Journal Profile | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Journal Title | ASIAN JOURNAL OF CONTROL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Journal Title Abbreviations | ASIAN J CONTROL | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
ISSN | 1561-8625 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
E-ISSN | 1934-6093 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
h-index | 44 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
CiteScore |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | 40.00% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Official Website | http://www.ajc.org.tw/index.asp | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Online Manuscript Submission | http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/asjc | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open Access | No | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publisher | CHINESE AUTOMATIC CONTROL SOC, NATL CHIAO TUNG UNIV, DEPT ELECTRICAL & CONTROL ENG, TAIPEI, TAIWAN | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject Area | Engineering | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Country/Area of Publication | TAIWAN | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Publication Frequency | Quarterly | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year Publication Started | 1999 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Annual Article Volume | 270 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gold OA文章占比 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
OA期刊相关信息 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | Science Citation Index Expanded | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1561-8625%5BISSN%5D | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: About 4.8 month(s) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: Easy | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Useful Links |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. |
|
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last (To Page | |
Reviews on ASIAN JOURNAL OF CONTROL: | Write a review |
Author: Icevor Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-10-27 09:55:29 2020.06.29, submitted the manuscript (special issue on “analysis and control of complex cyber-physical networks”); 2020.08.31, major revisions; 2020.09.22, submitted the revised version; 2020.10.20, pending decision; 2020.10.27, accept. Generally speaking, it was still relatively quick, the expert met was in the same field as me. The comments were sharp, which pointed out the disadvantages of the article. After answering the three reviewers’ comments point-to-point, it was very fast. ![]() ![]() |
Author: superman Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-05-11 20:07:05 The first article of mine has just been accepted, and I am here to share my experience. General review: The review cycle is long, the editor is serious and responsible, and the review comments are quite pertinent. First review: 3 months. Reviewers: 3. A major revision was required, and there were 18 review comments. Second review: 2 months, and it got accepted. The manuscript was submitted in early December, the first review comments returned in mid-February, and accepted two months later (in early May), and it lasted 5 months in total. Generally speaking, the submission period is really long. If you are waiting for the article to graduate, don't submit to it, and don't take the risks yourself. It is relatively easy to be accepted in this journal. The editor-in-chief is Taiwanese, the reviewers are estimated to be mostly domestic, and the requirements for English are not very high. If your time is abundant, this Q3 journal is still worthy of submission. ![]() ![]() |
Author: SummerCastle Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2020-01-14 12:11:17 Process (year, month, day): 18.12.04 Submitted; 19.05.21 Major revision; 19.08.17 Revised and resubmitted; 19.09.30 Minor revision; 19.11.17 Revised and resubmitted; 19.12.13 Pending decision; 20.01.14 Accept. The initial review cycle is relatively long. This is the first article I submitted, but others have all been accepted, and it is still under review. It was indeed my personal reason that the preliminary revisions took a long time, because too many articles were revised at the same time. Three reviewers’ comments are relatively sufficient. The editor is very good, responsible and nice. But the pending decision took a month, and it may also be caught in the Christmas and New Year's Day. In general, the first review period is indeed relatively long as six months, and for other papers of mine, it was almost no more than three months. The ISA is the fastest. I reviewed three ISA articles and was asked to review them within one month. IJRNC is also fast; IJC is a bit slower, but normally within three months; IJCAS is slightly shorter than three months; for Automatica, it depends. But AJC is really slow. Maybe there are too many manuscripts. In short, the process is friendly, and if you are not in a hurry, it is a good choice. Hope it gets better. ![]() ![]() |
Author: Anonymous Subject Area: Information Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Write a review |
Reviewed 2013-11-20 13:41:00 A great aspect about this journal is that you can recommend reviewers to the editor. I recommended a few reviewers for my last submission, but I can’t say if the editor moved forward with my recommendations based on the reviewer’s comments. The review cycle can be long; the entire cycle is about a year and a half from submission to publication. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 朔N Subject Area: 计算机科学 Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-04-24 20:57:26 Which expert knows how long it generally takes for an editor to contact for additional submissions after being accepted? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 广武地 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-02-22 18:22:36 After submitting for a year, the review comments were all trivial and it took a long time to receive feedback after revisions. Submit with caution, if you still have three or four years before graduation, you can submit for fun, it's very slow. Looking forward to a good outcome. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 投稿次次都中 Subject Area: Chemical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-02-21 16:22:53 2025.2.10 submitted 2025.2.10 Under Review ![]() ![]() |
Author: xyq111 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-02-10 17:23:09 2023.11.15 Under Review 2024.8.30 First reminder, saying one reviewer's comments are not received 2024.10.12 Second reminder, no response 2024.10.18 Pending Recommendation 2024.11.5 Pending Decision 2024.11.6 Major Revision 2024.12.5 Revision (resubmission) 2024.12.5 Undergoing initial checking 2024.12.6 Under Review 2025.2.7 Pending Recommendation 2025.2.10 Pending Decision 2025.2.10 accept ![]() ![]() |
Author: continuezoz Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2025-02-04 16:06:00 2024.4.27 Submitted Approximately 2024.5 Under review 2025.2.4 Pending Recommendation Please handle with care. ![]() ![]() |
Author: LLLLLLL@ Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-12-16 11:47:49 Can you please explain why it changed from "pending recommendation" to "under review"? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 大佬捞一下啊 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-12-04 20:14:39 I took three months to submit the revised manuscript, and it took about a month for the external review to come back. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 大佬捞一下啊 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-12-04 20:12:58 The submission made in May was returned for revision once, with a three-month revision period given. The review process felt quite fast, possibly indicating that the direction of the submission was appropriate. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 光翟 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s) Result: Rejected Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-10-26 10:06:12 请问你能帮我翻译一下这段话吗? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 轩yq Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-09-10 23:48:12 Submitted on November 15, 2023, Under Review ........ Reminder sent on August 30, 2024, Under Review Received a reply on September 2, 2024, saying waiting for a reviewer's feedback Status remains Under Review as of now Has the first review taken this long? The status has not changed at all. ![]() ![]() |
Author: LLLLLLL@ Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-09-03 12:01:34 How long has it been since Pending Recommendation was used? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 小牛哥 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-08-22 22:24:32 Hey buddy, should the name in the charging form be the corresponding author or the school institution? Also, how should we fill in the PO and VAT numbers? ![]() ![]() |
Author: LLLLLLL@ Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-07-08 17:29:48 Attract good luck. ![]() ![]() |
Author: W,AX Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-07-04 20:30:52 The review process is relatively slow, taking anywhere from three months to six months for the initial review. ![]() ![]() |
Author: LLLLLLL@ Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-07-02 21:33:31 May I ask about the speed of the review process for this journal? ![]() ![]() |
Author: PP2746 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-07-01 16:25:23 Submitted in October 23, revision was given in February 24, and now it has been almost a month since the second review pending decision. When I messaged the editorial department after a week of pending decision, they replied that the chief editor may return with feedback in a few days. It has been almost 3 weeks now and there is still no response. Could it be that the chief editor is on vacation? ![]() ![]() |
Author: 大佬捞一下啊 Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-06-19 12:27:22 This is the fastest I have seen the review process so far. It has been over a month since I submitted it. I am hoping for some good luck and a quick acceptance. ![]() ![]() |
Author: 学术小包 Subject Area: Multidisciplinary Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-06-19 09:37:49 Why is this journal so slow!!! ![]() ![]() |
Author: GSM Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-04-02 20:02:36 It's been 4 months, the review process is too slow, I can't wait any longer. I submitted a withdrawal request today ![]() ![]() |
Author: zswzy Subject Area: Engineering Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-03-25 17:41:40 It usually takes about a week to go under review ![]() ![]() |
Author: 心之所往 Subject Area: Mathematical Science Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s) Result: Accepted after revision Write a review |
Reviewed 2024-03-18 11:16:05 Submission Date for your reference: 22Aug-2023 submit 23-Aug-2023 Under Review 27-Nov-2023 Pending Decision 10-Dec-2023 major revision 22-Jan-2023 submit 23-Jan-2024 Under Review 18-Mar-2024 Accept Reviewed by four reviewers, their comments were professional, revised accordingly in the second round, all accepted! Overall, the speed was average, but the journal is still good ![]() ![]() |
First Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next Last (To Page |