It took two months for the review, and it was not too difficult. The comments given by the reviewers were nice. One week after minor revision, it was accepted. Generally speaking, if the experiments are enough, there will be no big problems.

(1) Thank | 卢子凰

This journal only publishes a small number of papers each year. Has a high standard for pharmacology. The quality is fairly good. The first round of review takes about 2 months.

(4) Thank | 道法自然

Extremely slow, asked multiple times in the middle, but they claimed to be unable to find any reviewers. As a result, we found 5-6 reviewers in the end, but only one of them provided substantial feedback. Two were very good, while the other two simply suggested minor revisions. Ultimately, the editor rejected the submission outright. Be cautious when considering submitting to them!

(0) Thank | Nemo711

Review Speed: 2.0
Experience Sharing: This journal has a low annual publication volume with a high requirement for pharmacology, but the quality is good. The first review process takes around 2 months

(0) Thank | 水荷酱吖

This magazine has a low annual publication volume, with high requirements for pharmacology and decent quality. The first review cycle is around 2 months

(0) Thank | 墟散高芬

Review speed: 12.0 | Submission acceptance rate: 50.0
Experience sharing: This journal is really slow. The first review took two months, and there has been no change in three months for the second review. It's too time-consuming

(0) Thank | 北陆梧桐

We are only 2 points behind, hopefully we can catch up next year

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁