DFT, computational chemistry, cluster and spectroscopy. 2020.6.16, submitted; 2020.6.19, with editor; 2020.7.25, the review comments were raised, and moderate revision was required; 2020.8.21, the review comments were replied; 2020.9.04, accepted. The efficiency of this journal is relatively high.

(0) Thank | zyzyzy

The manuscript was in quantitative calculation. There were two reviewers, one suggested accepting it directly, and the other one didn’t agree to accept it. The reviewer with negative attitude should be an expert, and the editor asked to make moderate revision. The revised manuscript was submitted after careful revision, and it was accepted the next day. It lasted 2 months.

(0) Thank | tbh

My paper is in the field of dft calculation.2017.4.20 Submit; 2017.6.07 review comments returned, one reviewer; 2017.6.30 Submitted after revision; 2017.7.01 accepted; 2017.7.08 The final version is online. Overall, it was quite efficient and the editor is friendly. The article was accepted on a weekend, and soon after that the page number was assigned, and then the final version was soon online.

(2) Thank | 244085334@qq.com

Feb 20, 2025 Submitted to Journal
Feb 25, 2025 With Editor
Feb 26, 2025 Under Review
Feb 28, 2025 Two reviewers provided feedback after waiting for two months, and a third reviewer agreed to review. The first two reviewers did not provide feedback in a timely manner, so the editor had to find another reviewer. What kind of operation is this? If you don't want to review, then don't accept the invitation. It's a waste of time.

(0) Thank | shudai7ye

2.1 Submission
3.12 Received minor revisions, both reviewers only requested citation of articles, so just cite them
4.7 Submitted the revised version
The editor did not even look at it before rejecting it after 7 days, citing that the experimental work is not suitable for this journal
The editor is Jun Li, PhD.

(1) Thank | sfoldss

It's over in just 6 days, too fast.

(0) Thank | sexttvbyb

Submitted for review, this journal has been resubmitted to the reviewers after revisions by both my colleague and me.

(0) Thank | 不想上学

Has the editor submitted the revised draft for review during the major revision?

(0) Thank | sexttvbyb

1.2 submit
1.12 with editor
3.8 major
3.14 accept
The speed feels okay, faster than another journal in the same field that I submitted to at the same time.

(0) Thank | 不想上学

The Conflict of Interest Form seems to be new, and I haven't been able to find it.

(0) Thank | 杨福安

In the submission interface, when you go to select a file, there is a description on the far left. You can click on it and fill out each section, and it will automatically generate for you. Many journals in Elsevier operate in this way.

(0) Thank | kali@@@

Hello, may I ask where I can find the Conflict of Interest Form? Thank you.

(0) Thank | shudai7ye

Hello, may I ask where I can find the Conflict of Interest Form? Thank you.

(0) Thank | shudai7ye

Does this require a publishing fee?

(0) Thank | 接收接收接收

Nov 27, 2024, submit
Dec 06, 2024, major revision
Dec 30, 2024, revision submit
Jan 06, 2025, accept

The review process was quite fast. I originally thought there would be minor revisions after the major revision, but I was pleasantly surprised to receive an acceptance notification directly. The editor's efficiency was really high and very friendly. Thank you to S. Jenkins for editing, and also a big thank you to Computational and Theoretical Chemistry journal for accepting my submission!

(0) Thank | 发不出论文睡不着

The speed is quite fast, thank you for the editing.

(0) Thank | 张文远

9.30 submit 
11.05 major
12.04 revision submit
12.16 minor
12.30 revision submit
2025. 1.02  accept
Overall, it took a little over three months, which is quite efficient. The first round of revisions was delayed because I took some time, otherwise it should have been faster. The editor was Dr. Jun Li, thank you to this editor.

(0) Thank | kali@@@

Very slow.

(0) Thank | WXTx

7.12 Submitted;
9.9 Received review comments, two reviewers, one suggests major revisions, the other says they can't find the PDF file of the manuscript (I replied: Thank you for reviewing for me, we have attached a PDF file of the manuscript, if you have any questions, I am willing to address them);
9.18 Revised submission;
10.7 Reviewer 1 agrees to accept directly, Reviewer 2 suddenly raises 7 questions, all of which are irrelevant, and suggests citing 4 of their articles (which are basically unrelated to the direction I took, but now I am at their mercy, do I dare not comply?);
10.11 Revised submission;
During this period, the manuscript remained in "with editor" status, it is speculated that the editor couldn't bear the questions raised by Reviewer 2 and deemed it unnecessary to send it back to this expert, "with editor" status lasted a total of 3 days;
10.14 Checked the status of the manuscript at 11 pm and it was accepted.
Overall, the process took a little over 3 months, the editor is Dr. Ana Martinez, thank you to this editor! Also, thank you to the Journal of Computational and Theoretical Chemistry!
(Urgently graduating, please do not submit for awards!)

(0) Thank | John117

Do all authors need to confirm after submission?

(0) Thank | 偶遇

I haven't invited a second reviewer in a long time. How are your results?

(0) Thank | 音音

The journal system can't send emails. It has been two months and there is still no invitation for the second reviewer. I can't even find the editor's email to inquire about it

(0) Thank | 千寻x

Submission successful, displayed as "submitted to journal."

(0) Thank | qingtong989

Does the magazine submission require confirmation from all authors before moving on to the next step? Thank you!

(0) Thank | qingtong989

Hello! Is the submission status showing as "submitted to journal" or "with editor"?

(0) Thank | 吴多鱼