Everyone must be careful to submit the manuscript to the journal. Major revision was made twice, and every time the manuscript was submitted, the new reviewers were found by the editor. As a result, major revision was requested every time. In the end, maybe the editor though it was too troublesome, so he rejected it directly. It took up to 8 months.

(2) Thank | little white

Submission on April 21, revision on June 14th, accepted on July 17th.

(0) Thank | 风雨

It’s so slow. I haven't got any response for 7 months. It’s so, so slow. I’m dying waiting.

(3) Thank | wood camel

Submitted in mid-November last year and the review results came back in mid-January this year. Two reviewers, both suggested major revision. After the revision, the paper was accepted in March, went online at the end of April, and was published in May. Overall, the review process is efficient, and the reviewers were professional. The editor did not gave additional comments. The paper was accepted after I had addressed the reviewer comments. Now the impact factor is 1.8, in Q3, the “performance-price” ratio is high.

(2) Thank | qiyanleweng

Do you have a template, dear?

(0) Thank | prayhappy

Dear, do you have a template for crop paste?

(0) Thank | prayhappy

editing speed is very fast, the second submissionDays refused to submit, telling them that they need international interest, may not be interested in Chinese local research.

(0) Thank | siberianwind