EGU's top journal in the field of geoscience model development. The review comments are professional and detailed.

(112) Thank | moony

It’s an article on carbon cycle atmospheric data assimilation. No reviewer was found for the first two months. It took two months to find reviewers, and two review results were returned in more than another two months. It was revised according to the opinions, and finally accepted and published. It went well. It took 10 months in total. Most of the journals in EGU are strict, and review comments are in-depth and detailed, and it takes some time to reply. As a top journal in the field model development, the impact factor has been rising. I am optimistic about this journal.

(8) Thank | njuhewei

This journal focuses on the development of geoscience models. It covers a wide range of topics, including hydrology, meteorology and oceanology. The reviewers are knowledgeable. I think thir impact factor will continue to rise.

(3) Thank | Herr.J

It is indeed too slow. It has been six months, and the first instance decision has not yet been returned.

(0) Thank | Norman Zheng

I have never seen a journal that moves so slowly. It's difficult to find reviewers, and even when we finally manage to invite them, they either decline or delay the review process, leading to re-invitations. The editorial process, from submission to decision, is also very slow (6 months of submission, and several months wasted waiting for the editor's decision). What can I say?

(0) Thank | 勒贝格积分

Now it is three districts

(0) Thank | mythology94

The first paper of the doctor, which developed a top journal pattern, unexpectedly was divided into two areas by the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Checked for JAMES as well, can only say that the Chinese Academy of Sciences is beyond reach

(25) Thank | cretaceous

My head hurts, and James has also changed to District 2

(10) Thank | mythology94

The GMD (Geoscientific Model Development) journal of EGU (European Geosciences Union) and JAMES (Journal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems) of AGU (American Geophysical Union) are both top journals in the field of geoscientific modeling. To prove oneself as a modeler, it may be necessary to publish representative works in these two journals. I have developed a forest carbon cycling model. It took one and a half months for the submission to enter open discussion, followed by a peer review process of 2.5 months. After major and minor revisions, the paper was finally accepted. The editors and peer reviewers were extremely professional and diligent, making it worthwhile to submit to these journals.

(18) Thank | lzugeo

This article focuses on which article, please tell

(1) Thank | cugGIS

How can this journal impact factor drop from 6 to 3.6

(0) Thank | yuanjiezhang@outlook.com