The situation is exactly the same as yours

(0) Thank | hualiuhua2005

Before under review, it was requested to submit all raw data including staining, PCR, WB, etc.
Feels like they didn't really want my article from the beginning, so they kept asking for raw data before under review, saying each time that what I submitted was inadequate. I made changes according to their requests twice, and even on the third response they still said it was inadequate and asked me to redo staining and WB for them. Forced to withdraw my submission. Sent an email to withdraw, got an immediate response, bitterly smiling, feels like they were just waiting for me to withdraw. This kind of torture is really frustrating

(0) Thank | sjyelva

How long does the state of reviwers assigned last?

(0) Thank | Debby Kelley

How long does the reviewer assigned status last?

(0) Thank | Debby Kelley

How long does the "Reviewers assigned" status usually last for? Thank you

(0) Thank | Debby Kelley

How long does the reviewers assigned status last?

(0) Thank | Debby Kelley

How long does the reviewers assigned status last?

(0) Thank | Debby Kelley

How long does the reviewers assigned status last?

(0) Thank | Debby Kelley

How many animals are in each group of your experimental setup?

(0) Thank | 五河铃语

Present the research results in the order of research questions and hypotheses, or structure the results according to the arrangement of research methods. Using the order of years and months as the arrangement order, arranging them by importance, or categorizing them according to different themes are all effective methods. When determining the structure of presenting research results, one must consider the readers, basis, and the most important research purposes

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Figures or charts must be numbered and arranged in the order they are mentioned in the paper

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

Which two graphs should be grouped together during the sorting process?

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

What kind of logical order should be followed when organizing the results?

(0) Thank | 八坂篷蔚

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission success rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: A good journal, submitted for review one week later, returned review comments one month later, added an experiment, and received acceptance in less than two weeks after revision. There may have been an issue with one of the reviewers, and a third reviewer was assigned after the revision. The editor is fair, serious, and responsible

(0) Thank | 东海溥心

Are there few animals? How many animals are in each group?
HaoLCAS 2015-07-17 10:11:00 Published: This journal is a publication of the BMC series, and both the submission and review systems are very good, and the efficiency is high. I have submitted one article before, and received the review comments in over 20 days. Although it was rejected, the editor said as long as we can answer the reviewers' questions, they still hope I can resubmit. The comments were very constructive, mainly because our way of presenting data was not reasonable and the number of animals was indeed small, so I didn't submit it again, and later published it in another journal. The review comments are still very helpful, and the review process is not too difficult, mainly because the number of articles published each year is too small, so it is a bit difficult

(0) Thank | 水月元基

Review Speed: 1.0 Experience Sharing: The review speed of this journal is considered fast, with the first review taking about 1 month, the second review after major revisions giving results in 20 days, and the second review after minor revisions giving results in about a week. The journal has a total of three editors-in-chief, and my submission was handled by one of the Japanese editors-in-chief, who was very nice. However, during the submission process, I encountered a very strict reviewer (out of a total of 3 reviewers), not sure if it was related to the editor-in-chief's recommendation. It took three rounds of answering questions from this reviewer before finally getting accepted, very difficult to deal with. The article took 5 months from submission to acceptance, going through major revisions, minor revisions, minor revisions, and acceptance

(0) Thank | Ingemar Hume

What is the status of the changes made downstairs? Has it always been editor assigned?

(0) Thank | Ingemar Hume

Submitted on November 16, 2018, the first review didn't come back until February 1, 2019. Revised on March 2, 2019, still no news until now. Feeling anxious

(0) Thank | Egbert Crichton

Review speed: 1.0 Experience sharing: The result of the first review was given after one month, which required major revisions. It has now been returned with the status "editor assigned." I would like to ask friends who have previously submitted to this journal, if the journal generally sends the manuscript out for external review again?

(0) Thank | Ingemar Hume

As mentioned below, I submitted my article and received the reviewer's comments a month later. The reviewer was very professional and raised many questions, making me feel like they were a colleague. This journal does not accept many articles each year, so it is still quite challenging

(0) Thank | 宗室笑卉

Review speed: 1.0 | Submission success rate: 25.0
Experience sharing: This journal is part of the BMC series, and both the submission and review systems are excellent with high efficiency. I submitted an article once, and received review comments in just over 20 days. Although it was rejected, the editor said that as long as we could answer the reviewer's questions, they still hoped for a resubmission. The comments were very constructive, mainly pointing out that our data presentation was not reasonable and the number of animals used was too low. I decided not to resubmit and instead published in another journal. Review comments were helpful, and the review process was not too difficult. The main challenge is the limited number of articles published each year, making it somewhat challenging

(0) Thank | 会心霞辉