Given the diversity and complexity of biological systems, it’s perfectly acceptable for different results to emerge and be published, as scientific research itself allows and encourages questioning, supplementing, and improving previous knowledge, and even overturning it. When writing papers, we need to focus on two main strategies: accurately report materials and methods, and results, especially where they differ from others, should be emphasized and detailed; in the discussion section, one should not shy away from contradictions, compare similarities and differences with previous researchers, and attempt to provide reasonable and effective explanations

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

The relationship between the results of this study and relevant theories; the shortcomings or limitations of your research; the significance and practical application value of this research; suggestions for future research

(0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德

How to handle discrepancies between my discussion and a previously published article?

(0) Thank | 深渊兴业

What can be discussed in a discussion?

(0) Thank | 魂魄彦露

It's just so-so, as long as I can graduate, my senior brother published an article last year, which can also be considered a successful graduation, then everything will be fine

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Cites in 2012 to items published in: 2011 = 111 Number of items published in: 2011 = 66 2010 = 89 2010 = 59 Sum: 200 Sum: 125 Calculation: Cites to recent items 200 = 1.600 Number of recent items 125 5-Year Journal Impact Factor Cites in {2012} to items published in: 2011 = 111 Number of items published in: 2011 = 66 2010 = 89 2010 = 59 2009 = 53 2009 = 52 2008 = 24 2008 = 0 2007 = 28 2007 = 0 Sum: 305 Sum: 177 Calculation: Cites to recent items 305 = Number of recent items 177 Journal Self Cites The tables show the contribution of the journal's self cites to its impact factor. This information is also represented in the cited journal graph. Total Cites 682 Cites to Years Used in Impact Factor Calculation 200 Impact Factor 1.600 Self Cites 270 (39% of 682) Self Cites to Years Used in Impact Factor Calculation 146 (73% of 200) Impact Factor without Self Cites 0.432

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Please submit your manuscript carefully in 2014!

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

This magazine is very likely to be suppressed next year! Be careful when submitting articles

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Impact Factor without Self Cites 0.432

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Self Cites 73%  It is very likely to be suppressed in 2014 Be careful when submitting

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Self Cites 73% 2014 is very likely to be suppressed. Be careful when submitting

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Don't worry, the layout of the articles for this magazine in 2013 has not been completed yet, so it cannot be entered into the database. Everyone please rest assured and patiently wait, the editor-in-chief of this magazine is very responsible

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Does anyone know the 2013 SCI data retrieval results for this journal? My article has been with them for over two years, and the editor said it would be published soon. I'm feeling uncertain, if anyone knows, please let me know quickly. I'm going crazy

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

No articles from this journal were found for the year 2013

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

This magazine only publishes one article every two years... Truly the words of a master!

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

A magazine with high self-citation rates for two consecutive years must be a good magazine!

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

This magazine only publishes an article every two years, it is not easy to get published in this magazine, the editor-in-chief is very responsible

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

It's a journal with a high impact factor

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

It's a scientific journal

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

This is a SCI journal

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Who can download the 2013 search SCI data to have a look

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

可能被剔除

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Self-citation rate too high at 65%

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

The latest database of SCI shows that in 2013, it is possible that this journal is slow

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁

Does this magazine cost money?

(0) Thank | 凌霄高洁