| Journal Profile | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Journal Title | SURGICAL NEUROLOGY (According to the latest JCR data, this journal is not indexed in the JCR.) | ||||
| Journal Title Abbreviations | SURG NEUROL | ||||
| ISSN | 0090-3019 | ||||
| h-index | N.A. | ||||
| CiteScore | N.A. | ||||
| Self-Citation Ratio (2020-2021) | N/A | ||||
| 期刊简介 | Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Ut enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exercitation ullamco laboris nisi ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat. Duis aute irure dolor in reprehenderit in voluptate velit esse cillum dolore eu fugiat nulla pariatur. Excepteur sint occaecat cupidatat non proident, sunt in culpa qui officia deserunt mollit anim id est laborum. | ||||
| Official Website | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/00903019 | ||||
| Online Manuscript Submission | |||||
| Open Access | No | ||||
| Publisher | ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC, 360 PARK AVE SOUTH, NEW YORK, USA, NY, 10010-1710 | ||||
| Subject Area | Medicine | ||||
| Country/Area of Publication | UNITED STATES | ||||
| Publication Frequency | Monthly | ||||
| Year Publication Started | 1973 | ||||
| Annual Article Volume | 0 | ||||
| Gold OA文章占比 | |||||
| OA期刊相关信息 | |||||
| WOS期刊SCI分区 | |||||
| Indexing (SCI or SCIE) | |||||
| Link to PubMed Central (PMC) | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0090-3019%5BISSN%5D | ||||
| Average Duration of Peer Review * | Authorized Data from Publisher: Data from Authors: | ||||
| Competitiveness * | Data from Authors: Easy | ||||
| Useful Links |
| ||||
| *All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed. | |||||
|
|
| |
| First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |
| Reviews on SURGICAL NEUROLOGY: | Write a review |
| Author: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-12-30 15:06:15 Choose the issues to be discussed in depth; discuss the selected issues from multiple perspectives in a certain order, with reasoning based on, problems clearly explained and thoroughly understood  (0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德  |
| Author: 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-12-30 09:21:30 Highlight the innovation of your research, demonstrating distinctive features different from others. The degree of difference is another matter, but it is essential to have a distinction. As long as there is a distinction, it is considered innovative (0) Thank | 维尔娜菲茨杰拉德 |
| Author: 魂魄彦露 Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-12-28 19:49:52 What is a profound discussion? How to deepen the depth of discussion? (0) Thank | 魂魄彦露 |
| Author: 平原文波 Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2021-12-27 09:15:00 How to Highlight the Innovation of an Article in a Discussion? (0) Thank | 平原文波 |
| Author: 凌霄高洁 Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2011-07-25 14:22:29 Although there were 6 reviewers, it seems that receiving supportive replies from the first 3 was enough. It took about 4 months from submission to acceptance, with a delay of 2 months during the revision period. Overall, the speed was good. After all, in the field of neuroscience, this journal is not considered very prestigious, so it was relatively easy (0) Thank | 凌霄高洁 |
| Author: 凌霄高洁 Subject Area: Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s) Result: Pending & Unknown Write a review |
Reviewed 2010-06-25 08:25:10 Six reviewers (0) Thank | 凌霄高洁 |
| First Previous 1 Next Last (To Page | |