This journal is relatively professional, but it is estimated that the review cycle is relatively long; there are not many people who pay attention to it. It was accepted after two major revisions and two minor revisions. It took one year and three months in total. The final result was not bad.

(0) Thank | 853007793@qq.com

This journal is the best journal in wood science. Its impact factor has growth rapidly in recent years. Submitted papers need to be sufficiently novel, systematic and complete. Because there are few SCI journals in wood science, the journal gets many submissions, so they have high standards and the rejection rate is high. Generally the review turnaround time is one month, but sometimes it will be dragged to about four months, so it is critical to choose the right reviewers.

(3) Thank | Anonymous

Hello, I would like to inquire about the journal Wood Science and Technology. The official website recently shows that it is a hybrid journal, with both OA and non-OA models. I would like to know where to submit for each of these models. I would like to submit to the non-OA model, but I am a bit concerned about accidentally submitting to the OA model. The submission system also does not clearly specify how to differentiate between the two.

(0) Thank | 不及之后

Hello, may I ask how long it takes to receive a response from submission to editorial review or external review?

(0) Thank | Ys1119

Free of charge, relatively slow, in a hurry to graduate with a paper, look for other options.

(0) Thank | 香山路大宝

Hello, is there a fee for this journal?

(0) Thank | Ys1119

In the field of wood, the paper was submitted in early January, and feedback from two reviewers was received in mid-April. The reviewing process lasted for 14 days. In early May, feedback from three reviewers for the second round of review was received. The paper was accepted on May 10th. The first round of review was very slow, taking about 4 months, but the feedback was not very difficult

(0) Thank | CP Ye

Each major repair usually takes 3 months, while minor repairs take 2 months.

(0) Thank | 853007793@qq.com

Generally, the first review takes 3-4 months, while the second review is usually faster, taking 1-3 months. Usually, there is one major revision or one major revision and one minor revision before acceptance. There are 1-2 reviewers, and it typically takes 1 week, sometimes 2 weeks, to complete the review process.

(0) Thank | 莫问

Hello, how long will it take for you to receive news after your major renovation? Thank you.

(0) Thank | wood

Top journal in the field of wood, submitted in September 2021, after one major revision and one minor revision, it took 8 months to be successfully accepted. The editor was very nice and provided detailed modifications.

(1) Thank | 颂颂

Hello, how long did it take for the reviews to be completed and results delivered after you submitted them? Thank you.

(1) Thank | wood

The review speed is indeed a bit slow, but the influence of the journal in the field of forestry is still quite good. It is quickly returning to the TOP of the second tier. I hope the journal's development continues to improve.

(0) Thank | Jimmylee

Research on the energy attenuation of AE propagation in wood.
Submitted on January 18th, approximately one week later it was sent for external review.
Received reviewer comments in mid to late April (three reviewers, two major revisions, one rejection). The final decision was major revision, and the given time was relatively long.
Due to coinciding with my PhD interview, I didn't handle the revision until the deadline on June 30th (the editorial department also sent reminder emails during this period).
After another two to three weeks, the editor provided some suggestions on expression.
I returned the revised manuscript in July (actually, the emails were sent to my advisor, but he didn't check them).
On September 8th, the status changed to "ACCEPT".
Then, I was asked to proofread the manuscript online, and approximately two weeks later, it was published on Spring.
Overall, the initial review process took a long time, and the editor provided a response only after all three reviewers had given their feedback.
The revision process was relatively fast, but it was delayed for a long time until the deadline day.
The subsequent publication process was relatively fast.

(0) Thank | 不罚站的小明

The review process is extremely slow, it took a full 7 months from submission to acceptance.

(0) Thank | shl123

Review time is long, more rigorous

(0) Thank | Delin

timber professional journal,Very good, recognized by peer experts!

(10) Thank | 840400091@qq.com

13 December, submitted for review, 3 months later for reviewOpinions, overhaul twice, minor repairs and received last month.

(0) Thank | f1abc

submitted on July 20th, and received an editorial reply on November 28th requesting an overhaul. It was revised back in December 14 and is now in review.Feeling that the review speed was slow, the first trial took four months, and the results of the second trial had been repaired.

(1) Thank | hua

I selectd in January until August, when I gave a major repair and then returned to the end of October at the end of September.It may be that the direction of doing is relatively unpopular, so the reviewer is not easy to find a long time.

(5) Thank | mini

Journal Homepage URL: http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/wst

(0) Thank | Anonymous