The manuscript was submitted the year before last. And it was finally accepted. It was revised for several rounds. I graduated with a master's degree and am now a doctor; I am exhausted inside. Don't submit to this journal if you don't have to; all the authors of the articles published in this journal have relationships with the editors of this journal. The publication cycle of this journal is very slow. I estimated that my article will be published next year. The articles are likely to be rejected after minor revision by this journal. There are personal comments from the journal in the comments. After reading all the comments, what ghost (there are many people disagreed with him because he told the truth, poor piggy boy, vvlocus and zyl said were relatively reliable, all of which were truth. Because of this journal, all the articles of my supervisor will never be submitted to this journal in the future, and the academic level of this journal’s chief editor of management and editors is inferior to the masters of my supervisor (my superior said that; he has met them). This journal has no future at all. In less than half a year, an expert, as the corresponding author, has 14 articles on spodoptera frugiperda published in this journal. This journal also advertised on official account every day, becoming a super joke in the whole agronomy discipline. Therefore, you’d better not submit to this journal. The academic reputation of this journal was extremely bad, and your article won’t be accepted.

(60) Thank | efficientnet

I’ve published articles in 7 top journals and 2 nature sub-journals. If it was not a request from my supervisor to publish in a domestic journal, I will definitely not submit to this journal. There is nothing to say about the reputation of this journal. It is a stain on my life to submit to this journal. I will never admit that I have submitted to this journal in the future. Countless times I want to withdraw the manuscript. This will be the first and the last time I submit to a domestic journal. The first time I saw a journal with less than 300 articles in a year published a special issue. A top team in the world published 14 articles in less than a year with the same expert as the corresponding author. On average, each article was published in less than 3 months from submission to publication. Each article has 3 figures and 2 tables on average. Our group is a world-class team, and the quality of papers far exceeds the highest level of this journal. But it takes a lot of time. The editor of this journal lacks professionalism, only plays word game and, let you revise the manuscript repeatedly. The journal will deliberately delay your time, after all, there are many experts from top teams. My submission process: submitted in November 2019; major revision in February 2020; minor revision in April 2020; minor revision in June 2020; after that, it continued to be delayed; Awaiting DIR Recommendation in August 2020. If you are in a hurry to graduate or value your reputation, or want to go abroad or your paper did not exceed the quality of a Q2 journal, you’d better not to submit to this journal. Even the quality of the articles published here are of a Q4 level for international SCI journals, you can only submit to this journal when your article has not reached Q1. The average time is about 6 months. In addition, this journal is in danger of being excluded from SCI. You’d be careful!

(93) Thank | ghost

Sorry, I can't help but come here to complain about this journal. The review is really too slow. It took 3 months for the first review. I can’t wait to call the managing editor. The managing editor said that the review is over, but they must show it to the editor-in-chief. At that time, the system status was Awaiting reviewer. I don’t know if it’s wrongly spelt. Then the managing editor told me that the Section Editor-in-Chief hadn’t review it yet, and I may need to wait because he was very busy. After less than a second, the managing editor said, “Forget it. I’ll send you the comments. You can make the revisions first”. And then I started revising immediately. By the way, they let me make a major revision. After revising for less than 20 days, I quickly submitted it. Then I start waiting for the second review. It was sent to one of the reviewers of the first review. I waited and waited… After more than three months, it hadn't got reviewed yet. I just wanted to say, come on, will you hurry up? Now it can be considered as the end of the review, and it had been handling by the Section Editor-in-Chief. It has been held there for almost two weeks but no news yet. The impact factor of this journal is only less than 1. How can it be that a year was needed for reviewing the manuscript? I would not be surprised if it was closed. I just wish this rubbish journal be closed down soon, and I will never submit to it again. Suggest everyone not to submit.

(21) Thank | zyl

Submitted in mid-May, got the decision of major revision after a little more than a month. The second round of review was done by a different reviewer for rereview, and the comments were much fewer than the first round. Then I was asked to do minor revisions. Accepted in early November, and officially published in April the next year. Some delay during the revision stage was due to my own reasons, and the status of editor final decision lasted for more than a month. This is the first time I submit to an SCI journal. I feel as long as the topic fits the scope of the journal, it’s not so difficult. The big drawback is that this journal recommends a language editing company. I think their editing wasn’t that good, so after I got their edited paper back, I had to selectively accept their changes.

(2) Thank | 小李

I am Wang Ning, a teacher from the Agricultural Science Institute. It feels so slow! Thank you for asking about the emails I sent these few days.

(0) Thank | 123wo

My ME is Teacher Sun Lujun, but it has been almost a month since I entered the SE stage. The submission was transferred to SE for processing the next day, and I have been waiting for SE processing ever since.

(0) Thank | 轻度失心疯

ME is Teacher Sun Lujun from the Academy of Agricultural Sciences. She processes manuscripts very professionally and quickly. Your manuscript has been in the ME processing stage for so long without any updates. Why not send an email to inquire about it?

(0) Thank | 大家通通好运

Awaiting me to make a recommendation, it's been about 2 months, and there has been no progress.

(0) Thank | 123wo

What is the meaning of "Awaiting me make recommend 2 months"? Does anyone know what this is about?

(0) Thank | 123wo

Hey man, how are you doing now?

(0) Thank | 轻度失心疯

The day after I submitted my manuscript, it was transferred to ME for processing, and on the third day, it was processed by SE. It has been more than half a month since then and it is still being processed by SE. What's going on?

(0) Thank | 轻度失心疯

3.4 订阅期刊
3.19 等待编辑处理
3.21 等待审稿人选择

(0) Thank | Ccc

What is the background of this journal? It performs averagely but is as stable as Mount Tai in one area?

(0) Thank | kkkk2

2025-4-7 sub to the journal
2025-4-10 Awaiting ME Processing
4-17 Awaiting SE Processing
4-28 Awaiting reviewers selection

(0) Thank | laofu

It's been almost 10 days for me as well, and I am also waiting for the results.

(0) Thank | cebdgf

It has been 10 days since I have been awaiting the DIR recommendation. How long has it been since your status changed?

(0) Thank | 毛毛虫321

@Cyntiha: It might be because your topic is too niche, making it difficult to find reviewers; I had a similar experience with another article, where the first reviewer accepted and completed the review in less than a month, but it took a full two months to invite the second reviewer. It is still under review now. Editors are usually quite responsible, the main issue is finding suitable reviewers.

(0) Thank | No 89757

Classmate, I am the friend who just consulted you, but now I can't send messages. Can I add you as a friend?

(0) Thank | cebdgf

I have been in this state for over two months now. Do you have any contact with the editorial department?

(0) Thank | Cyntiha

"awaiting reviewers assignment has been ongoing for over two months, with no response yet."

(0) Thank | Cyntiha

Submission (2024.12)
Awaiting Me Processing
Awaiting reviewers selection
Awaiting reviewers assignment (This status has been since 2025.2, but there has been no progress so far)

(0) Thank | Cyntiha

A revision has been submitted (returned in early February 2025)
Awaiting reviewers selection
Awaiting reviewers scores (around two weeks)
Awaiting ME Recommends After Reviewing (ME efficiency is very high)
Awaiting DIR Recommendation
Awaiting EIC Decision (20 days, please be patient, the editors are very responsible)
Awaiting ME Final Processing
Accept (March 19, 2025)

(0) Thank | No 89757

Submission (2024.11.13)
Awaiting ME Processing
awaiting reviewers selection
awaiting reviewers assignment
awaiting reviewers scores
awaiting ME Recommendation
Major Revision (2024.12.26)
a revision has been submitted
awaiting reviewers selection
awaiting reviewers assignment
awaiting reviewers scores
Major Revision (2025.01.27)

(0) Thank | No 89757

"Awaiting Reviewer Selection" is not an invitation to reviewers, is it?

(0) Thank | 土壤人~

Brother, it has been 10 days for me.

(0) Thank | 欢迎来草原放牛