It took about 5 months from submission to acceptance. It was accepted directly after major revisions. The review experts were very professional, and overall it was relatively smooth.

(3) Thank | heliang079

Submission time: July 21, 2019; Review time: 6 months. Though it was a long time, but I had never urged the editorial office. It was estimated that the editorial office also felt it had been delayed for too long, and finally returned a reviewer's opinion. Reviewers in the field of the use of computers across earth sciences were difficult to find. Understandable. Revision time: addressed the comments of the reviewers one by one and submitted it. A month later, I encountered COVID-19 epidemic. After I returned the revised manuscript, it was sent for review again, and the notification of acceptance was received over 20 days later. Completion time: April 3, 2020. It took 8 months in total.

(3) Thank | 地下核聚变

2017.11.14 Submission; 2018.3.28 Review comments returned, minor revision requested; 2018.4.13 Revised version submitted; 2018.4.14 Journal said that I only submitted the version with marked revision, and I had to submit a final version; 2018.4.15 Re-submitted; 2018.4.22 Accepted. Overall I feel the journal is all right. It is a bit slow because the editor spent a long time finding the reviewers. However, when I emailed the journal during the middle of the review process, the editor very patiently replied to me. This is my second SCI paper during my master program. I hope that the impact factor of this journal can go up.

(0) Thank | 瓜皮皮(huang_qiuping@126.com)

I also have only one reviewer available.

(0) Thank | 没阔以喊我

I only have one reviewer who agreed, I feel like I'm going to be rejected directly, but it's been a long time, it's so anxious.

(0) Thank | 既然4153

The reply stated that 20 reviewers were invited but none were willing to accept, so another 20 are currently awaiting responses.

(0) Thank | 没阔以喊我

I am also, it has been almost two and a half months, nearly three months, and still in peer review.

(1) Thank | 既然4153

It's been over two months, and no reviewers have been assigned. Emails have been sent but no one has replied.

(0) Thank | 没阔以喊我

Brothers and sisters who pass by, please leave your progress and time here. We are anxiously waiting, but there is no news at all.

(0) Thank | 既然4153

Why did an OA article with the exact same research direction as mine get published last year, while mine was desk rejected with the reason being out of scope for the journal???

(0) Thank | 曹秋

The post was made on December 19th, after six months since it was published on June 2nd.

(0) Thank | 无心心12

How are you, brother?

(0) Thank | 曹秋

Hello classmate, may I ask what's the situation now?

(0) Thank | Krystal

It's been a week since the technical inspection, what's going on... Is everyone this slow?

(0) Thank | Krystal

How is the latest progress of the OP? I'm preparing to submit a small paper on interdisciplinary computer applications to this journal. It feels like it's been a while, doesn't it?

(0) Thank | turbo_xiong

I conducted a technical review for four weeks, it was too difficult.

(0) Thank | 小熊333

How long has the technical review been? I haven't started for 15 days.

(0) Thank | MYES0622

Submitted on April 2nd, still under technical review on April 17th, it's too slow.

(0) Thank | MYES0622

I submitted on March 27th and finally got assigned to the editor on April 16th.

(0) Thank | wang76

The submission was made on March 23, and there was one technical review conducted during the process. After the rework, the technical review has been ongoing.

(0) Thank | 迪斯尼王子

Are you still in the technical review process?

(0) Thank | wang76

Which date did you submit your application? I submitted mine on March 27th and it is still under technical review.

(0) Thank | wang76

Why hasn't the technical review produced results after several weeks?

(0) Thank | baoming

The technical review has been two weeks already, it's really slow.

(0) Thank | 迪斯尼王子

The technical review has been conducted five times, and it has been two months. The technical review has not been passed, with different opinions raised each time. The same issue has received different opinions twice, driving me crazy.

(0) Thank | SCI是我的命