The overall review speed is very slow, mainly related to the reviewer. 2017.5.22 submission. The status around 2017.8.1 is ‘Awaiting Reviewer Scores’. 1 ½ months later, 2017.9.22 status is ‘Awaiting AE Recommendation’, 3 weeks later, on 2017.10.17, received rejection letter. Throughout the process, there was no feedback about the manuscript from the journal. From submission to the first news (rejection), it took nearly 5 months. The technical editor apologized: "We apologize for the delay in getting the authors a response from the reviewers. The AE had some personal issues that delayed the manuscript."

(4) Thank | wangbisheng2@126.com

You're still evaluating, extending for a few years, and then after four years, you'll publish a catena.

(0) Thank | 不好不咕

It takes less than five months from submission to acceptance. It goes through three rounds of professional editing review and is sent for review only after passing all of them, which takes about one month. The first review takes three months, with two responsible peer reviewers and the associate editor providing many suggestions. Perhaps this editor is particularly interested in this research, as the feedback provided is very detailed. The second review takes less than a month, and ultimately, it is accepted.

(2) Thank | 橘子洲头

How long does it take to proofread? My first review took 6 months, the second review took 6 months, and finally it was accepted.

(0) Thank | Wang QF

The quality requirements for journals are quite good, but the review process was delayed during the pandemic. It was accepted after 8 months.

(0) Thank | jady

Excuse me, why did you only provide an account statement when paying the layout fee? How can I print the invoice?

(0) Thank | 小鑫涳

There is no meaning or identifiable text in the given input "#$%^&%". It appears to be a random combination of symbols and special characters.

(0) Thank | 不好不咕

Unfortunately, the text "$%&#$^*" does not have a specific meaning or translation in English. It appears to be a string of symbols and characters without any coherent message.

(3) Thank | 不好不咕

On the one hand, the journal currently does not have a formal and complete open access (OA) policy. Learning from the current trend of charging for services, offering money for open access would certainly increase the citation efficiency of the journal. On the other hand, as previously mentioned in response to the experience of peer review, we are not a self-service platform. It is a normal phenomenon in any country that the efficiency of peer review is low when there is no funding. Finally, in the current situation between China and the United States, domestic journals are gradually breaking free from constraints imposed by American journals. In the future, these journals will gradually decline in the constantly evolving domestic evaluation system. Based on the current situation of journal rankings and the emphasis on impact factor, it is difficult for this journal or this type of journal to bring greater practical benefits to authors. After all, survival in the current scientific research community takes precedence, and other aspects will gradually follow.

(10) Thank | 椭圆三向箔

Yeah, this journal directly reflects the current work status of Americans. Despite occupying many traditional academic advantages, their work efficiency is lower than that of our country's 996 culture. Their thinking is conservative and not as progressive as developing countries. Although a few big shots still lead the trend, they have no dominant position. Therefore, the impact factor of this journal is not high, with high demands and a significant decline in influence.

(2) Thank | 散人

Although it is in Zone 3, the difficulty is not easy, and the cost-effectiveness is extremely low!

(0) Thank | 椭圆三向箔

Submission is a unique system of SSSAJ, more complex and strictly double-blind compared to the Elsevier submission system. I chose SSSAJ for submitting a special issue for a conference, but the experience was very average. It took a week for the submission to enter the process, which included "ADM-ED-TE" for technical review, and then it reached the status of "AE: Not Assigned," indicating the preparation for assigning an editor, which lasted for 40 days without any editor being assigned. Unable to bear it, I contacted the journal's work email to inquire about the status. The staff was very efficient and replied the next day, urging the previous technical editor to assign an editor quickly. Even more efficiently, on the third day, the technical editor issued the judgment of rejection, stating that it did not meet the scope of the journal. In my mind, I could only say some expletives.
This was the worst submission experience, so I advise the experts to be cautious in submitting. The speed is truly slow.

(24) Thank | chief chen

It's really slow, still in the "Awaiting TE Assignment" status for half a month... If you are in a hurry for the result, don't submit to this journal.

(4) Thank | resercher

I have never seen such a strict review process, double blind, do not say, after three editors review, no chance to submit for trial after passing the test, after the acceptance, the school draft is more than one month,The editor also gave the re-touching language, and all accepted it. The last publishing editor also picked out a document error, not 2003, 2013, poor IF, 2019 will be around 1.9, and currently can’t see the rise.Trends, I guess people who know are all submitted, do not know, do not select, low IF, slow review, and a small $1000 page fee, why bother.How good is STOTEN, fast, IF, and save money.

(2) Thank | 散人

. After the New Year is over, the review is finished, and the USDA is stopped again.To the editor's update, yesterday received the letter, 3 reviewers, a lot of opinions, one positive and one negative, one, one said, I suggest that the authors re-sample the soils when treatments have been established longer. As itCurrently stands, and even with the revisions suggested below, I feel this paper is not up to the high standard expected by SSSAJ. The editor will never listen to the best, must consider the worst opinions, decisively reject the manuscript, re-submitment is no play.

(0) Thank | 散人

selectd 2, the results are completely different.The first article submitted in July, after three editors, so dragged on for more than half a month, the draft was followed up, the editor warned that we are all volunteer services, .., will only become involved if there is anUndue delay in the processing of your manuscript, ie, > 3 months. Then, the review is very fast, 2 minor repairs, accepted after the repair, it is not difficult.Fast and Top, why not select?In November, I selectd again. This time, the editing process is fast, the review is delayed, the Christmas SSSA annual meeting,

(0) Thank | 散人

4.19 Submission6.11 First-instance overhaul8.10 Return to the revised draft8.21 Second-instance overhaul9.18 Return to the revised draft9.20 Receive

(0) Thank | 我不想说我是鸡

Two and a half months, the review speed is not very fast, no imagination is good, the reviewer is still very professional, although the rejection of the draft, or a lot of comments

(1) Thank | 土壤微生物

When does the status of your article start to show as under review?I have been posting for a month, but the status still shows TE Immed. Decision and Awaiting Reviewer Assignment.

(5) Thank | 一个对审稿状态很无语的人

has been reviewed for 2 months, currently awaiting AE recommendation Prayer has good results

(0) Thank | 2302479233@qq.com

has been reviewed for 2 months, currentlyAwaiting AE recommendation Prayer has good results

(0) Thank | 2302479233@qq.com

has been reviewed for 2 months, currently awaiting AE recommendation Prayer has a good result

(0) Thank | 2302479233@qq.com

has been reviewed for 2 months, currently awaiting AE recommendation PrayerHave a good result

(0) Thank | 2302479233@qq.com

has been reviewed for 2 months, currently awaiting AE recommendation Prayer has good results

(0) Thank | 2302479233@qq.com

2017.08 submitted;The editor of 2017.09 commented on a month, tragedy, saying that there is no global value in the things that are done, only limited to the region, encouraging re-submitment;2017.10 gave up on October 1st vacation, and then selectd again. The second guide is very powerful and has a lot of specific method opinions;2017.10 under review2017.12At the end of 2017.12, it took 13 days to repair it.Accepted two weeks after 2017.01, no further trials were sent.A very powerful journal, the perennial low-impact factor is the TOP of the Chinese Academy of Sciences.Strength and quality are legendary.The journals are very strict and double-blind, and the reviewers do not see the author's information, avoiding acquaintances' irregular operations.The editor is very responsible and the reviewer is constructive and serious.A lot of comments were made on the actual improvement level, and the revised draft was adopted.Looking down on the decaying continental soil journals, the influencing factors.....

(1) Thank | 835906635@qq.com