Mar. 08 submitted; Apr. 16 major revision; May. 16 submitted; May 23 minor revision; May. 27 submitted; May. 27 accept. The editor-in-chief Prof. LG Hultman processed the manuscript very quickly. Comments were given in about one month. The reviewer gave a lot of professional comments, he reviewed the manuscript very meticulously, and compared my work with his article published in the top journal MMTB, requiring it to be comprehensive. But the problem is not difficult to solve. At the same time, the editor also asked three questions. It should have been accepted at the first review. But the editor insisted on a response to the question that he raised, and we then had to honestly added more than two thousand words of reply to satisfy him!

(2) Thank | songguo

May 05, 2020, Submitted; May 05, 2020, With editor; May 10, Major Revision; May 11, Submitted; May 11, Under Review; May 12, Under Review; May 14, Under Review; May 24, Revise; May 26, Submitted; May 27, Accept. This is a short communication on the mechanical properties of magnesium alloys. Thanks to Professor Paul Mayrhofer for his high efficiency!

(7) Thank | cchong

It was submitted on January 19, 2020, but was rejected the next day. Resubmission was requested after adding simulation verification. 2020.01.20 resubmission, on the same day with editor, under review; 2020.02.22 major revision; 2020.03.09 submission after major revision; 2020.04.08 major revision; 2020.04.09 submitted after revision; 2020.04.10 accept. The processing speed of the editor was really fast. It is within two days from “Submitted to journal” to “with editor”.

(3) Thank | sdprince

I submitted on May 26, 2015, and received the review comments one month later, on June 28. One reviewer, gave a total of 14 comments. I submitted the revised version on July 26 (Saturday) at 11:00 am, and received the email accepting the paper at 9:00 that evening. This is my experience, my first paper! The whole process took two months, so fast! The Editor-in-Chief, Prof. L.G. Hultman is very conscientious, very good! Every email from them was very kind, I really appreciated it. Good luck to everyone!

(6) Thank | HAHAHA

According to reason, it shouldn't take this long, but the editor may be busy. Let's wait a little longer.

(0) Thank | zhqdd

It has been five days since the returned products were handed over to the editor, what is going on?

(0) Thank | morgan

Cool cool, it's all good now.

(0) Thank | 大雪坪

I can't accept it anymore.

(0) Thank | oneshy

When I woke up, the sky had collapsed and turned into three districts.

(1) Thank | 拉面不要面

Don't worry, the articles published in 2025 should be based on the divisions released next year, right?

(0) Thank | SCI/SCIE

Focus on one quickly. Thinking back to the old days, submitting at night and getting rejected in the morning. Shamelessly, they made me revise five articles over and over again, and I gave them all minor revisions.

(0) Thank | 混子6

What is wrong?

(0) Thank | 噗嗤一笑吧

It's too difficult.

(0) Thank | MBIP

Comrades, we are in the third quarter and my mindset is collapsing...

(1) Thank | 投麻了

How is the situation now? I invested around the same time as you did.

(0) Thank | morgan

I submitted the manuscript at the end of November last year, and it was sent for review the next day. It was reviewed by 16 reviewers, 4 of whom accepted the review. The comments came back for major revisions on December 28th. In addition to the reviewers' comments, the editor also mentioned the elements H and O, which were not relevant to my research. However, I happened to conduct oxygen element surface and line scans while conducting transmission experiments. I did not conduct experiments on the H element, so I directly wrote two paragraphs citing literature to explain the effects of these two elements on performance. The revised manuscript was sent back to the same 4 reviewers, three of whom submitted their comments on time and all accepted the manuscript. The fourth reviewer did not submit their comments and after reminding the editor once, they still did not reply. After more than 50 days without any response, I reminded the editor again, and the manuscript was accepted directly.

(1) Thank | 番西茄

Rejected within 24 hours ?

(0) Thank | 辰风

投稿等待。

(0) Thank | 辰风

Trashy magazine, five reviewers, over forty comments, delayed for six months, causing my master's degree to be postponed!

(0) Thank | 张坤坤

2025.3.11 Accept

(0) Thank | zhqdd

March 11, 2025. With Editor.

(0) Thank | zhqdd

RRC for half a month.

(0) Thank | 工藤新一的好兄弟

It only took a few days for the rework to turn into RRC, which means the review has ended and is now waiting for the editor's processing. I processed it on the same day. Just wait, if there is news from the editor in a day or two, it's good news. If it stays in RRC for a long time, it might be bad news. Also, I have added you as a friend.

(0) Thank | zhqdd

The rework turned into RRC in a few days, which means the review is over and waiting for the editor's processing. I processed it on the same day as the editor. Just wait, good news will come in a day or two if the editor has a message, if it stays in RRC for a long time, it may be bad news. Also, I added you as a friend.

(0) Thank | zhqdd

Bro, I have another question. I was rejected and now I have to go back to RRC from UR. What are the chances of being rejected again after the repair?

(0) Thank | 工藤新一的好兄弟