This journal has recently provoked much discussion (the editor-in-chief's remarks related to Taiwan), it is recommended to check the official account of the Earth Science House, and it cannot be transmitted here (USA, you know).

(7) Thank | oceanography

The journal is quite efficient. The review comments were given in two months, minor revision is required. It was accepted in a few days. The quality of this journal is acceptable. Students who are anxious to graduate are recommended to vote for this journal.

(192) Thank | 油教授

The review was very quick, took 2 months overall.  Submitted in early April, reviewers suggested minor revisions at the end of April. After the revisions were submitted on May 1, received a revised opinion at the end of May, requesting overhaul. The revision was sent and received on June 19. High efficiency, much higher efficiency than these domestic publications. It is recommended to have good themes and try to submit abroad.

(112) Thank | 黯然销魂

JIF ranking surpasses Sedimentology, why the impact factor has decreased

(0) Thank | Jump

Laugh it off, how many years has AAPG endured?

(1) Thank | 武痴马保国

I'm speechless, Joe was moved to zone 1, and the ace SG was demoted to zone 3. Which article by SG is not better than Joe's?

(0) Thank | 武痴马保国

CNM, Chinese Academy of Sciences regional division

(0) Thank | 北油沉积小陈

Submitted by the end of May, accepted in mid-August, only one round of external review, major revisions-minor revisions-acceptance, one of the few outstanding journals in sedimentary studies, hoping for a higher impact factor in the future.

(0) Thank | 北油沉积小陈

6.10 Submission
6.11 Invite reviewers
6.15 Under Review
6.17 Invite reviewers
6.18 First reviewer completes review
6.23 Invite reviewers
6.24 Second reviewer accepts review
7.20 Revise and resubmit
7.21 can be accepted with major revision
8.15 Revise
8.17 Acceptance
The speed of the second submission is similar to the first one.

(0) Thank | 津贴津贴

3.5 Submitted to the editor;
3.7 Editor returned with many problems, requesting revisions and resubmission, very meticulous and responsible, except for the Taiwan issue in recent years, there were no other negative comments, very responsible editor.
3.11 Resubmitted;
3.16 Reviewer 1 accepted and completed, Reviewer 2 invited → 3
4.1 Reviewer completed, editor requested minor revisions by 4.15. Due to personal arrangements, delayed until 4.22
4.22 Submitted;
4.24 Accepted
4.28 Online
If not for the one-week delay, it could have been accepted in just six weeks.
Summary: Fast speed, low impact factor

(0) Thank | Dai

Please translate the following paragraph into English and Japanese, and title them as "English Translation:" and "Japanese Translation:"

(0) Thank | Dai

Submission in September, acceptance in December. Only one round of review, feedback is acceptable. The editorial board has great decision-making power. A prestigious journal in sedimentology, with just over 100 papers published each year. The majority of the articles are of high quality, although the impact factor is not particularly high

(2) Thank | GEO-WEN

Submitted on November 22nd, rejected on November 23rd due to formatting issues and need for explanation of experimental data, to be resubmitted;
Resubmitted on November 28th, editor assigned on December 5th;
Decision in process on December 6th, anticipated rejection again

(0) Thank | 大鹏

2022.09.07 Submitted
2022.09.12 Under review
2022.09.21 Under review
2022.10.21 Major revision
2022.11.18 Resubmitted
2022.11.22 Decision in process
2022.11.23 Accepted
The process is fast, if it weren't for my slow revisions, it could have been submitted half a month early.

(7) Thank | 津贴津贴

Overall, the speed of the journal is quite fast. My article was reviewed by three reviewers, two of whom requested revisions and one rejected it. The editor then sought another reviewer, and in the end, the article was accepted after modifications. The whole process took me five months, which should have been shorter if the quality of the article was higher. Additionally, the choice of editor is crucial. If the editor likes your article and a reviewer rejects it, the editor will find another reviewer. However, if the editor does not like it, it is likely to be rejected directly.

(11) Thank | 武痴马保国

The speed of manuscript review reception is too fast.

(0) Thank | Jump

May I ask in which specific area you work, and how you were rejected?

(0) Thank | onlyqqlll

How many days does it take to submit for review?

(0) Thank | onlyqqlll

Submit in May, revise in July, and receive by the end of the month. The speed of review is fast, the comments are constructive, and the editing efficiency is very high.
When the first reviewer accepts the review, "Reviewer(s) invited" changes to "Under Review".
After the last reviewer submits their comments, "Under Review" changes to "Required Reviews Completed".

(1) Thank | 刘西瓜

One major revision, due to a delay of two months caused by graduation. I am grateful for the understanding of the journal editor, allowing me to submit the revised version two months later. The chief editor accepted it within three days! SG should be considered a good earth science journal, and I am honored to have one of my papers accepted as a domestic doctoral student.

(101) Thank | 墨涵

After modification, editing and main editing are processed very quickly!

(26) Thank | 风雨彩虹

Hello, could you please send me a template? Thank you.

(0) Thank | 你管这叫云淡风轻

Hello, could you please send me a template? Thank you.

(0) Thank | 你管这叫云淡风轻

Rejected for three days, the direction does not align. But the thesis of the senior sister who did it before was accepted, wuwuwu.

(1) Thank | 小薇几

Just submitted for review, now looking for reviewers under "view". Wish me good luck!

(9) Thank | 风雨彩虹