It lasted for less than one month from submission to acceptance. The editor is researcher Li Hong. Thank you! This is about detailed research of structure and dynamics of battery material. Whether it is fast depends on the editors and reviewers, or your luck. Good luck to everyone.

(8) Thank | penguin

The speed of processing the manuscript is very fast, two reviewers. They recommended a minor revision and finally a major revision (3 months). The questions raised by the reviewers are quite professional, which is very helpful for improving the quality of the papers, but it was necessary to make up three experiments.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The overall difficulty is not high, and you have already been hired.

(0) Thank | 小五小五88

It has been 18 days since entering the RRC status, and it has been three months since submission, but we still haven't received the first review comments. Has anyone else experienced this situation?

(0) Thank | 李姐万岁

The target is small, and after the teacher's review, it was suggested to submit to SSI. After one initial review, one major revision, and one minor revision, the reviewer provided very constructive feedback which enriched the article. After the modifications, it was accepted. This is my first SSI article, and I am very satisfied! Thanks to Editor Hong Li and the reviewer. I wish SSI continued success!

(1) Thank | 科研卧龙隋主任

The article I submitted a couple of days ago was rejected during the under review process due to the reason of duplicate submission, as it was found that I had submitted it to another journal. However, that journal had already rejected my submission a month ago. What should I do in this situation?

(0) Thank | 梁建海

After receiving the reply, it took three days to finalize the layout and make detailed modifications. The publication will be available online seven days after submission. In the future, I will continue to help master's students submit to this journal and assist them in graduating successfully!

(0) Thank | wishroad

The speed is fast, and thanks to the work of Researcher Hong Li.
First review response within 2 weeks.
Around 15 comments were given, requiring major revisions with a deadline of 20 days.
However, during the revision period, the COVID-19 policies were relaxed, and everyone in the team fell ill.
An additional extension of 10 days for revision was applied and approved.
The submission happened to coincide with the Chinese New Year, with a reply and acceptance received on the first working day after the holiday.
Thank you for recognizing our work, and I wish the journal continuous improvement!

(0) Thank | wishroad

2022.06.09 Submitted
2022.06.11 With Editor
2022.06.16 Under Review
2022.06.30 Major Revision with two reviewers, more than 10 suggestions + additional experiments required
2022.07.10 Resubmitted
2022.07.11 Required Reviews Completed
2022.07.14 Accepted
Thanks to Editor-in-Chief Li Hong and the reviewers for their constructive comments. Best wishes for the continued success of Solid State Ionics.

(0) Thank | 嘉嘉sunshine

Posted on 2021-07-01
Received first-round review comments on 2021-10-07, after a three-month wait. Two reviewers had a total of seven minor revision comments, and additional experiments were required.
Returned with revisions on 2021-10-22.
Overall, the review comments were a bit slow, possibly because the direction I submitted (sibs) did not align well with the journal's main focus, making it difficult to find reviewers.
Accepted on 2022-01-03, after a total of six months.

(0) Thank | weizq1971749

Post on 2021-07-01
Received first-round review comments on 2021-10-07, after a three-month wait. There were two reviewers and a total of seven minor revisions were suggested, along with the need for additional experiments.
Returned with revised comments on 2021-10-22.
Overall, the review process was a bit slow, possibly due to the mismatch between the topic of my submission (SIBs) and the main focus of the journal, making it difficult to find suitable reviewers.

(1) Thank | weizq1971749

Posted on June 1st, with editor on June 2nd, under review on June 3rd, rejected on June 22nd. Overall, the editor was very prompt and responsible, and the reviewer's comments were constructive. For example, they asked how to determine whether a certain substance is A or B, why the fitting is linear, and what is the fundamental reason for improving electrochemical performance. There were also some language and grammar issues. I have been working on revisions for a month now and have submitted it to another journal. I hope it gets accepted!!! Fingers crossed!

(1) Thank | Tinahhh

Submitted to the reception within a total of one month, the editor is Li Wei researcher, thank youWhat is done is a detailed structural and kinetic study of the battery material.This journal is not fast enough to estimate the editors and reviewers, look at their luck, I wish you good luck

(2) Thank | penguin

functional polymer, I feel that this journal is very slag, but fortunately there is a physical area is the second district, it is estimated that it will fall later, basically the recommended reviewThe manuscript examined, the water release is too obvious, and the time is too long.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

solid electrolyte in this above, six months unknown result

(0) Thank | 芳芳

The first-instance of the journal was close to 6 months, received after the minor repair, and the researcher of the Asian Institute of Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Li Wei, a researcher, compares nice.

(0) Thank | rmc2005@yeah.net

Suggest one month, who said that the lithium battery article is receiving fast, this is two and a half months, still have no letter, anxious national awards, really want to open

(1) Thank | 763419055@qq.com

is too slow, 150 days, two reviewers, one to modify the comments, one to refuse, there is a quick release, this journal does notSuitable for

(0) Thank | 123

Just got an article.The select on August 25th was only reviewed in late October. Both were minor repairs. I accepted it the next day after uploading the revised manuscript.This is mainly to ask for new ideas~~

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This journal is a bit of a crash. It is not recommended to submit a manuscript when the paper is published. After one month, a minor repair is given. After the revision, one accepts a rejection.The result is rejected.After submiting another article, 4 months, there is no news yet.Little tangled, unwilling to continue to wait...

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I also selectd for 70 days, and also under review.心急

(0) Thank | Anonymous

The July 20th select has not yet been written, the previous submitment in the basic month to modify the opinion, anxious, worry about the cup

(0) Thank | Anonymous

has beenI feel that the article in the journal has a deeper theoretical depth. I have never dared to select before. I recently tried one of the waters and prayed for it!

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Personally feel that this journal is still ok, reviewers are still relatively responsible, and the questions raised are quite standard!It is worth recommending

(0) Thank | Anonymous

for 2 and a half months, no letter at all, personal feeling is very slow.

(0) Thank | Anonymous