The review speed was a bit slow. It took three months for the first review, and one month for revision, and three months for the second review. It may be because the reviewers are not easy to find. It took seven months in total from submission to publication. It is said that the editorial department has changed people recently, and the review efficiency has been improved. It is a traditional optical journal, and a time-honored one, however, its impact factor is not high.

(0) Thank | 逐梦远航

The manuscript was submitted on September 3, 2019; on January 9, 2020 the first review comments were returned, major revision. 3 reviewers, the first reviewer's opinion was very pertinent and helpful to the article, it feels like a teacher in a domestic university; the second was a Moroccan scholar (because he asked to cite references), with sharp words, he negated and rejected the manuscript from language to experiment completely; the third reviewer gave a few positive comments with a few words and recommended direct acceptance. The revised manuscript was uploaded on February 7, 2020 and accepted on April 24, 2020. It lasted for nearly 8 months. The second review may be affected by the COVID19 and it took a long time.

(2) Thank | mh

This journal has published some high-profile literature in the past. For example, 2014 Nobel Chemistry Prize winner SW Hell and his collaborator M. Kroug published their paper "Ground State Depletion fluorescence microscopy: a concept for breaking the diffraction resolution limit" in this journal in 1995.

(0) Thank | sciencewatch

Haven't you followed up on the submission before? I have been following up in the early stages, but now there has been no progress. It seems that it is just the editorial department responding to emails.

(0) Thank | 12312

Hello, I am in the same situation as you, can we chat?

(0) Thank | 12312

Submitted on August 24th, under review since October 24th, still pending review, waiting.

(0) Thank | 你uncle的

Is there a template for the paper?

(0) Thank | hhx

Very quick, submitted in October, received major revisions in December, returned within 14 days, minor revisions returned within a week, accepted a week later, very fast process, reviewers were very proactive and gave great feedback, just accepted today, very happy

(0) Thank | Mechanic

Is there a charge for this journal, OP?

(0) Thank | Daisyw0221

The processing speed is quite fast, with feedback returned in five weeks after submission. Both reviewers recommended acceptance and provided helpful comments to enhance the quality of the article. The revised version was accepted within a week. A well-established journal, it is still very good

(10) Thank | henhao

Posted on September 18, 2021, waiting for the results.

(0) Thank | Jacky Xing

20.10.5投 - 20.10.5投 (投 - tóu) means "submitted on October 5th, 2020."
20.11.2编辑拒 - 20.11.2编辑拒 (编辑 - biānjí, 拒 - jù) means "rejected on November 2nd, 2020 by the editor."
理由是创新性不够 - 理由是创新性不够 (理由 - lǐyóu, 是 - shì, 创新性 - chuàngxīnxìng, 不够 - bùgòu) means "reason is lack of innovation."

(0) Thank | Fang Zhou

6 months to return to the first-instance opinion, then modify it, return to the second-instance opinion after one month, and notify the accept three days later.Retrieving

(1) Thank | 1111

The review speed is OK, I hope the journals are getting better and better.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

is very good, that is, the impact factor is a bit low, refueling

(0) Thank | Anonymous

seems to have only one reviewer, I don’t know what’s going on, I only received one opinion, but I’m serious, even the superscripts in the reference.The content of the article supplements some of the arguments. Without experimentation, it seems that the integrity of the article is still very important. Some things you think are common sense should also be written.

(0) Thank | 查无此人

Journal Homepage URL: http://http://www.springerlink.com/content/0946-2171/

(0) Thank | Anonymous

http://emuch.net/bbs/journal.php?view=detail&jid=5368&page=1

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This journal is officially published to be published 8-10 months online, quite slow

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Email submission, just one of the articles, the journal is good, need innovation

(0) Thank | Anonymous

can also be counted as a general journal, who said that the employment rate is 100%, about 45%Let's go.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

My article is delivered by mail.It took two months from submission to receipt, and it was shared for three months at the end of the online publication.This journal has an impact factor of around 2.1, which is good, and the journals are slightly biased.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I submitted it by email.There is no news for half a year.Even mails are not returned.Changed the mailbox or not.Such a journal is speechless.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

A very good journal, published an article, the speed is average (modified once, accepted for 50 days), I feel that the editor is more rigorous,The systematic and novelty of the article is very important

(0) Thank | Anonymous