The paper was more than ten pages, and it was submitted as a research paper. After two rounds, both the reviewer and AE agreed to the acceptance, and the editor in chief directly required us to revise it to a 2-page letter. We revised it as required and it was accepted for almost a month without notifying the proofreading, and I don’t know when it will be online. It is too difficult to get accepted by the domestic journals.

(2) Thank | qwerqwer

The first time it was a major revision required. It was ok after the revision, but there were minor revisions later. But they were all minor issues, about format and grammar, and what the sentences expressed.

(3) Thank | Kevin23

This is deceiving, be careful! If it were not for the school to use the CCF for rating, would anyone submit to this junk B journal? It is far less standardized than a C journal. Referees can be recommended when submitting a manuscript. I have recommended about 7–8 well-known domestic peers. I know exactly that the manuscript was assigned to 3 reviewers, and one of my peers informed that he received our manuscript and would review it carefully. One month later, it was rejected and only 2 review comments were received. The comments of the peers who informed us of receiving the manuscript did not appear in the review results. Was it removed? Where was the reviewer's comments? We could infer from their recommended literatures that the first reviewer was indeed recommended by us, and the comments were pertinent. The second reviewer must be our opponent. I can't think of other reasons. The beginning was "the current manuscript is with unacceptable quality, literatully and technically." Where is the politeness of speaking like this? There are no substantive comments in the comments. From the questions he raised, you can see that he lacks theoretical knowledge. I suggest that he supplement the basic theory. Finally, he said "English usuage is poor". There is an obvious grammatical error in your comment "be reduced to with......". Who taught you the expression of "to with"? Who gives you the confidence to say that others are not good at English? Editors and reviewers in this journal are unprofessional, and you may encounter opponents here. This kind of junk journal should not waste your time complaining. Just quickly change to another one.

(46) Thank | 否极泰来

50% acceptance rate.  Because the journal is a good one, it doesn't matterI The review process is slow and the review comments are really not very helpful. I had 11 months in the first review and 5 months in the second review. I was suddenly told that there was a problem with the format of the upload. There were four new reviewers in the second review, and I wanted to add the latest research content to increase my chances.

(5) Thank | Anonymous

Keep a record of the submission process:
Submitted on 2025.05.06

(0) Thank | Spring

It's very likely that you submitted it incorrectly.

(0) Thank | 这货遥遥领先

Excuse me, are there any requirements for the plagiarism rate in SCIS submissions? If so, what is the typical maximum allowed rate of duplication? And is SCIS a blind review process?

(0) Thank | W888

Can the version you submitted after modification be downloaded in the system? Why can I only download the version submitted in the first submission now?

(0) Thank | 牛

Hey guys, I want to ask what is the page requirement for this journal? I saw in a PDF that research papers should not exceed fifteen pages (not sure if this includes references), but I have seen some papers published in this journal that are over twenty pages long.

(0) Thank | 我不是AI

Does this journal only have EC and UR?
No EIC and AE?

(0) Thank | 小宝i

Does this journal require a waiting period of at least six months after acceptance before publication and indexing?

(0) Thank | misterjia

May I ask if you have received the first-instance verdict now?

(0) Thank | k_dido

No case distinction; not blind review.

(0) Thank | 这货遥遥领先

Also, when submitting the final draft, the '%' in the tex file should be mainly deleted, and the '%' that the user wrote should also be removed. Should the comments in the original template also be deleted according to the formatting requirements?

(0) Thank | Mr.Huo

May I ask, after your minor revision, when submitting the final draft, if there is a scis_supplementary.tex file, should the compiled scis_supplementary.pdf be uploaded together with the main text PDF, or should it be packaged in a rar archive?

(0) Thank | Mr.Huo

May I ask if there are any results yet, OP?

(0) Thank | wayyne

The submission made on November 7th is currently showing as "Under Review", so it is likely that it has not been externally reviewed yet, according to the usual speed.

(0) Thank | aniu12

May I ask if your external audit has been completed?

(0) Thank | aniu12

Is there any change in status during external audit?

(0) Thank | aniu12

The resubmission in September, there is still no news on anything, when did everyone's review comments go out?

(0) Thank | GarfieldCHN

Excuse me, after I submitted to this journal, it has been showing as "Under Review." Does this mean it is in the reviewing process, or does it need to change to "Under Review" and "Required Reviewer" for it to be under review?

(0) Thank | zhliu

Brother, have you received the results of your first round of review?

(0) Thank | zhliu

Excuse me, does this journal require blind review?

(0) Thank | sssyyy666

Is this journal peer-reviewed?

(0) Thank | sssyyy666

Submission was made on August 12, 2024. Currently, the manuscript number has exceeded 900, approaching 1000.

(0) Thank | Leo Way