This varies depending on the individual. If the main results have been completed, it is generally recommended to start with the results. If the main results are still in progress, you can start with the methods and introduction

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

I suggest completing the main results section first, then you can start writing the article. Alternatively, you can start brainstorming the article once you have obtained the main phenotypic data or completed the design of the project, and then write as you go

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

What is the typical writing order for a research article?

(0) Thank | 平原文波

At what stage of the experiment is it appropriate to start writing the article?

(0) Thank | 龙鳞孝礼

Review speed: 2.0 | Submission hit rate: 25.0 Experience sharing: The first review took close to 2 months, and the second review after revision took about 1 and a half months. The reviewers had no comments, but the final editor said the language needed careful editing. Even after seeking help to revise, the editor was still not satisfied and ultimately rejected the submission. The editor was too harsh, and the submission was ultimately rejected due to language issues. It took half a year in total, which was very frustrating! The efficiency seems low, and the language requirements are extremely high!

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

The magazine is relatively easy, with a first review of 1.5 months

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

The editor-in-chief has the final say on this magazine, and the standards are quite strict. It will take half a year to have page numbers after being approved

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁