2020.07.01, submission; 07.14, the reviewers invited; 07.26, under review; 08.14, under review; 09.07, under review. It has been 3 months after submission, and the statuses are updated relatively timely, but I don’t know whether it can be accepted.

(0) Thank | Cola-Guan

It was submitted on July 1st. No editors were assigned for 10 days. It may be due to the impact of the COVID-19. Elsevier has become particularly slow recently. Then I sought support from Elsevier. They replied and let me wait until the third weekend. As a result, the editor rejected the manuscript the next day. Maybe innovative was not enough.

(0) Thank | Mamba4Life

What I study is about spintronics. After submitting the manuscript, the reviewer's comments were not very good, and the editor directly rejected it. I didn't argue, because I didn't think it was necessary. After all, there were so many journals, and later I transferred it to Springer's "Journal of Superconductivity and Novel Magnetism". The editing process was very fast, and the two reviewers invited were also very nice. From submission to official publication, it was revised once. A little more than two months. It would be nice if it was submitted here earlier.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Superlattice and Microstructure started in 1985, 12 issues throughout the year, published by Elsevier, SCI 2003 impact factor 0.604, 2003 EI included 40 articles. Published papers and reviews to discuss issues related to semiconductors and physics, chemistry, materials science, and electrical engineering with submicrostructures of metals, insulation, and superconducting properties. It involves the electronic and mechanical properties of synthetic structures, the migration and dynamic properties of conductive solids, the application of superlattices and microstructures, and submicrostructures.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Have you received it?

(0) Thank | Cola-Guan

Me too, what's the situation?

(0) Thank | bluepanda4

It has been 8 days since submission, and it is still "Submitted to Journal." What is going on?

(0) Thank | ligenzhuang

Jul 09, 2022 Submit - July 9, 2022 Submit
Aug 19, 2022 Major - August 19, 2022 Major
Sep 30, 2022 Accept - September 30, 2022 Accept

(0) Thank | Wie Coa

It took approximately two months to be accepted. After more than a month, I received the reviewer's comments, which required major revisions. The reviewer's comments were very detailed, and I added nearly a page of content. After submission, it took about a week and a half to be accepted. However, this journal has changed its name to "Micro and Nanostructures". The latest impact factor will only be available next year.

(1) Thank | Wie Coa

2022.01.12 Submitted to Journal
2022.01.12 With Editor
2022.01.13 Editor Invited
2022.01.14 With Editor
2022.01.14 Under Review
2022.01.24 Major Revise
2022.03.23 Uploaded Revised Manuscript directly With Editor
2022.03.24 With Editor
2022.03.29 Editor Invited
2022.03.30 With Editor
2022.03.30 Under Review
2022.04.04 Completed Reject

Note: The translation provided is a direct translation of the text and may not represent the intended meaning accurately.

(0) Thank | KEYAN

Where was the subsequent paper of the thread owner accepted? It's a bit frustrating to be rejected after four months of major revisions.

(0) Thank | KEYAN

Update the status,
Submitted on July 1, 2020
Major revision on September 27, 2020
Received reviewer comments with editor on November 22, 2020
Under review on November 25, 2020
Accepted on January 2, 2021
Took 6 months, thanks to my advisor and the reviewers, everything was timely.

(0) Thank | Cola-Guan

About a month after the investment, we were asked to make major repairs. After the repairs were completed, we waited for almost four months and were rejected. The final decision did not have the original first reviewer's opinion. The second reviewer agreed to accept it, but after being criticized by the new third reviewer and judged as having no value, it was rejected.

(0) Thank | 猫南北

Submitted on May 28th, received an email on May 30th requesting a transfer. Recommended several journals, all of which are good and have a fast response time, so it won't delay the submission.

(0) Thank | J天旭

Hello, how is your reviewing speed? Nobody has been sharing recently, so I would like to know if this journal is fast-paced.

(0) Thank | 一颗苹果树

One and a half monthsFor minor repairs, a reviewer, modify the return and receive it directly on the same day.In short, the efficiency is not bad.

(0) Thank | metalcry

The editing efficiency is very high, like

(0) Thank | 641937866@qq.com

The review was very quick, and I returned to the overhaul after one month. The comments from the reviewers helped the paper greatly. After the overhaulThe third day accept, very excited.

(1) Thank | 大鱼

The review was very quick, and I returned to the overhaul after 1 month. The comments from the reviewers helped the paper very much. It was very exciting on the third day after the overhaul.

(0) Thank | 大鱼

has a high degree of innovation and language requirements for 30 days. The revised comments are added to the reference. The reference was added when the revision was made, and the second day was directly acceptd!What is done is the first-principles two-dimensional material surface adsorption.

(0) Thank | 403084150@qq.com

February 13th, submitted, has been in the No editor invited state, what is the situation?!Don't write back to the editor!!

(1) Thank | Photonics

2Submission on the 18th, directly on the 20th, followed by some copyright, proofreading, very efficient.Like some new, better results.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

2 No. 18 submission, 20 directly acceptd, followed by some copyright, proof, very efficient.Like some new, better results.

(1) Thank | 2580959473@qq.com

I feel that this journal is very efficient in editing, like one.Submitted on November 8th, returned on the 20th, minor repair, selectd on the 27th, received directly on the 28th.Very efficient, like this journal.

(1) Thank | zyyecnu@163.com

were almost four months old, and the results were rejected. It was said that there was a lack of model derivation, but thank you to the reviewer.full.

(0) Thank | rs