Junk journal AOM, junk editor Jipei Yuan. The manuscript has been delayed for more than 10 days without sending for review. The JCR impact factor was just released on June 29, and I was asked to transfer it to a sister journal 6:30 am. The journal is too much. At the end he didn’t forget to include a usual arrogant cliche of Wiley, "We hope that this decision will not discourage you from submitting your future work to us." Sorry, I will never submit to it for my life.

(149) Thank | X3748

The review speed is very fast. AOM has a very good reputation in the field of optics, and it has begun to gradually widen the gap with ACS Photonics. The impact factor is going to rise, which is estimated to be between 8–9, and it is expected to exceed 10 next year. The requirements for the integrity of the figures and work are very high. If the number of acceptances increases, the influence may be further increased.

(37) Thank | photonics

The three reviewers made their comments in almost 40 days. The first two reviewers recommended acceptance, the third raised a lot of minor concerns, and the editor required major revisions. After the revision, two reviewers reviewed the manuscript. It was accepted directly 10 days later. This year the IF of the journal got a bit gap with Optica. I hope that they could continue to control the quality of articles and catch up in the coming year!

(2) Thank | 藏地北辰

The reviewers were very fast; all four reviewers returned their comments in 10 days. One reviewer accepted the paper, two requested minor revisions, and the fourth reviewer requested major revision. The editor gave a decision of major revision. After our revision, it was sent to two reviewers. One accepted, but the other reviewer had more questions (because I refuted the reviewer's previous comments). After the second round of revision, the reviewer asked me to add the text of my rebuttal into the paper. We added that and it was accepted. Overall we revised three times. In general, AOM reviewers have high standards for the novelty of the paper. After all, the number of papers published each year is around 200, so there is no shortage of submission. Figures have to be superb. All Wiley journals have high standards for the figures. In the field of optics, I believe AOM and ACS Photonice will be better and better.

(3) Thank | 574690241@qq.com

Return revised manuscript on April 17th.

(0) Thank | 好发发发发

4.10 WE

(0) Thank | 好发发发发

Submitted on April 2, 2025.

(0) Thank | CHEN HUANG

请问你需要帮忙吗？

(0) Thank | CHEN HUANG

Please submit by March 11, 2025.

(0) Thank | 好事将至369

3.04 First review comments returned, all three reviewers suggested minor revisions, and the editor ultimately gave 20 days for major revisions.
3.10 Revised manuscript returned for comments.
3.18 Accepted.
A very pleasant submission experience, the reviewers' suggestions greatly improved the overall quality of the article. Thank you to the reviewers! Thank you to the editorial team!

(0) Thank | 好运来Oyeah

The article is about organic assembly materials.
Submitted on February 7, 2025
Under review on February 14, 2025.

(0) Thank | 好运来Oyeah

Submission on 22nd October 2024.
Reviewed on 25th October.
First review returned on 25th November, major revision required.
Revised manuscript submitted on 15th December.
Second review on 17th December.
Second review returned on 2nd January 2025, with two minor issues from one reviewer, minor revision required.
Revised manuscript submitted on 8th January.
Accepted on 10th January.

(0) Thank | SHENMINGYANG

Congratulations! How many reviewers have been assigned for your article?

(0) Thank | 打死不搞学术

11.27 received

(0) Thank | lalala985

10.24 submitted,
10.25 under review,
11.13 first round review feedback, major revision required
11.22 resubmitted for review
Awaiting results

(0) Thank | lalala985

After R1 responded, a reviewer raised a minor issue, which was promptly addressed by R2.

(0) Thank | L.L

Did OP receive R1's reply after replying?

(0) Thank | 溪落3

I have been invited to be on the cover, does anyone know how much the cover fee is approximately? The editor mentioned that the cover will be selected based on merits, so I feel the chances of being chosen are slim.

(0) Thank | L.L

The first review is quick (about one month), but the second review is slow (over a month), and the review speed depends on luck.

(0) Thank | L.L

Why haven't I received the "with editor" status yet for the submission I made on the 5th? Did the OP directly Ur it?

(0) Thank | Lity

The submission to Angew was rejected, and it is suggested to resubmit to AOM. The resubmission was made on September 5th, and there was communication with the editor on September 12th.

(1) Thank | 左登峰

How long does it take for the OP to submit for editing and review?

(0) Thank | Lity

May I ask what was the outcome later on?

(0) Thank | hengheng12

The suggestion of submitting to AM first is recommended to be redirected to AOM. Submitted on 6.25. Accepted for direct publication by the editor on 8.08. The process is a bit slow, and the publication has not been seen yet.

(0) Thank | Reco

5.6 submission, under review approximately three to five days later;
6.25 first round of comments returned, one reviewer suggested major revisions while the other likely recommended rejection, not many issues though, final editor gave three weeks for major revisions;
7.14 revision submitted, under review the next day;
7.30 second round of comments returned, both reviewers recommended acceptance, only one optional suggestion was made, editor still gave minor revisions;
8.1 second round of revisions submitted, editor sent back for reviewer confirmation;
8.2 third round of comments returned, reviewers had no issues, editor provided some formatting suggestions unrelated to the content, and pointed out a minor error;
8.4 third round of revisions submitted;
8.6 accepted; Thanks to the editors!

(0) Thank | miro