The review speed is very fast and the editor is very dedicated. It was accepted the next day after the revision submitted, which was a pleasant surprise. 7.9 submitted; 7.25 major revisions; 8.12 resubmitting a revised manuscript; 8.13 accepted.

(2) Thank | Shan

Well, who can be in trouble like me? The manuscript was sent for external review for several times, but the reviewers refused to review. I was mad, and the editor was going crazy. However, the results were relatively good, the publication was very fast, and I successfully graduated in September. 2019.3.14, initial assessment; 2019.3.28, in peer review; 2019.4.26, with editorial office; 2019.5.11, in peer review; 2019.6.20, with editorial office (I sent email to the editor, and the editor told us that the reviewer refused to review the manuscript and a new reviewer will be found as soon as possible). 2019.6.25, in peer review; 2019.7.24, major revisions (revising text and figures (was required), no need to supplement experiment). 2019.7.31, the revision was submitted; 2019.8.2, in peer review. 2019.8.7, accepted.

(13) Thank | Adam Han

2019.1.23 Checking submission and files. 2019.1.24 Initial assessment. 2019.2.5 In peer review. 2019.2.17 Major revision. 2019.3.27 A revision has been submitted. 2019.3.28 Minor revision. 2019.4.10 Accept.

(6) Thank | 嘿嘿嘿嘿黑

The review speed at the RSC Database is very fast. At this journal, from submission to acceptance took about a month and a half. This submission went quite smoothly.

(2) Thank | showyyin@126.com

In general, the review process should be normal, with feedback provided within a month. The extended timeframe was mainly due to the fact that I spent a month and a half revising the manuscript myself, and also because the return of the revised manuscript coincided with Christmas and New Year, when the editorial department was likely on holiday, resulting in a longer acceptance time.

(0) Thank | jackie9527

2024.9.24 First draft
2024.9.25 Edit letter to improve the clarity of the text in the article images
2024.9.26 Re-edit images and send back
2024.11.2 Major revision
2024.12.17 Revision
2025.1.26 Acceptance

(0) Thank | jackie9527

The review process is too slow, it took four months to be accepted.

(0) Thank | Quan111

Revised for a month, it has been in the hands of the editor all along, and then resubmitted for review. A week later, it is still in the DIP status, and it has been like this for a week. I don't know what the outcome will be.

(0) Thank | sunnybitc

May I ask, who was the editor you chose at that time? My research is also on biomaterials, currently in the submission process and at the stage of choosing an editor. I would like to refer to your experience. Thank you

(0) Thank | klh

What does "Three times in peer review" mean?

(0) Thank | HANJIANGXUE

The speed is very fast. The immortal journal is estimated to still be in Zone 2 this year. Let's go for it, brothers.
10.22 submission
10.25 review
11.15 minor revisions
12.8 acceptance

(20) Thank | 1231465416

Rejecting the manuscript in just 4 days, very efficient, thank you!

(1) Thank | 居无何

Are you also requesting the original data?

(0) Thank | 眺望就是回想

From application to acceptance, it took two months.

(0) Thank | 赵子龙886

Transferred to this journal, the previous journal said that the editor of the BS journal had reviewed my article and considered publishing it in BS. So I transferred it, and then the article was delayed for a month with the associate editor. I sent an email to urge them, and they replied that it would be reviewed as soon as possible, but the next day it was rejected. Be cautious in submitting to journals that lack integrity!!!

(0) Thank | jin2468

The same day, they were also rejected. They were foreign editors who said it did not meet their journal's requirements.

(0) Thank | xk

4.28 Submission
5.2 Editing requires all WB data, to be submitted the next day.
5.9 Editing requires all original data, to be organized and submitted 3 days later.
5.17 Rejection: Your article focuses on pharmacological activity and therapeutic mechanism, which is outside the scope of Biomaterials Science.

(0) Thank | xk

12th submission, rejected on the 15th. Chose a foreign editor, who had a fast review speed. However, my article may not be in accordance with the requirements.

(0) Thank | 鲜柠不加糖

4.21submitted, it has been half a month and it is still in the "With Editor" status. This is too slow!

(0) Thank | 青青园中葵

Can you please specify which office it is?

(0) Thank | cjhom2016

Do I need to reply to the editor when urging for the task to be completed? Or should I silently upload it as soon as possible?

(0) Thank | datura

May I ask if the review process for the biodegradable materials direction is fast now?

(0) Thank | 鲜柠不加糖

It is a treasure journal, not a trash bin!!!!!!!!

(0) Thank | FANTEXI

How can a person who publishes two top journals in one year submit to a lower-tier journal?

(0) Thank | dfjlsnklf

How are the editors in the United Kingdom?

(0) Thank | dfjlsnklf