In mathematics, the status of this journal was higher than that of Journal of Computational Physics, and it is also more difficult to be accepted.

(124) Thank | hydraul

The review is very strict and the response speed is very fast. It is not necessary to recommend reviewers.

(1) Thank | Anonymous

Hello teacher! May I ask how CiCP (Commun.Comput.Phys) is doing in China?

(0) Thank | Havoc

Could you please tell me if there will be additional reviewers for the second revision of the rework? Thank you!

(0) Thank | hzl0045

Hello friends, do submissions to this journal need to be checked for plagiarism now? If so, what is the maximum acceptable similarity level? Thank you~

(0) Thank | 正版余则成

Can work together as a team

(2) Thank | winterfell

May I ask if this magazine has corresponding authors and if it is possible to have co-first authors?

(0) Thank | chimezie

Excuse me, does this magazine have corresponding authors? Can multiple authors be listed as first authors?

(0) Thank | chimezie

Overall, the experience was quite pleasant. I submitted two articles, one of which was rejected after the first review and I submitted it to another journal. The other article was accepted after minor revisions, and the review process was smooth. The first review took about 2-3 months to receive a decision, and the accepted article took approximately 5 months from the initial submission to acceptance.

(2) Thank | winterfell

This journal is almost the best in the field of computational mathematics (of course, there are also the three major journals in computational mathematics, SIAM Numer. Anal., Math. Comput., Numer. Math., which focus more on analysis). There are not many journals better than it, such as SIAM REVIEW and ACTA NUMERICA. If you are working on computational fluid dynamics, computational physics, and related areas, CMAME and JCP are also very good top journals.

In terms of difficulty of publication: SIAM REVIEW and ACTA NUMERICA > SIAM Numer. Anal., Math. Comput., Numer. Math. SISC > CMAME, JCP. To my knowledge, these are the best top journals in the computational field. If there are any other recommendations, they can be added.

Unfortunately, after submitting the manuscript, it took 6 months for a minor revision and a rejection. The editor-in-chief rejected the manuscript because the numerical examples were not done well. After making revisions, it was submitted to CMAME and accepted. I hope to have the opportunity to submit to SISC again in the future.

(30) Thank | 木一小P孩

One of the top-tier journals in the field of computational mathematics; the best journal in the field of scientific computing; high demand for innovation in numerical methods and analysis. If not directly rejected by the editor, the first review process takes approximately 4-6 months, and the second review process takes approximately 2-4 months.

(267) Thank | math315

The standard of this magazine is still a bit low. Basically, scholars from the domestic computational mathematics community have their papers published in this magazine, and the difficulty level is far lower than that of the traditional three major computational mathematics magazines.

(31) Thank | IGA

Directly rejected in 3 days

(0) Thank | zhaoxiao2002@gmail.com

is directly rejected, not very relevant.

(3) Thank | Anonymous