The first review was 3 and a half months, major revision was required. It exceeded over one month for the supplementary experiment. I applied for an extension for revised submission a month later. The second review was 3 months and minor revisions were given. The cell experiment was supplemented, and it was submitted one month later. The third review lasted one and a half months. All reviewers had no problems. At this time, the editor said that it had duplication between the text description of the method part of the article and my previous article, and repetition rates need to be reduced. Then it took three weeks to carefully modify the language, check duplication twice, and then I returned it. The fourth review lasted 1 month. (I don’t know why it’s so slow). It was accepted! The manuscript was proofread 2 weeks later and published online another three weeks later. Generally speaking, it is quite difficult to be accepted, and the amount of data was so large that I was exhausted. Shortage: The journal's processing speed was too slow...

(14) Thank | princesun083

First review lasted for 3 and a half months. There were wo reviewers and major revisions were required. Second review lasted for 2 months and minor revisions were required. Third review lasted for 20 days and it was accepted in principle. After formatting for a week, it was published a month after acceptance. It took a total of eight months. The requirements were high. The review speed was slow. Anyway, it was accepted.

(9) Thank | xiaoxiaoxiaochi

One week with editor, may I ask if there is a good chance of being submitted for review?

(0) Thank | 苍风承福

May I ask what the final result is?

(0) Thank | 风神博明

The same situation, I don't know how it will turn out

(0) Thank | PICBer

If it takes more than 10 days, it is likely that the submission is under review in search of appropriate reviewers

(0) Thank | 风神博明

Usually within one month

(0) Thank | 风神博明

Could you please tell me if this journal accepts letters?

(0) Thank | 是韶丽吖

It has been 34 days since the submission was made, and there have been two Editorial Assessments. Is this normal?

(0) Thank | dec2024

Research Focus: Genomics
Experience Sharing: My paper has been in peer review for over 3 months now, and it has been in editor evaluation for 10 days. What are the chances of it being rejected?

(1) Thank | 深渊之芳

The editor is very nice. The first article underwent two rounds of minor revisions and was published after six months. The second article was rejected and required major revisions before resubmission. After resubmitting with major revisions for two months, it was accepted after five months of two additional rounds of minor revisions

(3) Thank | 2333333333

Hello, the calculation is the main theme. Are you mainly focused on bioinformatics analysis for this publication???

(0) Thank | sky

It's a good thing we're not in a rush, but if it takes so long for it to be under review, it would be awkward if we came back and got rejected

(0) Thank | Ingram Tuttle

Did the gentleman finally accept it?

(0) Thank | Ingram Tuttle

Editors generally take half a month to a month to decide whether to send a manuscript for review. However, once under review, it is common for manuscripts to be under review for up to six months. If you are in a hurry, submit with caution

(0) Thank | 是旭尧吖

How long does the Editorial Assessment of this magazine usually take?

(0) Thank | Ingram Tuttle

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Emphasized research direction: Plasmid conjugation transfer experience sharing: Initial review took one month, focusing on answering questions, no additional experiments were requested. Second review took over two months, followed up with emails twice, and the acceptance took a total of 4 months. The second submission was rejected within a week

(0) Thank | Gemma Albert

How long does Genome Medicine take to reject a submission?

(0) Thank | 龙鳞天泽

Introduction includes all or some of the following five items: introduction to the background of the research field, significance, current status (insufficient), purpose of the research, and a summary of the research content

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The content of the introduction is arranged into three to four levels to organize paragraphs

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What should be included in an introduction?

(0) Thank | 修然小公主

Introduction is generally divided into several paragraphs

(0) Thank | 破戒阳平

Did you go to the same place as me?

(0) Thank | 蒙德素真

Still under review for the 4th time

(0) Thank | 苍风华芝

Review speed: 6.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 25.0
Focus on research directions: gut microbiome
Experience sharing: Submitted at the end of December 2019, did not receive review comments until June 2020, changed editors once in between, reminded 3-4 times, and finally received a direct rejection from the editor. Review process was very slow and difficult to submit

(0) Thank | 泄矢谷梦