Wukejxau19 on the 40th floor and other authors, after the manuscript was sent for review, an email was received saying “Waste Management has moved to Editorial Manager (EM), Elsevier's online submission and peer review tracking system. Your EES account information and complete submission history are now available in EM.” Is it a scam or is it real?

(2) Thank | 哦啊

5.6, submitted to journal; 5.11, submission sent back to author; 5.12, submitted to journal; 5.12, with editor; 5.17, editor invited; 5.20, under review; 6.6, under editor evaluation.

(5) Thank | wukejxau19

Submitted to journal on April 9th; the format was informed to be changed on April 10th. We revised the format the same day and resubmitted it. It became With Editor, and then Editor Invited. From April 18th to the current May 23rd, it has been Under Review. The result has been unknown. I hope there is good news.

(2) Thank | 无牙

20180203-Submitted to Journal/sent back to author20180204-with editor20180205-editor invited/with editor20180206-under review20180329-Under Editor Evaluation20180330-significant revision20180521-Revision Submitted to Journal20180522-Under Review20180616-Accept. The overall efficiency is high, the review time is about 1 month (I have a reviewer who did not return their comments for a long time, and that why the review was from February 6  to March 29.

(2) Thank | S3709

Very slow, submitted in February, reviewed in March, received comments in July, a total of 3 reviewers, 2 reviewers suggested minor revisions, 1 reviewer was in a hostile research field, or was a student reviewing for their supervisor, the review was not very serious, the comments were subjective, baseless, and meaningless, the editor directly rejected based on the negative comments, it is inexplicable.

(0) Thank | tongxxxxxx

This journal has stricter formatting requirements compared to others, with a turnaround time of around three months. After two rounds of revisions, major and minor, the manuscript was finally accepted after three rounds of peer review. The reviewers' comments were generally constructive, although some may have posed particularly challenging questions for those who are not well-versed in the subject matter.

(1) Thank | 汐夕

Did you submit it for review?

(0) Thank | dangligedang~

I'd like to ask how you set up the three-column reply in your table. After receiving the major revisions from the editor, I was also told to reply using a three-column table, but I didn't understand how to do it. Thanks for your response.

(0) Thank | suss

Did you submit it for review in the end?

(0) Thank | dangligedang~

I also became an editor invited several days after becoming part of WE.

(0) Thank | 接accept

Did you submit it for review in the end?

(0) Thank | dangligedang~

Did you submit it for review in the end?

(0) Thank | dangligedang~

Plastic recycling is of great interest to the editor. The submission was made on March 22nd and sent for review on April 3rd. During this period, six reviewers accepted the review. By May 18th, four reviewers had returned their review comments. The editor made major revisions and returned the comments on June 4th. The editor accepted the submission on July 1st.

(1) Thank | 音绣年华

Do we still not know the result? Has no one voted recently? The comment section is so empty.

(0) Thank | 接accept

The review process is extremely slow!!!! There are 4 reviewers in the first round of review, and 8 reviewers invited for the second round, and most of them just suggested minor revisions. However, the editor rejected it directly!!! What a waste of my time.

(1) Thank | AAA123y

Everything is great except for being a little slow!

(0) Thank | gloomysmile

Bring good luck, accept accept!!!

(0) Thank | 必中一区

May I ask how your submission turned out? Mine was also rejected after being with the editor.

(0) Thank | 追风筝的ren

Mar 21, 2024 Submit to journal
Mar 24, With Editor
Mar 29, Under Review (0/4)
Jun 27, Send Email
July 18, 0/11
Aug 25, 0/11
Aug 27, Send Email
Aug 29, 1/11
Sep 05, 1/13
Sep 09, 1/14
Sep 24, 1/18
Oct 04, 3/19
Oct 08, 1/3/19
Oct 12, 2/3/19
Oct 12, Major Revision
Nov 5, Revised
Nov 6, Under Review (0/2)
Nov 7, 1/2
Nov 13, Review Complete (2/2)
Nov 14, Decision in Process
Nov 16, 2024 Accept
The process was slow in the beginning, but sped up after reminders were sent. The result is good and acceptable! :)

(1) Thank | Bazen

I am too. May I ask how things are progressing on your end?

(0) Thank | Joeyu

What's going on if there is no manuscript number after submission?

(0) Thank | zanilia.x

Submission on March 21, 2024
Invited reviewers on March 29, 2024
No one reviewed, invited reviewers again on July 16, 2024
Still no one reviewed on July 30, 2024 :)
Papers submitted at the same time as mine have already gone through the second review.

(1) Thank | Bazen

Can dip be submitted for review?

(0) Thank | Lee55

How did it go after the dip, did you receive it?

(0) Thank | Lee55

You are really nice.

(0) Thank | LzLzzzzz