0
Emphasis on research direction: Imaging; Emphasis on sharing clinical experience: Submitted on January 12, revised on March 23, under peer review on April 24, major revision on April 30, revised on May 10, minor revision on May 11. The revision process has been quite lengthy, currently still under technical review. Hopefully the outcome will be positive

(0) Thank | 雅晗三岁啦

I am almost four months now and still no news

(0) Thank | 仲夏雨旋

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission hit rate: 5.0 Focus on research direction: Image experience sharing: It has been almost three months and there is still no news

(0) Thank | 红爱小娘子

Any news?

(0) Thank | 红爱小娘子

How long have you been investing?

(0) Thank | Xanthe McDonald

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: It's a long way off

(0) Thank | 流影冷梅

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: Using the Springer Nature platform, initially 4 reviewers, then 8, now 10, and still no review feedback received

(0) Thank | 流影冷梅

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 75.0
Sharing experience: Submission in January will be published in May

(0) Thank | 西行寺含蓉

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them as ":" and ":"

(0) Thank | 觅雁小娘子

Are you still accepting case reports now?

(0) Thank | 北陆萧曼

Submitted at the end of August in the 21st year, the reviewing process came back at the end of December. It required major revisions once and was reviewed by 3-5 individuals. After the revisions were made, it was accepted at the end of February in the 22nd year. It might have been delayed due to the impact of the pandemic; the reviewing process was slow.

(0) Thank | 韩仙俊

Review Speed: 6.0 | Submission Acceptance Rate: 75.0
Emphasis in Research Area: Clinical Cardiovascular Direction
Experience Sharing: The speed is relatively slow, submitted in August 2021, accepted by the end of February 2022, accepted after a major revision two months later, with 3-5 reviewers in the first review

(0) Thank | Orville Lincoln

Currently ORCID is optional, not mandatory. It is important to note that most publishers (including Elsevier, Wiley, Nature, Thomsen Reuters) now require all researchers associated with their publications to use an ORCID iD. 
19. How to add ORCID ID if it is not provided when an article is published?
ORCID stands for Open Researcher and Contributor ID. ORCID iD is a unique and persistent scholarly identity for authors, distinguishing them from other researchers and recording all of their relevant research activities. To add an ORCID iD after publication, you need to log into each author's account and link it in the account information settings

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Manuscript of the article

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德