Mar. 08 submitted; Apr. 16 major revision; May. 16 submitted; May 23 minor revision; May. 27 submitted; May. 27 accept. The editor-in-chief Prof. LG Hultman processed the manuscript very quickly. Comments were given in about one month. The reviewer gave a lot of professional comments, he reviewed the manuscript very meticulously, and compared my work with his article published in the top journal MMTB, requiring it to be comprehensive. But the problem is not difficult to solve. At the same time, the editor also asked three questions. It should have been accepted at the first review. But the editor insisted on a response to the question that he raised, and we then had to honestly added more than two thousand words of reply to satisfy him!

(2) Thank | songguo

May 05, 2020, Submitted; May 05, 2020, With editor; May 10, Major Revision; May 11, Submitted; May 11, Under Review; May 12, Under Review; May 14, Under Review; May 24, Revise; May 26, Submitted; May 27, Accept. This is a short communication on the mechanical properties of magnesium alloys. Thanks to Professor Paul Mayrhofer for his high efficiency!

(7) Thank | cchong

It was submitted on January 19, 2020, but was rejected the next day. Resubmission was requested after adding simulation verification. 2020.01.20 resubmission, on the same day with editor, under review; 2020.02.22 major revision; 2020.03.09 submission after major revision; 2020.04.08 major revision; 2020.04.09 submitted after revision; 2020.04.10 accept. The processing speed of the editor was really fast. It is within two days from “Submitted to journal” to “with editor”.

(3) Thank | sdprince

I submitted on May 26, 2015, and received the review comments one month later, on June 28. One reviewer, gave a total of 14 comments. I submitted the revised version on July 26 (Saturday) at 11:00 am, and received the email accepting the paper at 9:00 that evening. This is my experience, my first paper! The whole process took two months, so fast! The Editor-in-Chief, Prof. L.G. Hultman is very conscientious, very good! Every email from them was very kind, I really appreciated it. Good luck to everyone!

(6) Thank | HAHAHA

25.09.10 Revision Submitted to Journal

(0) Thank | xdpbeyond

Revision Submitted to Journal

(0) Thank | xdpbeyond

Classmate, may I ask what direction you are in? You shouldn't be this slow, according to reason.

(0) Thank | xdpbeyond

How long does it take for the review after the major revision? It has been almost a month since my major revision and the review is still ongoing.

(0) Thank | killerty

25.08.09 RRC four reviewers have all completed their reviews.

(0) Thank | xdpbeyond

A major overhaul in less than 40 days was completed, which shows very high efficiency.

(0) Thank | 邓邓爱伦

25.07.30 RRC

Please translate the following paragraph into English: 25.07.30 RRC

(0) Thank | xdpbeyond

25.7.21 under review.

(0) Thank | xdpbeyond

25th July 2019, WE

(0) Thank | xdpbeyond

Submitted to Journal on July 25, 2018.

(0) Thank | xdpbeyond

On the day of submission, the editor-in-chief returned feedback without sending it for review, directly giving a major revision. Five suggestions were made to revise and resubmit for review, along with a request to read XPS-related literature. It was also mentioned that the journal's literature references were not sufficient, so additional references were added as required, and experiments were supplemented accordingly. After making all the requested modifications over half a month, the revised manuscript was submitted. However, it was rejected the next day. Upon careful review of the rejection reasons, it was discovered that the editor had not paid much attention to the response letter and revised manuscript. The rejection was based on strange reasons, such as the excessive use of words like "successful". This was a very unreasonable submission experience, provided for reference to others. Sigh.

(0) Thank | 妮妮头

Brother, may I ask how things are going in the back? I've also been waiting for two months and still in UR.

(0) Thank | Yuwh123

Friend, any progress updates? I also had my submission rejected and resubmitted.

(0) Thank | 一拳一个嘤嘤怪

2024.7. Under Review
2025.5. Under Review
Reminded twice.

(0) Thank | 热气腾腾的面条

2025.4.10 Submitted to journal
2025.4.10 With Editor
2025.4.11 Under Review
2025.4.26 Required Reviews Completed
2025.5.4 Required Reviews Completed

The paper was rejected and resubmitted. The first reviewer felt that the experiment was not related to the vacuum environment and the editor was concerned about XPS issues, leading to the rejection. After conducting new experiments and informing the reviewer that the journal can accept non-vacuum-related articles, the paper was resubmitted. It has been a week now and the status is still "Required Reviews Completed." Are there any friends who have experienced a similar situation? What is the issue and what should I do?

(0) Thank | 三颗板牙

According to reason, it shouldn't take this long, but the editor may be busy. Let's wait a little longer.

(0) Thank | zhqdd

It has been five days since the returned products were handed over to the editor, what is going on?

(0) Thank | morgan

Cool cool, it's all good now.

(0) Thank | 大雪坪

I can't accept it anymore.

(0) Thank | oneshy

When I woke up, the sky had collapsed and turned into three districts.

(1) Thank | 拉面不要面

Don't worry, the articles published in 2025 should be based on the divisions released next year, right?

(0) Thank | SCI/SCIE